Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Civil rights movements are central to understanding how American democracy actually works—and where it falls short. On the AP exam, you're being tested on more than just dates and names. You need to understand how marginalized groups have used litigation, legislation, protest, and coalition-building to expand constitutional protections and challenge systemic inequality. These movements demonstrate core concepts like federalism (state vs. federal enforcement), judicial review (landmark Supreme Court cases), and linkage institutions (how social movements connect citizens to government).
Each movement you study illustrates different strategies for political change: some relied on direct action and civil disobedience, others on legal challenges through the courts, and still others on grassroots organizing and electoral politics. Don't just memorize which group did what—know why certain tactics worked in specific contexts and how movements influenced each other. Understanding these patterns will help you tackle FRQs that ask you to compare strategies or explain how civil liberties have expanded over time.
These movements used protests, boycotts, and civil disobedience to create political pressure that forced legislative change. The strategy relied on making injustice visible to generate public sympathy and congressional action.
Compare: African American Civil Rights vs. Chicano Movement—both used boycotts and marches to pressure for federal legislation, but the Chicano Movement centered labor rights and cultural identity rather than desegregation. If an FRQ asks about different movement strategies, these show how similar tactics can address distinct grievances.
Some movements achieved their biggest victories through judicial review, using the courts to establish constitutional protections when legislative action stalled. This strategy depends on sympathetic judges and strong legal precedents.
Compare: LGBTQ+ Rights vs. Disability Rights—both achieved landmark protections through federal legislation and court rulings, but LGBTQ+ rights relied more heavily on Supreme Court decisions while disability rights saw earlier legislative success. Both movements illustrate how framing (as civil rights vs. medical issues) affects political outcomes.
These movements sought not just equal treatment under existing laws but recognition of distinct legal status and cultural autonomy. Their goals often conflicted with assimilationist frameworks of other civil rights movements.
Compare: Native American vs. Asian American Movements—Native Americans sought recognition of pre-existing sovereignty and treaty rights, while Asian Americans fought for inclusion and equal treatment under existing constitutional protections. This distinction matters for FRQs about different types of rights claims.
Some movements span centuries and have distinct phases with different goals and tactics. Understanding these shifts helps explain ongoing debates within movements.
Compare: Women's Rights Movement waves vs. African American Civil Rights—the women's movement's multi-generational structure contrasts with the concentrated 1950s-60s push for Black civil rights, though both show how movements must adapt strategies as contexts change. The 19th Amendment and Voting Rights Act both expanded suffrage but through different constitutional mechanisms (amendment vs. legislation).
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Direct action/civil disobedience | Montgomery Bus Boycott, March on Washington, Stonewall Riots, 504 Sit-in |
| Landmark legislation | Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965, ADA of 1990 |
| Supreme Court victories | Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), Lawrence v. Texas (2003) |
| Constitutional amendments | 19th Amendment (women's suffrage) |
| Labor organizing as civil rights | Delano Grape Strike, United Farm Workers |
| Sovereignty/self-determination | AIM, Alcatraz occupation, tribal sovereignty claims |
| Intersectionality | Third-wave feminism, LGBTQ+ movement's attention to race |
| Challenging stereotypes | Model minority myth, social model of disability |
Which two movements achieved their most significant victories primarily through Supreme Court decisions rather than congressional legislation?
Compare the strategies of the African American Civil Rights Movement and the Disability Rights Movement—what tactics did they share, and how did the ADA's structure reflect lessons from earlier civil rights legislation?
How does the Native American Rights Movement's emphasis on sovereignty differ from other movements' demands for equal treatment under existing laws?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how social movements function as linkage institutions, which three events from different movements would you use as examples, and why?
Compare and contrast the "waves" of the Women's Rights Movement with the evolution of the LGBTQ+ Rights Movement—how did each movement's goals and tactics shift over time?