Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
New Religious Movements (NRMs) are a goldmine for understanding how religion actually works in society—and that's exactly what you're being tested on. These groups illuminate core sociological concepts like charismatic authority, boundary maintenance, deviance labeling, and the social construction of legitimacy. When exam questions ask about secularization, religious innovation, or the tension between individual spirituality and institutional religion, NRMs provide your most compelling examples.
Don't just memorize which group believes what. Instead, focus on what each movement reveals about religious dynamics: Why do some NRMs gain mainstream acceptance while others remain stigmatized? How do charismatic leaders build and maintain authority? What social conditions give rise to new religious expressions? These are the analytical questions that separate strong exam responses from simple recall. Master the concepts these movements illustrate, and you'll be ready for anything the FRQ throws at you.
Many NRMs emerge from the vision of a single charismatic founder whose personal authority shapes the movement's trajectory. Max Weber's concept of charismatic authority—legitimacy based on extraordinary personal qualities—is essential for understanding how these groups form, evolve, and sometimes collapse.
Compare: Scientology vs. Heaven's Gate—both relied heavily on founder authority, but Scientology successfully routinized charisma into bureaucratic structures while Heaven's Gate remained dependent on Applewhite's personal leadership until its tragic end. If an FRQ asks about the "routinization of charisma," contrast these two.
NRMs exist on a spectrum from low to high tension with surrounding culture. Stark and Bainbridge's church-sect typology helps explain why some movements face intense opposition while others gradually gain acceptance.
Compare: Branch Davidians vs. Jehovah's Witnesses—both maintain high tension with society, but Jehovah's Witnesses achieved stability through routinization and legal advocacy for religious freedom, while the Branch Davidians' apocalyptic urgency led to violent confrontation. Use this to discuss how NRMs manage tension differently.
Many NRMs blend elements from multiple traditions, creating novel belief systems that reflect broader cultural currents. Syncretism—the merging of different religious or cultural elements—reveals how religion adapts to changing social contexts.
Compare: Raëlism vs. Hare Krishna—both brought "foreign" worldviews to Western audiences, but ISKCON drew on an established tradition while Raëlism created an entirely novel mythology. This distinction matters for questions about religious authenticity and legitimation strategies.
Some movements that began as stigmatized NRMs have achieved varying degrees of mainstream acceptance. The process of denominationalization shows how religious groups can reduce tension with society over time.
Compare: Mormonism vs. Scientology—both American-born NRMs seeking legitimacy, but Mormonism's 190-year history and demographic growth have brought near-mainstream status, while Scientology remains highly controversial. This illustrates how time, adaptation, and public relations shape religious legitimation.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Charismatic Authority | Scientology (Hubbard), Unification Church (Moon), Heaven's Gate (Applewhite) |
| Routinization of Charisma | Scientology, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses |
| High Tension with Society | Branch Davidians, Falun Gong, Heaven's Gate |
| Boundary Maintenance | Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Branch Davidians |
| Syncretism/Innovation | Raëlism, Wicca, Hare Krishna |
| State Persecution | Falun Gong, early Mormonism, Branch Davidians |
| Denominationalization | Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses |
| Apocalyptic Beliefs | Heaven's Gate, Branch Davidians |
Which two movements best illustrate the contrast between successful and failed routinization of charismatic authority, and what factors explain the difference?
Using Stark and Bainbridge's tension framework, compare how Jehovah's Witnesses and the Branch Davidians managed their relationship with mainstream society differently.
If an FRQ asked you to explain how an NRM achieves mainstream legitimacy, which movement would you choose and what specific adaptations would you discuss?
Both Raëlism and Heaven's Gate incorporate extraterrestrial beliefs—what distinguishes their approaches, and what does this reveal about the range of NRM outcomes?
How does the persecution of Falun Gong illustrate the sociological concept of deviance labeling, and why does political context matter for understanding which groups get labeled as "dangerous cults"?