Why This Matters
Film movements aren't just historical footnotes—they're the conceptual toolkit you need to analyze why directors make specific choices. When you're asked to discuss mise-en-scène, editing techniques, or narrative structure on an exam, you're really being tested on whether you understand how these movements revolutionized cinematic language. Each movement emerged as a response to something: political upheaval, technological innovation, rejection of commercial conventions, or philosophical shifts in how artists understood reality and representation.
Don't just memorize dates and director names. Know what problem each movement was solving and what techniques it pioneered. When an FRQ asks you to analyze a film's visual style or ideological stance, you should immediately recognize which movement's DNA is at work—and be able to explain the "why" behind the "what." That comparative thinking is where the points are.
Movements Defined by Visual Style and Psychology
These movements prioritized how images look and feel over realistic representation, using visual distortion and stylization to externalize internal psychological states.
German Expressionism
- Distorted sets and exaggerated lighting create visual representations of psychological turmoil—architecture literally bends to reflect madness and alienation
- Anti-realist aesthetic emerged from post-WWI trauma, with angular shadows and painted backdrops rejecting the "objective" world for subjective emotional truth
- Genre influence established visual vocabulary for horror and science fiction; The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) and Metropolis (1927) remain touchstones for any film using style to convey inner darkness
Film Noir
- Low-key lighting and chiaroscuro compositions create moral ambiguity through visual means—shadows literally obscure truth and character motivation
- Archetypal characters—the femme fatale, the hard-boiled detective—embody post-WWII anxieties about gender, trust, and social order
- Existential themes of betrayal and despair in films like Double Indemnity (1944) and The Maltese Falcon (1941) shaped thriller conventions still used today
Compare: German Expressionism vs. Film Noir—both use stylized lighting and shadow to externalize psychological states, but Expressionism distorts physical space itself while Noir works within realistic settings. If an FRQ asks about visual style conveying theme, these two movements offer the richest comparison.
Movements Centered on Editing as Meaning-Making
These movements understood that cinema's unique power lies in the cut—how the juxtaposition of images creates meaning that exists in neither shot alone.
Soviet Montage
- Editing creates meaning through collision of images; Eisenstein's theory of intellectual montage argues that A + B = C (a new concept neither image contains alone)
- Political tool designed to shape revolutionary consciousness—filmmakers like Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov saw montage as ideological weapon
- Foundational techniques in Battleship Potemkin (1925) and Man with a Movie Camera (1929) established editing grammar still taught as fundamental film language
French Impressionism
- Subjective experience conveyed through innovative camera movement, superimposition, and rhythmic editing to create dreamlike, psychological states
- Time and memory explored through techniques like slow motion and optical effects, reflecting influence of Impressionist painting's interest in perception
- Artistic ambition in films like La Roue (1923) pushed cinema beyond narrative entertainment toward pure visual poetry
Compare: Soviet Montage vs. French Impressionism—both innovated editing techniques, but Soviet filmmakers used cuts for ideological impact while French Impressionists used them for emotional and perceptual exploration. One is political, one is psychological.
Movements Rejecting Artifice for Authenticity
These movements stripped away studio polish to capture something closer to lived reality, often as direct response to the escapism of mainstream cinema.
Italian Neorealism
- On-location shooting and non-professional actors rejected Hollywood artifice to portray post-WWII devastation with documentary-like immediacy
- Working-class subjects and everyday struggles took center stage; poverty and social injustice became worthy of serious cinematic attention
- Influence on global cinema through Bicycle Thieves (1948) and Rome, Open City (1945) established template for socially engaged filmmaking worldwide
Dogme 95
- "Vow of Chastity" rules prohibited artificial lighting, non-diegetic sound, and genre conventions—stripping film to essential elements of story and performance
- Manifesto-driven movement founded by Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg as deliberate provocation against Hollywood spectacle and auteur pretension
- Raw emotional intensity in The Celebration (1998) and related works proved technical limitations could heighten rather than diminish dramatic power
Compare: Italian Neorealism vs. Dogme 95—both reject artificiality for authenticity, but Neorealism emerged from post-war necessity and social conscience while Dogme 95 was a conscious artistic manifesto. Both prove that constraints can liberate creativity.
