Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Evolutionary theories aren't just historical curiosities—they're the conceptual toolkit you need to explain how and why life changes over time. Your exam will test whether you understand the mechanisms driving evolutionary change: natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, gene flow, and non-traditional inheritance patterns. Each theory in this guide represents a different answer to the question "What causes evolution?"—and you'll need to know when each explanation applies.
These theories also reveal how scientific thinking itself evolves. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish between gradualism and punctuated change, between selection-driven and drift-driven evolution, and between vertical and horizontal inheritance. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what problem each theory solves and what evidence supports it. That's what separates a 3 from a 5.
These theories establish natural selection as the primary mechanism of adaptive evolution. Organisms with traits that enhance survival and reproduction pass those traits to offspring at higher rates, shifting population characteristics over generations.
Compare: Darwin's original theory vs. Modern Synthesis—both center on natural selection, but Darwin couldn't explain inheritance mechanisms. The Modern Synthesis added genetics, making evolution mathematically testable. If an FRQ asks about the "complete" explanation of evolution, Modern Synthesis is your answer.
Not all evolutionary change is slow and steady. These theories propose that evolution can occur in bursts, through random processes, or via mechanisms beyond classical selection.
Compare: Punctuated Equilibrium vs. Neutral Theory—both challenge strict gradualism, but for different reasons. Punctuated equilibrium focuses on tempo (when change happens), while neutral theory focuses on mechanism (drift vs. selection). Know which applies to morphological vs. molecular evolution.
These theories emphasize that what genes do matters as much as what genes exist. Changes in developmental timing and gene expression can produce dramatic evolutionary innovations.
Compare: Evo-Devo vs. Epigenetics—both focus on gene regulation rather than gene sequence, but Evo-Devo examines how developmental programs evolve over generations, while epigenetics examines how environmental signals modify expression within and across generations. FRQs may ask you to distinguish genetic from epigenetic inheritance.
Classical evolution assumes genes pass from parent to offspring. These theories reveal that genetic information can move sideways between organisms or arise from mergers between species.
Compare: Horizontal Gene Transfer vs. Endosymbiotic Theory—both involve genetic material moving between organisms, but HGT transfers individual genes (common in prokaryotes), while endosymbiosis transfers entire genomes through cellular engulfment (rare but transformative). Both challenge strictly vertical inheritance models.
Classical theory focuses on individual fitness, but selection may operate at multiple levels simultaneously.
Compare: Group Selection vs. Kin Selection (related concept)—group selection operates on any group, while kin selection specifically explains altruism toward genetic relatives through inclusive fitness. Many behaviors once attributed to group selection are now explained by kin selection, but true group selection may still occur.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Selection as primary mechanism | Darwin's Natural Selection, Modern Synthesis |
| Non-gradual evolutionary tempo | Punctuated Equilibrium |
| Drift-driven molecular change | Neutral Theory |
| Gene regulation over gene sequence | Evo-Devo, Epigenetic Inheritance |
| Non-vertical inheritance | Horizontal Gene Transfer, Endosymbiotic Theory |
| Symbiosis as evolutionary driver | Symbiogenesis, Endosymbiotic Theory |
| Multi-level selection | Group Selection Theory |
| Explains molecular clock | Neutral Theory |
Which two theories both challenge the idea that evolution is always gradual, and how do their explanations differ?
If you observed that two distantly related bacterial species share an identical antibiotic resistance gene, which theory best explains this—and why wouldn't classical vertical inheritance account for it?
Compare and contrast Evo-Devo and Epigenetic Inheritance: what do they share in their focus, and how do their timescales and mechanisms differ?
An FRQ asks you to explain how mitochondria provide evidence for a non-traditional mode of evolution. Which theory would you use, and what three pieces of evidence would you cite?
Why might a population geneticist use Neutral Theory to estimate when two species diverged, even if they believe natural selection shaped most visible traits?