Learning Styles Models

Why This Matters

Learning styles models represent one of the most debated topics in educational psychology—and that's exactly why you need to understand them deeply. You're being tested not just on what each model proposes, but on the theoretical assumptions underlying them, their research validity, and how they've shaped (and sometimes misguided) instructional practice. These models connect to broader course concepts like individual differences, differentiation, cognitive processing, and evidence-based practice.

Here's what makes this topic tricky: many of these models remain popular in schools despite limited empirical support. Your job is to understand each model's structure, recognize what it claims about learners, and critically evaluate its applications. Don't just memorize the categories—know what type of learner characteristic each model emphasizes and whether the research backs it up.

---

Experiential and Cyclical Models

These models frame learning as a process rather than a fixed trait. They emphasize that learners move through stages or phases, and preferences emerge from where individuals spend the most time in the cycle. The underlying principle is that learning involves both experience and reflection working together.

Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory

• Four-stage learning cycle—Concrete Experience → Reflective Observation → Abstract Conceptualization → Active Experimentation, forming a continuous loop
• Four learning styles emerge from the cycle: Diverging, Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating, based on which stages a learner prefers
• Rooted in Dewey and Piaget—positions learning as transformation of experience, not passive reception of information

Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles

• Direct adaptation of Kolb—translates the four stages into practitioner-friendly labels: Activists, Reflectors, Theorists, and Pragmatists
• Activists prefer immediate experience; Reflectors observe before acting; Theorists need logical frameworks; Pragmatists want real-world application
• Designed for professional development—originally created for management training, making it more applied than theoretical

---

Sensory and Modality-Based Models

These models categorize learners by their preferred input channel—how they best receive information. The assumption is that matching instruction to sensory preference improves learning outcomes, though this "meshing hypothesis" lacks strong empirical support.

VARK Model (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, Kinesthetic)

• Four modality preferences—Visual (diagrams, charts), Auditory (lectures, discussion), Reading/Writing (text-based), Kinesthetic (hands-on, movement)
• Multimodal learners are common—Fleming's research suggests most people don't fit neatly into one category
• Popular but contested—widely used in K-12 settings despite research showing that matching modality to instruction doesn't consistently improve outcomes

Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model

• Four dimensions, not categories—Active/Reflective, Sensing/Intuitive, Visual/Verbal, Sequential/Global, creating a profile rather than a single label
• Developed for engineering education—specifically designed to address why some students struggle in technical fields
• Emphasizes balanced instruction—argues teachers should vary methods across dimensions rather than label students

---

Multiple Intelligences and Cognitive Profiles

Rather than focusing on how learners receive information, these models propose that people have different cognitive strengths. The theoretical shift here is from learning "styles" to learning "abilities"—a crucial distinction for exam purposes.

Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences

• Eight distinct intelligences—Linguistic, Logical-Mathematical, Spatial, Bodily-Kinesthetic, Musical, Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Naturalistic
• Challenges traditional IQ—argues that a single intelligence score fails to capture the full range of human cognitive abilities
• Influential but not empirically validated—widely adopted in education despite Gardner himself noting it's a theory, not proven science

---

Environmental and Holistic Models

These models take the broadest view, arguing that learning preferences extend beyond cognition to include physical environment, emotional states, and social context. They treat the learner as a whole person affected by multiple interacting factors.

Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model

• Five stimulus categories—Environmental (lighting, sound, temperature), Emotional (motivation, persistence), Sociological (alone vs. groups), Physiological (time of day, mobility needs), Psychological (analytic vs. global)
• Most comprehensive model—accounts for 21 different elements that may affect learning
• Emphasizes personalized environments—suggests physical classroom setup matters as much as instructional method

Gregorc's Mind Styles Model

• Two perception dimensions—Concrete (physical, hands-on) vs. Abstract (ideas, concepts); two ordering dimensions—Sequential (step-by-step) vs. Random (nonlinear)
• Four resulting styles—Concrete Sequential, Abstract Sequential, Abstract Random, Concrete Random, each with distinct processing preferences
• Focus on information processing—less about input modality and more about how learners organize and make sense of information

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. What is the key difference between Gardner's Multiple Intelligences and sensory-based models like VARK? Why does this distinction matter for educational practice?

2. Both Kolb and Honey and Mumford propose four learning styles—how are their models related, and which would you cite in an academic context versus a practitioner setting?

3. If a teacher redesigns her classroom lighting, seating arrangements, and background noise levels based on student preferences, which learning styles model is she applying?

4. Compare and contrast Felder-Silverman with VARK: How do their structures differ (dimensional vs. categorical), and what does Felder-Silverman include that VARK does not?

5. An FRQ asks you to critically evaluate the use of learning styles in classroom instruction. Which models would you discuss, and what would you say about the research evidence for the "meshing hypothesis"?