Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Social support systems are foundational to community psychology—they're the mechanisms through which individuals connect to resources, build resilience, and navigate life's challenges. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate understanding of how different support structures function, what types of assistance they provide, and why certain populations benefit from specific support configurations. This isn't just about listing who helps whom; it's about recognizing the underlying principles of reciprocity, buffering effects, and ecological fit that make support systems effective.
Think of social support as operating on multiple levels of the ecological model you've encountered throughout this course—from intimate family connections to broad community networks. Each type of support serves distinct psychological functions: emotional support validates feelings, instrumental support provides tangible aid, informational support offers guidance, and companionship support reduces isolation. Don't just memorize the ten types of support systems below—know what kind of support each provides and which populations it serves best.
These are the organic, relationship-based systems that form naturally through personal connections. Informal supports operate through existing social bonds rather than formal structures, making them highly accessible but sometimes inconsistent in availability.
Compare: Family support vs. peer support—both provide emotional validation, but family offers unconditional acceptance while peers offer experiential understanding. If an exam question asks about support for someone facing a stigmatized condition, peer support is often the stronger example because of reduced shame in disclosure.
These are formally organized structures with designated roles, policies, and resources. Institutional supports provide consistency and professional expertise but may feel less personal or accessible than informal networks.
Compare: School-based support vs. workplace support—both are setting-based institutional systems, but schools have a developmental mandate (shaping growth) while workplaces have a productivity mandate (maintaining function). This affects how support is framed and what outcomes are prioritized.
These systems emerge from communities themselves but develop formal structures over time. They blend the accessibility of informal networks with the consistency of institutions.
Compare: Community organizations vs. support groups—both emerge from shared concerns, but community organizations focus outward on systemic change while support groups focus inward on member well-being. An FRQ about empowerment might ask you to distinguish these orientations.
Technology has created new support possibilities that transcend geographic and temporal boundaries. Digital supports offer unprecedented accessibility but introduce unique challenges around authenticity and quality.
Compare: Online communities vs. in-person support groups—both connect people with shared experiences, but online communities offer anonymity and accessibility while in-person groups provide nonverbal cues and deeper relational bonds. Consider which matters more for the specific population and issue involved.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Emotional support (validation, empathy) | Family support, peer networks, religious groups |
| Instrumental support (tangible aid) | Family support, community organizations, workplace support |
| Informational support (guidance, advice) | Mental health services, school-based systems, online communities |
| Companionship support (belonging) | Peer networks, religious groups, neighborhood associations |
| Experiential knowledge | Peer support networks, support groups, online communities |
| Professional expertise | Mental health services, school-based systems, workplace EAPs |
| Advocacy and systemic change | Community organizations, neighborhood associations |
| Meaning-making and purpose | Religious/spiritual groups, support groups |
Which two support systems rely most heavily on experiential knowledge as their source of credibility, and how does this differ from the credibility base of mental health services?
Compare and contrast school-based support and workplace support: What ecological principle explains why both are effective, and what different mandates shape how each delivers support?
If a community psychologist wanted to address social isolation among elderly residents, which three support systems would be most relevant, and what type of support would each primarily provide?
How does the helper therapy principle operate in support groups, and why might this make peer-led groups more sustainable than professionally-led services?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate the strengths and limitations of online communities as social support. What two advantages and two risks should you address, and how might these vary by population?