Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Quality improvement isn't just a buzzword in healthcare—it's the systematic backbone of how organizations reduce harm, improve outcomes, and deliver better care. When you're tested on QI models, you're really being assessed on your understanding of how change happens in complex systems, why certain approaches work for different problems, and when to apply proactive versus reactive strategies. These models show up repeatedly in exam questions about patient safety, organizational leadership, and evidence-based practice.
Here's the key insight: each model was designed to solve a specific type of problem. Some excel at rapid testing of small changes, others at eliminating defects, and still others at understanding failures after they occur. Don't just memorize acronyms—know what problem each model solves and how it approaches improvement. That's what separates surface-level recall from the comparative thinking examiners want to see.
These models emphasize iterative experimentation—testing small changes quickly, learning from results, and adapting. The core principle is that improvement happens through repeated cycles of action and reflection, not through perfect planning.
Compare: PDSA vs. IHI Model for Improvement—both use iterative testing cycles, but the IHI model adds explicit goal-setting and measurement frameworks upfront. If an exam question asks about structured improvement initiatives with defined targets, the IHI model is your answer.
These approaches focus on reducing variation and errors through rigorous statistical analysis. The underlying principle is that defects are measurable, their causes are identifiable, and processes can be engineered to near-perfection.
Compare: Six Sigma vs. Lean Six Sigma—Six Sigma focuses primarily on reducing defects through statistical control, while Lean Six Sigma adds waste elimination. Choose Lean Six Sigma when the problem involves both quality defects AND inefficient resource use.
These models target non-value-added activities—anything that consumes resources without benefiting patients. The core insight is that eliminating waste improves both efficiency and quality simultaneously.
Compare: Lean vs. TQM—Lean provides specific tools for identifying and eliminating waste, while TQM offers a broader philosophical framework for quality culture. Lean answers "how do we fix this process?" while TQM answers "how do we become a quality-focused organization?"
These models are deployed after problems occur to understand what went wrong and prevent recurrence. The principle here is that adverse events contain valuable information—systematic analysis transforms failures into learning opportunities.
Compare: RCA vs. CQI—RCA is triggered by specific adverse events and looks backward, while CQI is an ongoing process that monitors performance continuously. RCA asks "what went wrong?" while CQI asks "how are we doing overall?"
These models identify potential failures before they occur. The underlying principle is that anticipating problems is more effective than reacting to them—prevention beats correction.
Compare: FMEA vs. RCA—both analyze failures, but FMEA is proactive (before events occur) while RCA is reactive (after events occur). If an exam asks about preventing errors in a new process, FMEA is correct; if it asks about investigating an incident, RCA is correct.
These models provide conceptual structures for assessing quality rather than step-by-step improvement methods. They answer the question: what does quality actually mean, and how do we measure it comprehensively?
Compare: Donabedian Model vs. other QI models—Donabedian is an evaluation framework, not an improvement methodology. It tells you what to measure, not how to improve. Pair it with PDSA or Lean when you need both assessment and action.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Rapid-cycle testing | PDSA, IHI Model for Improvement |
| Defect elimination | Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma |
| Waste reduction | Lean Methodology, TQM |
| Reactive analysis | RCA, CQI |
| Proactive risk assessment | FMEA |
| Quality evaluation framework | Donabedian Model |
| Statistical process control | Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma |
| Organization-wide culture change | TQM, CQI |
A hospital wants to test whether a new hand-hygiene reminder system improves compliance before rolling it out organization-wide. Which model is most appropriate, and why?
Compare and contrast FMEA and RCA: What type of problem does each address, and when would you choose one over the other?
Which two models both emphasize waste elimination, and how do their approaches differ?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate a hospital's quality using multiple dimensions. Which framework provides the conceptual structure, and what are its three components?
A quality team wants to reduce medication errors to near-zero levels using statistical methods. Which model targets a specific defect rate, and what is that target?