Key Turbulence Models to Know for Mathematical Fluid Dynamics

Turbulence models are essential in Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, helping to predict complex flow behaviors. Key models like RANS, k-ε, and LES balance accuracy and efficiency, making them vital for engineering applications and understanding turbulent flows in various scenarios.

  1. Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations

    • RANS equations are derived from the Navier-Stokes equations by averaging the flow variables over time.
    • They account for the effects of turbulence by introducing a turbulence model to close the equations.
    • RANS is widely used in engineering applications due to its balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.
  2. k-ε model

    • The k-ε model is a two-equation turbulence model that solves for the turbulent kinetic energy (k) and its dissipation rate (ε).
    • It is effective for a wide range of turbulent flows, particularly in wall-bounded flows.
    • The model is relatively simple and computationally inexpensive, making it popular in industrial applications.
  3. k-ω model

    • The k-ω model is another two-equation turbulence model that solves for turbulent kinetic energy (k) and the specific dissipation rate (ω).
    • It performs better than the k-ε model in predicting flows with strong adverse pressure gradients and near-wall behavior.
    • The k-ω model is sensitive to the choice of boundary conditions, which can affect its accuracy.
  4. Spalart-Allmaras model

    • The Spalart-Allmaras model is a one-equation turbulence model primarily used for aerodynamic applications.
    • It simplifies the turbulence modeling process by solving a single transport equation for a modified turbulent viscosity.
    • This model is particularly effective for attached flows and is often used in aerospace engineering.
  5. Large Eddy Simulation (LES)

    • LES is a simulation technique that resolves large-scale turbulent structures while modeling the smaller scales.
    • It provides a more detailed representation of turbulence compared to RANS, making it suitable for complex flow scenarios.
    • LES requires significant computational resources, but it offers improved accuracy for transient and unsteady flows.
  6. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS)

    • DNS involves solving the Navier-Stokes equations directly without any turbulence modeling, capturing all scales of motion.
    • It provides the most accurate representation of turbulence but is computationally expensive and limited to low Reynolds number flows.
    • DNS is primarily used for fundamental research and validation of turbulence models.
  7. Detached Eddy Simulation (DES)

    • DES combines features of RANS and LES, using RANS in the near-wall region and LES in the free stream.
    • This hybrid approach allows for efficient computation while capturing the effects of large-scale turbulence.
    • DES is particularly useful for flows with separation and complex geometries.
  8. Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)

    • RSM is a more complex turbulence model that solves transport equations for the Reynolds stresses directly.
    • It provides a more accurate representation of anisotropic turbulence compared to simpler models like k-ε and k-ω.
    • RSM is suitable for flows with significant rotational effects and complex turbulence structures.
  9. Algebraic stress model

    • The algebraic stress model is a simplified approach that relates the Reynolds stresses to the mean strain rates using algebraic equations.
    • It is less computationally intensive than RSM while still capturing some effects of turbulence anisotropy.
    • This model is often used in conjunction with RANS equations for practical engineering applications.
  10. Smagorinsky model

    • The Smagorinsky model is a subgrid-scale model used in LES to estimate the effects of unresolved turbulence.
    • It introduces a coefficient that relates the subgrid-scale stresses to the local strain rate, providing a closure for the LES equations.
    • The model is simple and widely used, but its accuracy can depend on the choice of the Smagorinsky constant.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.