Why This Matters
Elimination reactions are one of the fundamental reaction types you'll encounter throughout organic chemistry, and they're tested heavily because they require you to integrate multiple concepts simultaneously: mechanism, stereochemistry, kinetics, and product prediction. When you see an alkyl halide or alcohol on an exam, you need to immediately assess whether substitution or elimination will dominate—and if elimination wins, which mechanism (E1, E2, or E1cB) will operate and which alkene will form.
The key to mastering elimination reactions isn't memorizing each mechanism in isolation—it's understanding how substrate structure, base strength, and solvent choice work together to determine the outcome. You're being tested on your ability to predict products, draw mechanisms, and explain why certain conditions favor certain pathways. Don't just memorize that E2 needs a strong base; know that the concerted mechanism requires simultaneous bond-breaking and bond-forming, which demands a base strong enough to abstract a proton as the leaving group departs.
Elimination Mechanisms
The three elimination mechanisms differ fundamentally in their timing of bond-breaking events—whether proton removal and leaving group departure happen simultaneously, sequentially, or in reverse order.
E1 (Elimination Unimolecular) Reaction
- Two-step mechanism with carbocation intermediate—the leaving group departs first, creating a carbocation that then loses a β-hydrogen to form the alkene
- Rate = k[substrate] because only the substrate is involved in the rate-determining ionization step; the base doesn't appear in the rate law
- Favored by tertiary substrates and polar protic solvents—carbocation stability is everything, and solvents like water or alcohols stabilize the charged intermediate through solvation
E2 (Elimination Bimolecular) Reaction
- One-step concerted mechanism—the base abstracts a β-hydrogen while the leaving group departs simultaneously, with no intermediate formed
- Rate = k[substrate][base] because both species are involved in the single transition state; strong bases like hydroxide, alkoxides, or DBU are required
- Anti-periplanar geometry is mandatory—the β-hydrogen and leaving group must be 180° apart for proper orbital overlap in the transition state
E1cB (Elimination Unimolecular Conjugate Base) Reaction
- Two-step mechanism with carbanion intermediate—the β-hydrogen is removed first by base, forming a carbanion that then expels the leaving group
- Requires electron-withdrawing groups adjacent to the β-carbon to stabilize the carbanion intermediate; common with β-keto esters and nitro compounds
- Favored when the leaving group is poor but the proton is acidic—the opposite situation from E1, where the leaving group departs first
Compare: E1 vs. E2 vs. E1cB—all produce alkenes, but the order of bond-breaking differs entirely. E1 loses the leaving group first (carbocation), E1cB loses the proton first (carbanion), and E2 does both simultaneously. If an FRQ asks you to distinguish mechanisms, focus on the intermediate: carbocation, carbanion, or none.
When multiple β-hydrogens are available, regiochemistry determines which alkene predominates. The competition between thermodynamic and kinetic control drives product distribution.
Zaitsev's Rule
- More substituted alkene is the major product—applies to most E1 and E2 reactions because the more substituted alkene is thermodynamically more stable
- Stability comes from hyperconjugation—alkyl groups donate electron density into the π∗ orbital, stabilizing the double bond; more substituents = more hyperconjugation
- Default assumption on exams unless told otherwise—if a question doesn't specify a bulky base, predict the Zaitsev product
Hofmann Elimination
- Less substituted alkene is the major product—occurs when steric factors prevent the base from accessing the more hindered β-hydrogen
- Bulky bases like potassium tert-butoxide favor Hofmann products because they can only reach the most accessible (least substituted) protons
- Also favored with charged leaving groups—quaternary ammonium salts undergo Hofmann elimination because the positive charge makes the transition state more product-like, favoring the less stable alkene
Compare: Zaitsev vs. Hofmann—same substrate can give different major products depending on base choice. Small bases (NaOH, NaOEt) → Zaitsev product. Bulky bases (t-BuOK) → Hofmann product. This is a classic exam question setup.
Common Elimination Reaction Types
These specific reactions appear frequently because they represent practical synthetic transformations with predictable outcomes.
