Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
OSHA regulations form the backbone of workplace safety law in the United States, and you're being tested on more than just knowing what each rule requires. The exam expects you to understand how these regulations work together to create a comprehensive safety framework—from the broad catch-all authority of the General Duty Clause to highly specific standards targeting particular hazards like confined spaces or bloodborne pathogens. You'll need to recognize which regulation applies to different workplace scenarios and why Congress structured occupational safety this way.
These standards demonstrate key Employment Law principles: employer duty of care, regulatory compliance mechanisms, worker protection hierarchies, and the balance between business operations and employee safety. When you study these regulations, focus on the underlying logic—some require hazard elimination, others mandate protective equipment, and still others emphasize training and documentation. Don't just memorize the regulation names; know what type of protection each provides and when an employer would be liable for violations.
These regulations establish the baseline duties that apply across all industries. They create the legal foundation that specific standards build upon and fill gaps where no specific regulation exists.
Compare: General Duty Clause vs. Specific Standards—both create employer liability, but the General Duty Clause requires proving the hazard was "recognized," while specific standards create strict liability regardless of employer knowledge. If an FRQ presents an unusual workplace hazard, consider whether a specific standard applies first.
These regulations address invisible threats—substances that can harm workers through inhalation, skin contact, or bloodborne transmission. The common thread is the "right to know" principle: workers must understand what they're exposed to.
Compare: HazCom vs. Bloodborne Pathogens—both protect against substance exposure, but HazCom focuses on chemical hazards with SDS documentation, while Bloodborne Pathogens targets biological agents with exposure control plans. Know which applies to healthcare settings versus manufacturing.
These standards address dangers from the physical work environment—heights, noise, and dangerous energy sources. The regulatory approach here emphasizes hazard assessment first, then implementation of appropriate protective measures.
Compare: Fall Protection vs. Noise Exposure—both require hazard assessment and protective measures, but fall protection addresses acute injury risk while noise standards prevent cumulative harm over time. This distinction between immediate versus chronic hazards appears frequently on exams.
These regulations target specific high-risk work environments that require unique safety protocols beyond general workplace rules. The permit and program requirements reflect the elevated danger levels.
Compare: Confined Space vs. LOTO—both use permit/program systems to control access to dangerous situations, but confined spaces focus on environmental hazards (atmosphere, engulfment) while LOTO addresses energy hazards from equipment. Both require rescue planning and trained personnel.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Catch-all employer liability | General Duty Clause |
| Right-to-know protections | Hazard Communication Standard, Bloodborne Pathogens Standard |
| Airborne hazard controls | Respiratory Protection Standard, Occupational Noise Exposure Standard |
| Physical hazard prevention | Fall Protection Standards, Lockout/Tagout Standard |
| Permit/program-based systems | Confined Space Entry Standard, Lockout/Tagout Standard, Respiratory Protection Standard |
| Documentation requirements | Recordkeeping and Reporting, Hazard Communication (SDS), Exposure Control Plans |
| Training-intensive standards | All standards require training, but LOTO, Confined Space, and Respiratory Protection have the most detailed requirements |
| Industry-specific thresholds | Fall Protection (6 ft construction/4 ft general industry), Noise (85 dB action/90 dB PEL) |
Which two standards both require employers to maintain written programs with specific procedural elements, and what distinguishes the hazards each addresses?
If an employee is injured by a workplace hazard not covered by any specific OSHA standard, under what regulation could OSHA still cite the employer, and what must OSHA prove?
Compare and contrast the Hazard Communication Standard and the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard—what "right to know" principle do they share, and how do their documentation requirements differ?
An FRQ describes a manufacturing facility where workers service heavy machinery. Which standard would most directly apply to protecting workers during equipment maintenance, and what are its three key components?
Why does OSHA use different height thresholds for fall protection in construction (6 feet) versus general industry (4 feet), and what does this reveal about how OSHA develops industry-specific standards?