Movements Breaking Narrative Convention
These movements challenged how stories are told, rejecting classical Hollywood structure for more fragmented, self-aware, or experimental approaches.
French New Wave
- Self-reflexive techniques like jump cuts, direct address, and visible filmmaking broke the "invisible" style of classical cinema—films acknowledge they're films
- Auteur theory championed by critics-turned-directors like François Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard positioned the director as artistic author with personal vision
- Youth and existentialism in Breathless (1960) and The 400 Blows (1959) influenced independent cinema's embrace of spontaneity and personal storytelling
Czech New Wave
- Surrealism and absurdist humor masked political critique under totalitarian censorship—subversion through playfulness rather than direct confrontation
- Innovative narrative structures in films like Daisies (1966) blend satire with formal experimentation, challenging both political authority and cinematic convention
- Historical significance as artistic resistance; The Shop on Main Street (1965) used allegory to address collaboration and complicity under oppression
Compare: French New Wave vs. Czech New Wave—both rebelled against convention in the 1960s, but French filmmakers challenged aesthetic norms while Czech filmmakers used formal experimentation to challenge political authority under censorship. Context shapes what "rebellion" means.
Movements Merging Social Critique with National Identity
These movements combined formal innovation with explicit engagement with their societies' political and cultural struggles.
Cinema Novo
- "An idea in the head and a camera in the hand"—Brazilian movement combined Neorealist authenticity with New Wave experimentation to address poverty and inequality
- Decolonial perspective challenged both Hollywood dominance and Brazil's internal class and racial hierarchies through films rooted in local experience
- Cultural identity explored in Black Orpheus (1959) and The Hour of the Star (1985), which brought marginalized Brazilian voices to international attention
New Hollywood
- Anti-heroes and moral ambiguity replaced classical Hollywood's clear protagonists, reflecting Vietnam-era disillusionment and countercultural values
- Director-driven filmmaking emerged as young auteurs like Scorsese, Coppola, and Altman gained unprecedented creative control within the studio system
- Social relevance in Easy Rider (1969) and The Graduate (1967) addressed generational conflict, sexuality, and American identity with unprecedented frankness
Compare: Cinema Novo vs. New Hollywood—both emerged from 1960s political upheaval and both gave directors more control, but Cinema Novo operated from a position of economic scarcity and anti-colonial resistance while New Hollywood worked within (and eventually transformed) the commercial studio system.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Visual style externalizing psychology | German Expressionism, Film Noir |
| Editing as primary meaning-maker | Soviet Montage, French Impressionism |
| Rejection of artifice for authenticity | Italian Neorealism, Dogme 95 |
| Self-reflexive/unconventional narrative | French New Wave, Czech New Wave |
| Social critique + national identity | Cinema Novo, New Hollywood |
| Political filmmaking as explicit goal | Soviet Montage, Cinema Novo, Czech New Wave |
| Influence on genre conventions | German Expressionism (horror), Film Noir (thriller) |
| Auteur theory in practice | French New Wave, New Hollywood |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two movements both prioritize editing innovation but differ in whether their goals are political or psychological? What specific techniques distinguish them?
-
If asked to compare approaches to "authenticity" in cinema, which movements would you pair, and what historical circumstances shaped each movement's rejection of artifice?
-
How do French New Wave and Czech New Wave both challenge convention while responding to completely different political contexts? What does this reveal about the relationship between form and content?
-
Compare and contrast how German Expressionism and Film Noir use visual style to convey psychological states. What do they share, and where do their techniques diverge?
-
An FRQ asks you to discuss how a film movement can function as political resistance. Which three movements offer the strongest examples, and what specific strategies did each employ?