Dehydration of Alcohols
- Alcohols lose water to form alkenes when heated with acid catalysts like concentrated H2SO4 or H3PO4
- Proceeds through E1 mechanism—the acid protonates the hydroxyl group, converting it to a good leaving group (water), followed by carbocation formation and proton loss
- Rearrangements are possible because carbocation intermediates can undergo hydride or methyl shifts to form more stable cations; always check for rearrangement potential
Dehydrohalogenation
- Removal of HX from an alkyl halide to form an alkene—one of the most common methods for alkene synthesis in the lab
- Typically proceeds through E2 when a strong base is used; bases like NaOEt in ethanol or t-BuOK in t-BuOH are standard conditions
- Follows Zaitsev's rule by default—unless a bulky base is specified, predict the more substituted alkene as the major product
Beta-Elimination (General)
- Defines the positional relationship—the β-carbon is adjacent to the carbon bearing the leaving group, and the β-hydrogen is the one removed
- Foundation for understanding all elimination mechanisms—whether E1, E2, or E1cB, the β-hydrogen and leaving group are always on adjacent carbons
- Multiple β-hydrogens create regiochemical choices—the number and position of β-hydrogens determine how many different alkene products are possible
Compare: Dehydration vs. Dehydrohalogenation—both make alkenes, but dehydration uses acid (E1 mechanism, rearrangements possible) while dehydrohalogenation typically uses base (E2 mechanism, stereospecific). Know which conditions favor which pathway.
Stereochemistry and Competing Pathways
Understanding geometric constraints and reaction competition separates students who memorize from those who truly understand elimination chemistry.
Stereochemistry in Elimination Reactions
- E2 requires anti-periplanar geometry—the C−H and C−LG bonds must be 180° apart, which often means only certain conformations are reactive
- E1 produces mixtures because the planar carbocation intermediate can lose a proton from either face, often giving both E and Z isomers
- Cyclohexane substrates are classic exam problems—only axial β-hydrogens are anti-periplanar to an axial leaving group, so you must draw chair conformations to predict products
Competing Substitution and Elimination Reactions
- Same substrate can undergo SN1, SN2, E1, or E2—your job is to predict which pathway dominates under given conditions
- Strong base + primary substrate → SN2 unless the base is also bulky, which shifts toward E2; tertiary substrates eliminate because SN2 is blocked by steric hindrance
- Heat favors elimination because ΔS is positive for elimination (two products from one reactant), making it entropically favorable at higher temperatures
Compare: SN2 vs. E2—both require strong nucleophile/base and follow second-order kinetics, but SN2 attacks carbon while E2 abstracts hydrogen. Bulky bases favor E2; small, good nucleophiles favor SN2. This distinction appears on virtually every organic chemistry exam.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Carbocation intermediate | E1, Dehydration of alcohols |
| Carbanion intermediate | E1cB |
| Concerted mechanism | E2 |
| Zaitsev regioselectivity | E1, E2 with small bases, Dehydration |
| Hofmann regioselectivity | E2 with bulky bases, Quaternary ammonium elimination |
| Anti-periplanar requirement | E2, Stereochemistry in cyclohexanes |
| Rearrangement possible | E1, Dehydration of alcohols |
| Competes with substitution | All elimination mechanisms |
Self-Check Questions
-
What key difference in mechanism explains why E1 reactions can lead to carbocation rearrangements while E2 reactions cannot?
-
You have a secondary alkyl bromide and need to maximize elimination over substitution. Would you choose NaOH or t-BuOK as your base, and why?
-
Compare and contrast the stereochemical outcomes of E1 and E2 reactions—why does E2 often give a single stereoisomer while E1 gives mixtures?
-
A student heats 2-butanol with concentrated H2SO4. Draw the major product and explain why this reaction follows Zaitsev's rule.
-
If an FRQ shows you a cyclohexane derivative with a leaving group and asks you to predict the E2 product, what conformational analysis must you perform before answering?