Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Impressionism wasn't just a style—it was a full-scale rebellion against academic painting conventions that fundamentally changed how artists approach light, color, perception, and subject matter. When you're tested on this movement, you're being asked to understand how these techniques work together to capture optical experience rather than photographic reality. The AP exam loves asking you to identify these methods in unfamiliar works and explain why artists chose them.
Don't just memorize a list of techniques—know what problem each one solves. Whether it's capturing the shimmer of sunlight on water or conveying the energy of a crowded café, every Impressionist innovation serves a specific visual purpose. Understanding the mechanism behind each technique will help you nail both multiple-choice identifications and FRQ analysis questions.
The Impressionists were obsessed with one question: how do we paint light itself, not just objects in light? These techniques prioritize the fleeting, ever-changing qualities of natural illumination over static, studio-lit accuracy.
Compare: Emphasis on light vs. Plein air painting—both prioritize natural illumination, but emphasis on light is the goal while plein air is the method. If an FRQ asks how Impressionists achieved their distinctive light effects, plein air painting is your concrete answer.
Impressionists didn't just use color differently—they understood color scientifically. These techniques reflect emerging 19th-century research into optics and perception.
Compare: Broken color vs. Optical mixing—these are essentially the same phenomenon described from different angles. Broken color is the technique (how paint is applied); optical mixing is the perceptual result (what happens in the viewer's eye). Use broken color when discussing artist's method, optical mixing when discussing viewer experience.
The Impressionists made the act of painting visible. These techniques reject the smooth, polished surfaces of academic art in favor of expressive, tactile marks.
Compare: Loose brushstrokes vs. Impasto—both make the painting process visible, but loose brushwork emphasizes gesture and speed while impasto emphasizes material presence and texture. Van Gogh pushed impasto to extremes; Monet's water lilies show loose brushwork without heavy impasto.
These techniques represent conscious rejection of conventions taught at official art academies. Understanding what Impressionists rejected helps explain why their choices were revolutionary.
Compare: Rejection of perspective vs. Focus on everyday subjects—both challenge academic conventions, but one attacks formal rules (how to construct space) while the other attacks content hierarchies (what's worth painting). Together, they represent a complete break from Salon expectations.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Light and atmosphere | Emphasis on light, Capturing fleeting moments, Plein air painting |
| Color innovation | Broken color, Pure unmixed colors, Optical mixing |
| Surface and brushwork | Loose visible brushstrokes, Impasto technique |
| Anti-academic rebellion | Rejection of linear perspective, Focus on everyday subjects |
| Viewer engagement | Optical mixing, Broken color |
| Technical method | Plein air painting, Impasto, Broken color |
| Modern subject matter | Focus on everyday subjects, Capturing fleeting moments |
| Perceptual emphasis | Emphasis on light, Optical mixing, Rejection of perspective |
Which two techniques both rely on the viewer's eye to complete the visual effect, and how do they differ in application?
If shown an Impressionist painting with thick, textured surfaces and visible individual brushmarks, which two techniques would you identify, and what distinguishes them?
Compare and contrast plein air painting with the emphasis on light—how does the method enable the goal?
An FRQ asks you to explain how Impressionists challenged academic conventions. Which techniques would you discuss, and what specific rules did each one break?
Why did the invention of portable paint tubes matter for Impressionist technique, and which specific methods became possible as a result?