Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In supply chain management, you're being tested on your ability to identify, analyze, and mitigate risks that threaten operational continuity. Global supply chains don't fail randomly—they fail because of predictable vulnerability patterns: external shocks, systemic dependencies, regulatory friction, and coordination failures. Understanding these patterns means you can anticipate disruptions before they cascade into full-blown crises.
The challenges covered here represent the core risk categories that appear repeatedly on exams and in real-world case studies. Don't just memorize what each challenge is—know which mitigation strategies apply, how challenges interact with each other, and why some companies survive disruptions while others collapse. That's the thinking that earns top marks on FRQs.
These challenges originate outside the supply chain itself but create immediate, often severe disruptions. The key principle: external shocks test whether your supply chain has built-in redundancy and response protocols.
Compare: Natural disasters vs. pandemics—both are external shocks, but natural disasters typically affect specific geographic nodes while pandemics create system-wide workforce constraints. If an FRQ asks about building resilience, natural disasters call for geographic diversification; pandemics call for workforce flexibility and demand sensing.
These challenges stem from macroeconomic instability and affect cost structures, pricing power, and profitability. The underlying principle: global operations multiply currency and economic exposures that domestic supply chains don't face.
Compare: Currency risk vs. transportation cost spikes—both hit the bottom line, but currency risk is hedgeable through financial instruments while transportation disruptions require operational flexibility like alternative routes and modes. Strong answers address both financial and operational mitigation.
These challenges arise from the inherent complexity of global operations—technology dependencies, information security, and coordination across borders. The principle: the same connectivity that enables global supply chains also creates attack surfaces and failure points.
Compare: Cybersecurity threats vs. inventory visibility gaps—both are information problems, but cybersecurity is about protecting data integrity while inventory management is about generating actionable data. Companies often underinvest in both because the costs are hidden until failure occurs.
These challenges emerge from operating across multiple legal jurisdictions with different rules, standards, and enforcement mechanisms. The principle: regulatory complexity scales faster than geographic footprint—each new market multiplies compliance requirements.
Compare: Traditional regulatory compliance vs. sustainability requirements—traditional compliance focuses on product and process standards while sustainability compliance increasingly requires full supply chain visibility. FRQs may ask how companies balance cost pressures against transparency demands.
These challenges involve the human and organizational dimensions of global supply chains—communication, trust, and alignment across cultural boundaries. The principle: supply chain performance ultimately depends on relationship quality, not just contract terms.
Compare: Cultural barriers vs. cybersecurity threats—both create information distortion, but cultural barriers cause unintentional miscommunication while cyber threats involve deliberate manipulation. Mitigation strategies differ: relationship building vs. technical controls.
| Risk Category | Key Challenges | Primary Mitigation Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| External Shocks | Natural disasters, pandemics, geopolitical tensions | Geographic diversification, contingency planning, crisis response protocols |
| Financial/Economic | Currency volatility, transportation costs | Hedging instruments, multi-modal logistics, supplier financial monitoring |
| Systemic Vulnerability | Cybersecurity, inventory visibility | Security architecture, demand sensing technology, real-time tracking |
| Regulatory/Compliance | Multi-jurisdiction rules, sustainability mandates | Compliance monitoring systems, traceability programs, third-party audits |
| Coordination/Relationships | Cultural barriers, communication gaps | Local expertise, relationship investment, cultural training |
| Capacity Constraints | Port congestion, carrier limits | Route diversification, carrier relationships, safety stock positioning |
| Demand Volatility | Pandemic swings, economic instability | Agile capacity planning, demand sensing, flexible contracts |
Which two challenges both create information problems but require fundamentally different mitigation approaches—one technical, one relational?
If a company sources 80% of a critical component from a single country experiencing political instability, which risk category is most relevant, and what specific strategy should they prioritize?
Compare and contrast how natural disasters and global pandemics affect supply chain operations differently. Why does this distinction matter for resilience planning?
A company faces simultaneous currency depreciation in a supplier country and port congestion delaying shipments. Which challenge is addressable through financial instruments, and which requires operational changes?
An FRQ asks you to recommend how a company should respond to increasing sustainability disclosure requirements. Which challenges from this guide would you connect, and what trade-offs should your answer acknowledge?