upgrade
upgrade

💳Intro to FinTech

Major FinTech Companies

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Understanding major FinTech companies isn't just about memorizing who does what—it's about recognizing the business models and technological innovations that are fundamentally reshaping financial services. These companies represent distinct approaches to solving financial friction: payment processing, democratized investing, alternative lending, digital banking, and cryptocurrency infrastructure. On your exam, you'll need to identify which companies exemplify which disruption strategies and explain how they challenge traditional financial institutions.

The companies below aren't organized alphabetically or by valuation. Instead, they're grouped by the core problem they solve and the revenue model they employ. When you see a question about BNPL disruption or neobanking, you should immediately know which companies to reference. Don't just memorize founding dates—know what concept each company illustrates and how their approaches compare.


Payment Processing Pioneers

These companies built the infrastructure that makes digital transactions possible. Their core innovation: reducing friction between buyers and sellers by handling the complex backend of moving money electronically.

PayPal

  • First-mover advantage in digital payments—founded in 1998, PayPal established consumer trust in online transactions before most people shopped on the internet
  • Platform network effects create a competitive moat; millions of merchants accept PayPal because millions of consumers use it, and vice versa
  • Horizontal expansion strategy now includes peer-to-peer transfers (Venmo), cryptocurrency trading, and BNPL services through acquisitions

Stripe

  • Developer-first business model—Stripe's API-centric approach lets businesses integrate payment processing with just a few lines of code
  • B2B focus differentiates it from consumer-facing competitors; Stripe powers payments for Shopify, Lyft, and thousands of startups
  • Global payment infrastructure supports 135+ currencies and dozens of payment methods, solving cross-border commerce complexity

Square (Block)

  • Hardware-software integration disrupted point-of-sale systems by letting any smartphone become a card reader for small businesses
  • Ecosystem strategy expanded from payments into business loans (Square Capital), payroll, and consumer banking (Cash App)
  • Rebranding to Block signals strategic pivot toward blockchain technology and decentralized finance infrastructure

Compare: Stripe vs. Square—both process payments, but Stripe targets online businesses through APIs while Square started with physical retail through hardware. If an FRQ asks about different approaches to merchant services, contrast their distribution strategies.


Democratized Investing Platforms

These companies removed traditional barriers to market participation—high fees, account minimums, and complex interfaces—making investing accessible to everyday consumers.

Robinhood

  • Commission-free trading model eliminated the $510\$5-10 per-trade fees that discouraged small investors from participating in markets
  • Payment for order flow (PFOF) revenue model routes trades through market makers who pay for the transaction data—a controversial but legal practice
  • Gamification concerns emerged as critics argued the app's design encourages risky trading behavior, especially among younger users

Coinbase

  • Cryptocurrency on-ramp provides the easiest way for mainstream consumers to convert dollars into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets
  • Regulatory compliance focus differentiates Coinbase from offshore exchanges; it's publicly traded on NASDAQ and works with U.S. regulators
  • Revenue vulnerability tied to crypto market volatility—trading fees drop dramatically during bear markets when fewer users transact

Compare: Robinhood vs. Coinbase—both democratized access to asset classes (stocks vs. crypto), both face regulatory scrutiny, but their revenue models differ. Robinhood uses PFOF while Coinbase charges direct transaction fees.


Alternative Lending and BNPL

These companies reimagined credit by using technology and alternative data to underwrite loans faster and offer flexible payment options outside traditional credit systems.

Klarna

  • Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) pioneer—founded in 2005, Klarna popularized splitting purchases into interest-free installments at checkout
  • Merchant-funded model means retailers pay Klarna fees because BNPL increases conversion rates and average order values
  • Regulatory attention growing as consumer advocates worry BNPL encourages overspending without traditional credit card protections

SoFi

  • Full-stack personal finance combines student loans, personal loans, mortgages, investing, and banking in one integrated platform
  • Refinancing disruption started by helping graduates consolidate student debt at lower rates than federal programs offered
  • Bank charter acquisition in 2022 allows SoFi to hold deposits directly, reducing reliance on partner banks and improving margins

Compare: Klarna vs. SoFi—both offer alternatives to traditional credit, but Klarna focuses on short-term, point-of-sale financing while SoFi provides longer-term lending products. Klarna's model is merchant-funded; SoFi earns interest directly from borrowers.


Digital-First Banking (Neobanks)

Neobanks operate without physical branches, using lower overhead costs to offer fee-free accounts and customer-friendly features that traditional banks struggle to match.

Chime

  • No-fee banking model eliminates monthly maintenance fees, overdraft charges, and minimum balance requirements that penalize lower-income customers
  • Early direct deposit feature releases paychecks up to two days early by advancing funds before official settlement—a major draw for users
  • Interchange revenue from debit card transactions funds the business; Chime earns a percentage every time customers swipe their cards

Revolut

  • Multi-currency functionality lets users hold, exchange, and spend in dozens of currencies at interbank rates without foreign transaction fees
  • Super-app ambition bundles banking, crypto trading, stock investing, and budgeting tools into one platform—following the WeChat model
  • Global expansion strategy targets international travelers and expats who need seamless cross-border financial services

Compare: Chime vs. Revolut—both are neobanks eliminating traditional fees, but Chime focuses on underserved U.S. consumers while Revolut targets globally mobile users. Their core value propositions differ: financial inclusion vs. international flexibility.


Super-App and Ecosystem Players

These companies leverage massive existing user bases to offer comprehensive financial services, particularly dominant in markets where mobile-first finance leapfrogged traditional banking.

Ant Financial (Ant Group)

  • Alipay dominance processes over $17\$17 trillion in annual transactions, making it the world's largest mobile payment platform by volume
  • Super-app ecosystem integrates payments, wealth management (Yu'e Bao), microloans, and credit scoring into one platform serving over 1 billion users
  • Regulatory challenges halted its 2020 IPO; Chinese government concerns about systemic risk and data control reshaped the company's trajectory

Compare: Ant Financial vs. PayPal—both started in payments but evolved differently. Ant built a closed ecosystem within China's unique regulatory environment, while PayPal expanded through acquisitions in Western markets. Ant's scale dwarfs PayPal's, but regulatory risk proved more severe.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Payment Processing InfrastructurePayPal, Stripe, Square
Commission-Free TradingRobinhood, Coinbase
Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL)Klarna
Neobanking / Digital-First BanksChime, Revolut
Full-Stack Personal FinanceSoFi
Super-App / Ecosystem ModelAnt Financial
Developer-First / API StrategyStripe
Hardware-Software IntegrationSquare
Cryptocurrency ExchangeCoinbase
Regulatory Disruption RiskAnt Financial, Robinhood

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two companies both disrupted traditional fee structures but targeted completely different customer segments (retail investors vs. banking customers)?

  2. Compare and contrast Stripe and Square's approaches to payment processing. What type of merchant does each primarily serve, and how do their distribution strategies differ?

  3. If an exam question asks you to explain how FinTech companies generate revenue without charging consumers directly, which three companies would best illustrate different indirect revenue models?

  4. What regulatory risks do Robinhood, Klarna, and Ant Financial each face, and how do these risks reflect broader concerns about FinTech disruption?

  5. A free-response question asks: "Explain how neobanks challenge traditional banking business models." Which companies would you reference, and what specific features demonstrate their competitive advantages?