Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Kinematics is the foundation of everything you'll study in mechanics, and mechanics typically makes up the largest portion of your introductory physics exams. These equations describe how objects move through space and time, connecting displacement, velocity, acceleration, and time in predictable ways. Master these relationships, and you'll have the tools to analyze everything from a ball thrown in the air to a car braking at a stoplight.
What you're really being tested on is not just plugging numbers into formulas, but choosing the right equation for each problem. Every kinematics equation leaves out one variable, and that's your key to solving problems efficiently. You also need to understand when these equations apply (constant acceleration only) and how to interpret their physical meaning. Don't just memorize the formulas. Know what each one tells you about motion and when to reach for it.
Before getting into the main kinematics equations, you need to understand the definitions that underpin them. These define what velocity and acceleration actually mean and apply to all motion scenarios.
defines velocity as displacement divided by time for constant-velocity motion. This is only valid when acceleration is zero, making it your starting point for uniform motion problems.
It rearranges to , which you'll use constantly for objects moving at steady speed.
defines acceleration as the rate of change of velocity.
Be careful with signs here. Positive acceleration means velocity is becoming more positive over time. That doesn't always mean "speeding up." An object moving in the negative direction with positive acceleration is actually slowing down. Always think about the direction of motion and the direction of acceleration separately.
This definition rearranges directly into the first kinematic equation, making it foundational for all accelerated motion.
gives the average velocity as the arithmetic mean of initial and final velocities. This is only valid for constant acceleration; if acceleration changes over time, the velocity doesn't change linearly, so a simple average of endpoints won't give you the true average.
It connects to displacement through , giving you an alternative problem-solving path.
Compare: Velocity definition vs. Average velocity: both relate displacement to time, but assumes constant velocity throughout, while accounts for uniformly changing velocity. Use average velocity when acceleration is present.
These are your primary problem-solving tools for constant acceleration. Each equation connects four of the five kinematic variables (, , , , ), leaving one out. That missing variable is how you choose which equation to use.
This is derived directly from the definition of acceleration, just rearranged. Use it when displacement isn't given or needed. A typical prompt: "How fast is it going after 5 seconds?"
On a velocity-time graph, this equation represents a straight line where is the slope and is the y-intercept.
This calculates displacement without needing final velocity. The term represents the extra displacement caused by acceleration, beyond what the initial velocity alone would produce.
This is the most common equation for projectile problems where you know initial conditions and time but not final speed.
This is the time-independent equation, connecting velocities directly to displacement. Use it when time isn't given. A typical prompt: "How fast is the car going after traveling 100 meters?"
This equation is closely related to the work-energy theorem, which you'll encounter later in the course.
Compare: Position-time vs. Velocity-displacement: both involve displacement, but requires knowing time, while requires knowing final velocity (or lets you solve for it). If a problem gives you distance and asks for final speed with no time mentioned, reach for the velocity-displacement equation.
This calculates displacement using average velocity. Use it when acceleration isn't given but you know both initial and final velocities plus time.
Graphically, this is equivalent to finding the area of a trapezoid under a velocity-time graph.
This gives the final position, not just displacement. Use it when the starting position isn't zero, which matters in problems with defined coordinate systems. When , this reduces to the position-time equation above.
Compare: vs. : the first gives displacement (change in position), the second gives final position. When a problem asks "where is the object?" use the full equation. When it asks "how far did it travel?" use the displacement form.
When you're staring at a problem, follow these steps:
| Missing Variable | Equation | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Finding final velocity when distance doesn't matter | ||
| Projectile motion, finding distance traveled | ||
| Braking problems, runway calculations | ||
| When acceleration isn't provided directly | ||
| Finding displacement from final conditions | ||
| None (definition) | Calculating acceleration from velocity change | |
| None (constant ) | Uniform motion, no acceleration |
An object accelerates uniformly from rest. Which equation would you use to find its displacement after 4 seconds if you don't know its final velocity?
Both and can find final velocity. What determines which one you should use?
A car brakes to a stop over a known distance. You want to find how long the braking took. Which variable is "missing" from your known quantities, and which equation should you use?
Why does the average velocity equation only work for constant acceleration? What would change if acceleration varied?
A ball is thrown straight upward and you need to find the maximum height. Which kinematic equation is most efficient, and what value do you substitute for ?