Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Marine conservation isn't just about saving cute sea turtles—it's about understanding how human activities interact with ocean ecosystems and what strategies actually work to restore ecological balance. You're being tested on your ability to connect conservation approaches to underlying biological principles: population dynamics, ecosystem services, trophic cascades, and biogeochemical cycles. The AP exam loves asking why certain interventions succeed while others fail, and how different threats require fundamentally different solutions.
Think of conservation efforts as falling into distinct categories based on what problem they're solving. Some protect space (habitat conservation), others regulate behavior (resource management), and still others address chemical or biological disruptions (pollution and invasive species control). Don't just memorize a list of programs—know what ecological principle each effort targets and why that approach makes sense for that particular threat.
These efforts focus on preserving or rebuilding the physical spaces marine organisms need to survive. The underlying principle is simple: without suitable habitat, populations cannot sustain themselves regardless of other protections.
Compare: MPAs vs. Coral Reef Restoration—both protect reef ecosystems, but MPAs focus on reducing human pressure while restoration actively rebuilds damaged structure. If an FRQ asks about addressing reef decline, consider whether the threat is ongoing (MPA approach) or damage already done (restoration approach).
Rather than excluding humans entirely, these strategies regulate how we interact with marine resources. The goal is maintaining populations above minimum viable thresholds while allowing continued harvest.
Compare: Sustainable Fishing vs. Marine Mammal Protection—both regulate human take, but fishing management allows continued harvest at sustainable levels while mammal protection typically prohibits all take. This reflects different population dynamics: fish have high fecundity and rapid recovery potential; marine mammals have low reproductive rates and slow recovery.
These efforts address how human-generated substances alter ocean chemistry and harm marine life. The key principle is that marine systems are sinks for terrestrial pollution, concentrating contaminants through bioaccumulation and biomagnification.
Compare: Plastic Pollution vs. Ocean Acidification—both involve human-generated pollutants, but plastic is a physical contaminant that can theoretically be removed, while acidification is a chemical change requiring global emissions reduction. This distinction matters for discussing solution feasibility on exams.
These strategies address living threats to native marine ecosystems—species that disrupt established community structures and competitive relationships.
Compare: Invasive Species Management vs. Habitat Restoration—both aim to restore ecosystem function, but invasive management removes harmful additions while restoration replaces missing components. An FRQ might ask you to design a comprehensive restoration plan requiring both approaches.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Spatial/Habitat Protection | MPAs, Mangrove Preservation, Coastal Restoration |
| Species-Specific Conservation | Sea Turtle Conservation, Marine Mammal Protection |
| Sustainable Resource Use | Sustainable Fishing Practices, Catch Quotas |
| Carbon Cycle Intervention | Mangrove Preservation, Combating Ocean Acidification |
| Pollution Mitigation | Plastic Reduction, Ocean Acidification Response |
| Ecosystem Restoration | Coral Reef Restoration, Coastal Habitat Restoration |
| Biological Threat Control | Invasive Species Management |
| Nursery Habitat Protection | Mangroves, Seagrass, Estuaries |
Which two conservation efforts both function as blue carbon strategies, and what distinguishes their primary conservation goals beyond carbon sequestration?
Compare the population recovery potential of a commercially overfished species versus a depleted marine mammal population—how does this difference influence management approach?
If an FRQ describes a coastal ecosystem with degraded water quality, reduced fish recruitment, and increased erosion, which conservation effort addresses all three problems simultaneously? Explain the mechanism.
Why might an MPA fail to protect coral reefs from decline even if fishing pressure is eliminated? Identify two threats that spatial protection alone cannot address.
Contrast the conservation challenges of addressing plastic pollution versus ocean acidification in terms of scale of intervention required and reversibility of damage.