Why This Matters
Photography critics don't just review images—they shape how entire generations understand what photographs mean and what they do to us. When you study these thinkers, you're learning the theoretical frameworks that define photography's place in art history, cultural studies, and visual communication. Their ideas about representation, authenticity, the gaze, and meaning-making appear constantly in exam questions about how photography functions as both art and social document.
Don't just memorize who wrote what book. Focus on understanding each critic's central argument and how their ideas connect to broader debates: Is photography art or document? Who controls visual narratives? How do images shape our understanding of reality? When you can explain why Barthes's "punctum" matters or how Sekula challenged documentary assumptions, you're thinking like an exam grader wants you to think.
Theorists of Meaning and Semiotics
These critics approached photography through philosophy and semiotics, asking fundamental questions about how images create meaning and affect viewers. Their frameworks give you the vocabulary to analyze any photograph's relationship to truth, emotion, and representation.
Roland Barthes
- "Camera Lucida" (1980)—his most influential work on photography, written as a meditation on his mother's death and the nature of photographic meaning
- Studium and punctum—studium refers to the cultural, political, or historical interest in a photograph; punctum is the personal, piercing detail that "wounds" the viewer emotionally
- Photography and death—argued that photographs are inherently tied to mortality, capturing a moment that has already passed ("that-has-been")
Susan Sontag
- "On Photography" (1977)—a collection of essays that became foundational for understanding photography's social and ethical dimensions
- Image saturation—critiqued how the flood of photographs numbs viewers and transforms experience into collectible images
- Ethics of looking—questioned whether photographing suffering exploits victims and whether viewing such images creates meaningful engagement or passive consumption
Compare: Barthes vs. Sontag—both examined photography's emotional and ethical weight, but Barthes focused on personal response (punctum) while Sontag emphasized collective social effects. If an FRQ asks about photography's impact on viewers, these two offer complementary angles.
Rosalind Krauss
- Postmodern theory—challenged traditional definitions of photography by examining it alongside painting, sculpture, and conceptual art
- Index and trace—applied semiotic theory to argue that photographs function as indexical signs, physically connected to their subjects like footprints or shadows
- "The Originality of the Avant-Garde"—her influential essays questioned assumptions about authenticity and originality in photographic practice
Institutional Shapers and Historians
These figures worked within museums and academia to establish photography's legitimacy as an art form. Their curatorial and scholarly work determined which photographers entered the canon and how the medium's history would be told.
Beaumont Newhall
- "The History of Photography" (1937)—one of the first comprehensive surveys of the medium, establishing the standard narrative of photographic development
- MoMA's first photography curator—his institutional role gave him enormous power to define which work counted as "art photography"
- Technical-aesthetic approach—emphasized formal qualities and technical innovation, creating a framework that later critics would challenge as too narrow
John Szarkowski
- MoMA director of photography (1962–1991)—arguably the most influential curator in photography history, shaping public understanding of the medium for three decades
- "The Photographer's Eye" (1966)—identified five formal characteristics (the thing itself, the detail, the frame, time, vantage point) that define photographic vision
- Elevated vernacular photography—championed work by Diane Arbus, Lee Friedlander, and Garry Winogrand, shifting attention from pictorialism to street photography
Compare: Newhall vs. Szarkowski—both shaped photography's institutional acceptance, but Newhall wrote the historical narrative while Szarkowski defined contemporary taste. Newhall emphasized technical progress; Szarkowski emphasized the photographer's unique way of seeing.
Social and Political Critics
These writers insisted that photography cannot be separated from power, politics, and social structures. They challenged "neutral" readings of images by exposing how photographs reinforce or resist dominant ideologies.
Allan Sekula
- Photography and labor—examined how images of workers and industry serve capitalist narratives, often erasing the realities of class and exploitation
- "Fish Story" (1995)—combined photographs and essays to critique global shipping and the invisibility of maritime labor
- Documentary skepticism—questioned the assumed truthfulness of documentary photography, arguing that all images are constructed and ideological
Abigail Solomon-Godeau
- Feminist critique—analyzed how photography historically represented women through the male gaze, objectifying female subjects for male viewers
- "Photography at the Dock" (1991)—collected essays examining photography's relationship to identity, power, and representation
- Institutional critique—questioned how museums and galleries shape which photographs are valued and whose perspectives are marginalized
Compare: Sekula vs. Solomon-Godeau—both approached photography through political critique, but Sekula focused on class and labor while Solomon-Godeau emphasized gender and representation. Together they demonstrate how critical theory exposes photography's role in maintaining social hierarchies.
Cultural Historians and Contextualizers
These critics situate photography within broader cultural narratives, examining how the medium reflects and shapes society over time.
Vicki Goldberg
- Cultural significance—wrote extensively on how photographs become iconic and shape collective memory of historical events
- "The Power of Photography" (1991)—explored how specific images influence public opinion and historical understanding
- Diverse voices—advocated for recognizing photographers outside the traditional (white, male, Western) canon
A.D. Coleman
- Critical journalism—one of the first dedicated photography critics writing for mainstream publications, bringing serious analysis to general audiences
- Expanded definitions—argued against rigid boundaries between "art" and "commercial" or "documentary" photography
- Technology and ethics—addressed digital manipulation and its implications for photographic truth long before it became a mainstream concern
Compare: Goldberg vs. Coleman—both wrote for broad audiences about photography's cultural role, but Goldberg emphasized historical impact while Coleman focused on contemporary practice and emerging technologies.
This critical approach treats the photobook as a distinct medium with its own aesthetic principles, separate from individual prints or gallery exhibitions.
Gerry Badger
- "The Photobook: A History" (co-authored with Martin Parr)—the definitive survey of photobooks as artistic objects, spanning over a century of production
- Sequencing and narrative—emphasized that photobooks create meaning through the arrangement of images, not just individual photographs
- Medium specificity—argued that the photobook offers possibilities unavailable in gallery exhibitions, including pacing, juxtaposition, and physical interaction
Quick Reference Table
|
| Semiotics and meaning | Barthes, Krauss |
| Ethics of viewing | Sontag, Sekula |
| Institutional canon-building | Newhall, Szarkowski |
| Feminist/political critique | Solomon-Godeau, Sekula |
| Cultural history | Goldberg, Coleman |
| Photobook theory | Badger |
| Postmodern theory | Krauss, Sekula |
| Documentary skepticism | Sekula, Sontag |
Self-Check Questions
-
Both Barthes and Sontag wrote about photography's emotional impact on viewers. How do their concepts of "punctum" and "image saturation" represent different approaches to understanding this impact?
-
Which two critics were most responsible for establishing photography's legitimacy within museum institutions, and how did their approaches differ?
-
If an FRQ asked you to analyze how photography reinforces social power structures, which critics would you cite and what specific concepts would you use?
-
Compare and contrast Sekula's critique of documentary photography with Szarkowski's celebration of "the photographer's eye." What fundamental disagreement about photography's nature does this reveal?
-
How did feminist critics like Solomon-Godeau challenge the frameworks established by earlier institutional figures like Newhall and Szarkowski?