Key Aspects of the Impeachment Process

Why This Matters

Impeachment represents one of the Constitution's most powerful checks on executive authority, and understanding it means grasping the delicate balance between separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism that defines American government. You're being tested not just on the mechanics of who votes when, but on why the Founders designed a process that's deliberately difficult—requiring both chambers of Congress to act, with different roles and different voting thresholds.

The impeachment process also reveals how political accountability differs from legal accountability in the American system. When you encounter FRQ prompts about congressional oversight, presidential power, or constitutional interpretation, impeachment is often your strongest example. Don't just memorize the vote counts—know what each step illustrates about the relationship between branches and why the Founders made removal so hard to achieve.

---

Constitutional Framework and Grounds

The Constitution doesn't leave impeachment to chance—it specifies exactly who can be removed, for what reasons, and through what process. This framework reflects the Founders' fear of tyranny balanced against their concern for governmental stability.

Constitutional Basis (Article II, Section 4)

• Article II, Section 4 establishes that the President, Vice President, and all civil officers can be removed through impeachment—not just elected officials
• Federal judges are included as "civil officers," which is why judicial impeachments have actually been more common than presidential ones
• The placement in Article II (the executive article) signals that this is primarily about checking presidential power, even though it applies more broadly

Impeachable Offenses

• "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors"—the deliberately vague final phrase gives Congress flexibility to define serious abuses of power
• Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution itself (Article III, Section 3), requiring either levying war against the U.S. or aiding enemies
• "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" doesn't require violation of criminal law—it encompasses breaches of public trust and abuses of official power that the Founders considered uniquely dangerous

---

The Two-Chamber Process

The Founders split impeachment between the House and Senate deliberately, ensuring that no single body could remove a president unilaterally. This division mirrors the British system where the House of Commons accused and the House of Lords tried—but with American modifications.

Role of the House of Representatives

• Sole power of impeachment means only the House can formally charge officials—this is the accusation phase, similar to a grand jury indictment
• Simple majority vote (218 of 435 members) is required to pass articles of impeachment, making it relatively achievable for a determined majority party
• The House acts as prosecutor, with designated "managers" presenting the case during the Senate trial

Role of the Senate in Trial

• The Senate conducts the actual trial, with senators serving as both judge and jury—a fundamentally different function than their normal legislative role
• Senators take a special oath to "do impartial justice," though partisan considerations inevitably influence voting
• The Senate establishes its own trial rules, which can vary significantly between impeachment proceedings

---

Voting Thresholds and Their Significance

The different voting requirements at each stage reveal the Founders' intent: make accusation possible but removal difficult. These thresholds are among the most frequently tested specifics of the impeachment process.

Two-Thirds Majority for Conviction

• 67 senators must vote to convict—this supermajority requirement has never been reached for a presidential impeachment in American history
• The high threshold prevents partisan removal, ensuring that only bipartisan consensus can remove a president from office
• Acquittal is the default outcome if 34 or more senators vote against conviction, which is why presidents have survived every Senate trial

Consequences of Conviction

• Immediate removal from office is automatic upon conviction—there is no appeal process or delay
• Disqualification from future office requires a separate Senate vote with only a simple majority, making it easier to achieve than conviction itself
• No criminal immunity—a convicted official can still face criminal prosecution in regular courts for the same conduct

---

Procedural Safeguards and Roles

The Constitution builds in specific procedural protections to ensure impeachment trials maintain legitimacy, particularly when the president is the one on trial.

Chief Justice's Presiding Role

• The Chief Justice presides only for presidential impeachments—for all other impeachments, the Vice President (as Senate president) or president pro tempore presides
• This prevents conflict of interest since the Vice President would directly benefit from a president's removal—a classic checks and balances consideration
• The Chief Justice generally does not vote and serves primarily to maintain order and rule on procedural questions

Differences from Criminal Trials

• Impeachment is explicitly political, not legal—the Constitution calls it a "trial" but the standard is fitness for office, not guilt beyond reasonable doubt
• No criminal penalties can result—the maximum consequence is removal and disqualification, not imprisonment or fines
• Double jeopardy doesn't apply—an acquitted official can still face criminal charges, and a convicted one has already faced them through impeachment

---

Continuity of Government

The Constitution anticipates successful removal and ensures the government continues functioning—a key aspect of stability within the constitutional system.

Presidential Succession After Removal

• The Vice President immediately becomes President (not "Acting President") upon a president's removal through impeachment
• The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 establishes the line beyond VP: Speaker of the House, President Pro Tempore, then Cabinet secretaries
• The 25th Amendment (1967) provides the mechanism for filling a vice presidential vacancy, ensuring the succession line remains intact

---

Historical Precedents

Every presidential impeachment has tested and clarified the constitutional framework, establishing precedents that shape how future Congresses approach the process.

Presidential Impeachment Cases

• Andrew Johnson (1868) was impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act; acquitted by one vote, establishing that policy disagreements alone may not justify removal
• Bill Clinton (1998) was impeached for perjury and obstruction related to personal conduct; acquittal reinforced questions about what constitutes "high crimes"
• Donald Trump (2019, 2021) became the only president impeached twice—first for abuse of power/obstruction, then for incitement of insurrection; both acquittals demonstrated the difficulty of achieving 67 votes

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Why did the Founders require a two-thirds Senate majority for conviction rather than a simple majority, and how has this threshold affected historical outcomes?

2. Compare the roles of the House and Senate in impeachment. Which chamber's function most resembles a grand jury, and which resembles a trial court?

3. If a president is impeached but acquitted, what consequences (if any) can they still face? How does this illustrate the difference between political and legal accountability?

4. Why does the Chief Justice preside over presidential impeachment trials but not other impeachment trials? What constitutional principle does this arrangement reflect?

5. All three impeached presidents were acquitted by the Senate. Based on the constitutional design, explain whether this outcome reflects a flaw in the system or the system working as intended.