Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Federal Reserve Chair is arguably the most powerful economic position in the world, and understanding how different chairs have shaped monetary policy is essential for grasping how the American economy has grown, contracted, and transformed over the past century. You're being tested on more than just names and datesโexam questions focus on monetary policy tools, inflation management, crisis response, and the tension between economic growth and price stability. Each chair represents a different approach to these fundamental challenges.
Don't just memorize who served when. Know what economic problem each chair faced, what tools they used to address it, and whether their approach represented tight money (fighting inflation) or easy money (stimulating growth). The best FRQ responses connect specific chairs to broader concepts like the Phillips Curve trade-off, quantitative easing, and central bank independence. Master those connections, and you'll handle any monetary policy question with confidence.
Some Fed chairs are remembered primarily for their willingness to raise interest rates aggressively, accepting short-term economic pain to achieve long-term price stability. This approach reflects the monetarist view that controlling the money supply is the Fed's primary responsibility.
Compare: Volcker vs. Martinโboth prioritized Fed independence and inflation control, but Volcker inherited a crisis requiring shock therapy while Martin worked to prevent inflation from taking hold. If an FRQ asks about central bank credibility, Volcker is your strongest example.
Other chairs are defined by their response to financial emergencies, deploying unconventional tools when traditional interest rate policy proves insufficient. These situations test the Fed's role as lender of last resort and its ability to prevent systemic collapse.
Compare: Bernanke vs. Greenspanโboth served during major financial disruptions, but Greenspan's approach was criticized for creating conditions for crisis while Bernanke's unconventional tools were designed to resolve one. This distinction is crucial for questions about moral hazard and Fed accountability.
Recent chairs have broadened the Fed's attention beyond inflation to include employment, inequality, and the distributional effects of monetary policy. This reflects the Fed's dual mandate and evolving understanding of what constitutes a healthy economy.
Compare: Yellen vs. Volckerโrepresents the evolution of Fed priorities over 35 years. Volcker focused almost exclusively on inflation; Yellen balanced price stability with employment and distributional concerns. This contrast illustrates debates about the appropriate scope of central bank responsibility.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Fighting inflation with tight money | Volcker, Martin |
| Crisis response and emergency lending | Bernanke, Greenspan |
| Quantitative easing and unconventional policy | Bernanke |
| Central bank independence | Martin, Volcker |
| Dual mandate (inflation + employment) | Yellen, Bernanke |
| Deregulation and market confidence | Greenspan |
| Transparency and Fed communication | Bernanke, Yellen |
Which two Fed chairs are most associated with establishing and defending central bank independence, and what specific challenges did each face?
Compare and contrast Volcker's approach to inflation with Greenspan's approach to financial crises. What does each reveal about the Fed's tools and priorities?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how the Fed responded when interest rates reached zero, which chair and which policy tool should anchor your response?
How did Janet Yellen's emphasis on labor markets represent a shift from earlier Fed priorities? What economic concept justifies this broader focus?
Why might economists criticize Greenspan's legacy while praising his crisis management during the 1990s? What tension does this reveal about monetary policy?