Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In graphic design, choosing the wrong file format can tank your entire project—a pixelated logo on a billboard, a 50MB image crashing a website, or a flattened file that can't be edited. You're being tested on understanding the technical differences between formats and, more importantly, when to use each one. This means knowing concepts like lossy vs. lossless compression, raster vs. vector graphics, and color depth limitations.
Don't just memorize that PNG supports transparency—understand why that makes it the right choice for a logo overlay and the wrong choice for a photo gallery. The formats below are grouped by their primary function and underlying technology, so you can see the patterns that will help you make smart decisions in real design scenarios and answer exam questions with confidence.
These formats use a grid of pixels to represent images, making them ideal for photographs and complex imagery with smooth color gradients. The key tradeoff is always between file size and image quality.
Compare: JPEG vs. TIFF—both handle photographs well, but JPEG sacrifices quality for smaller files while TIFF preserves everything for print production. If asked about preparing images for a commercial printer, TIFF is your answer.
These formats prioritize web performance and special features like transparency and animation. Understanding color limitations and compression types is essential here.
Compare: PNG vs. GIF—both use lossless compression, but PNG supports millions of colors and smooth transparency while GIF is limited to 256 colors with binary transparency. Choose GIF only when you need animation; otherwise, PNG wins.
Vector formats use mathematical paths rather than pixels, allowing infinite scaling without quality loss. This makes them essential for logos, icons, and any graphic that needs to work at multiple sizes.
Compare: SVG vs. EPS—both are vector formats, but SVG is optimized for web use with code-based editing while EPS is the traditional choice for print production. For a responsive website icon, use SVG; for sending a logo to a print shop, use EPS.
These formats prioritize editability and cross-platform compatibility, serving as either working documents or final deliverables depending on the context.
Compare: PSD vs. AI—both are Adobe working files, but PSD is raster-based (pixels) while AI is vector-based (paths). Choose PSD for photo manipulation and compositing; choose AI for logos and illustrations that need to scale.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Lossy compression | JPEG |
| Lossless compression | PNG, GIF, TIFF |
| Transparency support | PNG, GIF, SVG |
| Vector scalability | SVG, EPS, AI, PDF |
| Animation capability | GIF, SVG |
| Print production | TIFF, EPS, PDF |
| Photo editing flexibility | RAW, PSD, TIFF |
| Web optimization | JPEG, PNG, GIF, SVG |
Which two formats both support transparency but differ significantly in color depth capability? What makes one better for photographs and the other better for simple graphics?
A client needs a logo that will appear on business cards, billboards, and their website. Which format category should you work in, and which specific formats would you deliver for print vs. web?
Compare and contrast JPEG and PNG: What type of compression does each use, and how does this affect your choice when exporting a photograph versus a logo with text?
You're preparing images for a high-end magazine print job. Rank JPEG, TIFF, and PNG in order of preference and explain the reasoning behind your top choice.
A designer sends you a PSD file and an AI file for the same project. Without opening them, what can you infer about the type of content in each file and how they were likely created?