Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
International trade law isn't just a collection of acronyms to memorize—it's the operating system that makes global commerce possible. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate understanding of how nations balance competing interests: protecting domestic industries vs. promoting free trade, enforcing intellectual property rights vs. ensuring access to innovation, and preventing corruption vs. facilitating international business relationships. These tensions drive every regulation and treaty you'll encounter.
The regulations and treaties in this guide fall into distinct categories based on what problem they solve: reducing trade barriers, standardizing commercial practices, protecting intellectual property, or preventing unfair competition. Don't just memorize that GATT exists—know that it represents the foundational shift toward multilateral trade liberalization. Understanding the function of each regulation will help you tackle FRQ scenarios where you must apply these frameworks to real business situations.
These agreements establish the foundational rules that govern how nations trade with each other. The core principle is reciprocity—countries agree to lower barriers in exchange for similar treatment from trading partners.
Compare: GATT/WTO vs. Free Trade Agreements—both reduce trade barriers, but WTO applies globally with modest reductions while FTAs create deeper integration among fewer countries. If an FRQ asks about a company choosing where to manufacture, FTA provisions on rules of origin are your key concept.
These frameworks solve the practical problem of doing business across different legal systems. Without standardized terms and rules, every international contract would require extensive negotiation over basic definitions.
Compare: Incoterms vs. CISG—Incoterms define delivery and risk allocation within a contract, while CISG provides the legal framework governing the entire contract. A well-drafted international sales agreement uses both: Incoterms for logistics, CISG (or an opt-out) for legal disputes.
TRIPS represents the globalization of IP enforcement, requiring all WTO members to meet minimum protection standards. The underlying tension is between rewarding innovation and ensuring public access to knowledge.
Compare: TRIPS vs. Domestic IP Law—TRIPS sets the floor, not the ceiling. U.S. patent law may exceed TRIPS requirements, but no WTO member can fall below them. FRQs often test whether you understand this minimum-standards approach.
These regulations address market distortions caused by bribery and predatory pricing. Both aim to ensure that competitive success reflects genuine business merit rather than corrupt payments or artificially low prices.
Compare: FCPA vs. Anti-Dumping Laws—both address unfair competitive advantages, but FCPA targets how business is obtained (corruption) while anti-dumping laws target pricing strategies. FCPA violations are criminal; anti-dumping remedies are tariff-based.
These regulations reflect national sovereignty concerns—governments retain authority to restrict trade for security, revenue, or policy reasons. Even in a free-trade world, certain controls remain non-negotiable.
Compare: Export Controls vs. Customs/Tariffs—export controls restrict what leaves the country (security focus), while customs regulations govern what enters (revenue and protection focus). A company engaged in international trade must navigate both systems simultaneously.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Multilateral trade liberalization | GATT, WTO Agreements |
| Regional economic integration | NAFTA, USMCA, other FTAs |
| Contract standardization | CISG, Incoterms |
| Intellectual property harmonization | TRIPS |
| Anti-corruption enforcement | FCPA |
| Unfair trade remedies | Anti-dumping laws |
| National security controls | Export control regulations |
| Border controls and revenue | Customs regulations and tariffs |
Both GATT and regional FTAs aim to reduce trade barriers—what distinguishes their scope and depth of commitments?
A U.S. company is drafting an international sales contract with a German buyer. Which two frameworks (one for delivery terms, one for contract law) should they consider, and what does each govern?
How does TRIPS balance the interests of intellectual property holders against public access concerns, and what flexibility does it provide developing nations?
Compare the FCPA and anti-dumping laws: what type of unfair competitive advantage does each address, and how do their enforcement mechanisms differ?
FRQ-style prompt: A U.S. technology company wants to sell software with encryption capabilities to a customer in a country subject to trade restrictions. Identify which regulatory frameworks apply and explain the compliance steps required before the sale can proceed.