Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Chromatography isn't just about separating mixtures—it's about understanding how and why different molecules behave differently under controlled conditions. You're being tested on your ability to match separation mechanisms to molecular properties: volatility, polarity, size, charge, and specific binding interactions. These principles connect directly to broader concepts in thermodynamics, intermolecular forces, and molecular structure that appear throughout your coursework.
When you encounter chromatography on an exam, the question rarely asks you to simply name a technique. Instead, you'll need to explain why a particular method works for a given analyte, or which technique best suits a specific separation challenge. Don't just memorize the names—know what physical or chemical property each method exploits and when you'd choose one over another.
These methods separate compounds based on how they partition between a stationary phase and a mobile phase. The key principle: molecules with greater affinity for the stationary phase move more slowly, while those preferring the mobile phase elute faster.
Compare: TLC vs. Paper Chromatography—both are planar techniques using capillary action, but TLC offers better resolution and faster separations due to its uniform adsorbent layer. If asked which is better for quantitative work, TLC wins; paper chromatography is primarily qualitative.
These methods exploit differences in vapor pressure and boiling point. Compounds must be vaporizable without decomposition, making these techniques ideal for small, thermally stable molecules.
Compare: GC vs. SFC—both handle compounds that traditional liquid chromatography struggles with, but GC requires analytes to vaporize completely while SFC can separate thermally labile compounds. FRQ tip: if the question mentions "heat-sensitive but non-polar," think SFC.
High-pressure systems force mobile phase through tightly packed columns, dramatically improving resolution and speed compared to gravity-driven methods. The principle: smaller particles and higher pressure yield sharper separations.
Compare: GC vs. HPLC—GC excels for volatile, thermally stable compounds with fast analysis times, while HPLC handles everything else (large molecules, ionic species, heat-sensitive drugs). Know which molecular properties dictate your choice.
Separation here depends on electrostatic interactions between charged analytes and oppositely charged stationary phase materials. The mechanism involves competitive binding and displacement by buffer ions.
These methods separate molecules purely by hydrodynamic radius—no chemical interaction required. Porous materials act as molecular sieves, with smaller molecules taking longer, more tortuous paths.
Compare: SEC vs. Ion Exchange—both purify proteins, but SEC separates by size while ion exchange separates by charge. Choose SEC when you need native conditions and gentle handling; choose ion exchange for higher resolution based on surface charge differences.
These highly selective methods exploit specific molecular recognition events—lock-and-key binding between target molecules and immobilized ligands. Selectivity is unmatched, but the approach requires prior knowledge of binding partners.
Compare: Affinity vs. Chiral Chromatography—both rely on specific molecular recognition, but affinity chromatography targets a unique biomolecule while chiral chromatography distinguishes between enantiomers of the same compound. Both are indispensable in pharmaceutical development.
| Separation Principle | Best Techniques |
|---|---|
| Partitioning/Polarity | Column chromatography, TLC, Paper chromatography |
| Volatility/Vapor Pressure | GC, SFC |
| Molecular Size | Size exclusion chromatography |
| Ionic Charge | Ion exchange chromatography |
| Specific Binding | Affinity chromatography, Chiral chromatography |
| Non-volatile/Thermally Labile | HPLC, SFC |
| Enantiomer Resolution | Chiral HPLC, Chiral SFC |
| Rapid Qualitative Analysis | TLC, Paper chromatography |
Which two techniques would you choose to analyze a mixture containing both volatile organic compounds and thermally unstable peptides, and why can't a single method handle both?
A protein mixture contains species differing primarily in their isoelectric points. Which chromatography technique exploits this property, and what would you adjust to elute proteins selectively?
Compare and contrast size exclusion chromatography with ion exchange chromatography for protein purification—under what circumstances would you choose each?
You need to separate two enantiomers of a drug candidate. What type of stationary phase is required, and why do standard HPLC columns fail at this task?
An FRQ asks you to design a purification scheme for a His-tagged recombinant protein from bacterial lysate. Which technique offers the most selective first step, and what principle does it exploit?