Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you study strategic philanthropy, you're not just learning which foundation funds what—you're being tested on how foundations deploy capital to create systemic change. The exam will ask you to identify different philanthropic strategies, from direct service funding to policy advocacy to impact investing. Understanding why a foundation chooses one approach over another reveals the deeper logic of how private wealth intersects with public good.
These ten foundations represent distinct theories of change—some believe transformation comes through scientific innovation, others through grassroots organizing, and still others through cultural preservation. Don't just memorize their focus areas; know what strategic model each foundation exemplifies. When an FRQ asks you to recommend a philanthropic approach for a given problem, you'll need to match the strategy to the challenge.
These foundations believe lasting impact requires changing the rules of the game—not just funding programs, but reshaping policies, institutions, and power structures that perpetuate inequality.
Compare: Ford Foundation vs. Open Society Foundations—both prioritize social justice and systemic change, but Ford emphasizes grassroots organizing while Open Society focuses more heavily on governance reform and civil liberties. If an FRQ asks about domestic equity work, Ford is your stronger example; for global democracy initiatives, cite Open Society.
These foundations apply a venture philanthropy mindset to global challenges, using data, research, and measurable outcomes to guide massive investments in health infrastructure and innovation.
Compare: Gates Foundation vs. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—both focus on health, but Gates operates globally with an intervention model (vaccines, disease eradication) while RWJF works domestically on the conditions that create health. This distinction between treating disease vs. addressing determinants is highly testable.
These foundations prioritize place-based and population-specific strategies, believing transformation happens through strengthening families, communities, and local institutions.
Compare: W.K. Kellogg Foundation vs. Lilly Endowment—both emphasize community development, but Kellogg works nationally with an explicit racial equity lens while Lilly concentrates geographically and incorporates faith-based approaches. This illustrates how values shape strategy even among foundations with similar goals.
These foundations operate on the theory that cultural institutions and human creativity are essential infrastructure for a functioning society—not luxuries, but necessities.
Compare: Mellon Foundation vs. Hewlett Foundation—both fund arts and education, but Mellon concentrates deeply on cultural preservation and humanities while Hewlett spreads across multiple issue areas including environment. Mellon exemplifies depth, Hewlett exemplifies breadth in portfolio strategy.
| Strategic Approach | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Systems change / Policy advocacy | Ford Foundation, Open Society Foundations, MacArthur Foundation |
| Global health intervention | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation |
| Domestic health equity | Robert Wood Johnson Foundation |
| Place-based / Community focus | W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Lilly Endowment |
| Racial equity emphasis | W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Ford Foundation |
| Arts and cultural preservation | Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Hewlett Foundation |
| Impact investing pioneer | Rockefeller Foundation |
| Individual talent investment | MacArthur Foundation (genius grants) |
Which two foundations both prioritize health but differ in whether they work globally or domestically—and what strategic distinction does this represent?
If you needed to recommend a foundation model for a community seeking to address racial inequity through local organizing, which foundation's approach would you cite and why?
Compare and contrast the Ford Foundation and MacArthur Foundation: both fund social justice work, but how do their theories of change differ in terms of who drives innovation?
The Rockefeller Foundation pioneered "impact investing." How does this strategy differ from traditional grantmaking, and which other foundation on this list uses a similar data-driven, returns-oriented approach?
An FRQ asks you to design a philanthropic strategy for preserving cultural institutions while increasing their diversity. Which foundation's model provides the best template, and what specific elements would you incorporate?