upgrade
upgrade

📐Mathematical Physics

Fundamental Mathematical Physics Equations

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Mathematical physics isn't about memorizing equations—it's about understanding the deep structures that govern physical reality. These ten equations represent humanity's most successful attempts to describe everything from the motion of a baseball to the behavior of electrons in atoms to the curvature of spacetime itself. You're being tested on your ability to recognize which mathematical framework applies to which physical situation, how these equations connect across domains, and why certain formulations (Lagrangian vs. Newtonian, for instance) offer advantages in different contexts.

The real power here lies in seeing the unifying themes: differential equations as the language of change, variational principles as nature's optimization strategy, and the bridge between microscopic and macroscopic descriptions. Don't just memorize the symbols—know what physical principle each equation encodes, what assumptions it requires, and where it breaks down. That conceptual understanding is what separates strong exam performance from rote recall.


Classical Mechanics Foundations

These equations describe motion and forces in the everyday world. Classical mechanics assumes objects have definite positions and momenta, and that measurements don't disturb the system.

Newton's Second Law of Motion

  • F=ma\vec{F} = m\vec{a}—the net force on an object equals its mass times acceleration, establishing the foundation of dynamics
  • Linearity and superposition allow forces to be added vectorially, making complex problems tractable through decomposition
  • Limitations emerge at relativistic speeds (where mass appears to increase) and quantum scales (where trajectories become undefined)

Euler-Lagrange Equation

  • ddtLq˙Lq=0\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} = 0—derives equations of motion by extremizing the action functional S=LdtS = \int L \, dt
  • Coordinate independence makes this formulation powerful for systems with constraints, where Newtonian methods become cumbersome
  • Generalizes to field theory by replacing discrete coordinates with continuous fields, bridging classical mechanics and modern physics

Compare: Newton's Second Law vs. Euler-Lagrange—both yield identical equations of motion for classical systems, but Euler-Lagrange handles constraints naturally and generalizes to relativity and quantum field theory. If asked about the most general formulation of mechanics, Lagrangian methods are your answer.


Electromagnetic Theory

Maxwell's equations unified what were once separate phenomena into a single elegant framework. The key insight: changing electric fields create magnetic fields, and vice versa.

Maxwell's Equations

  • Four coupled equations (Gauss's law, Gauss's law for magnetism, Faraday's law, Ampère-Maxwell law) completely describe classical electromagnetism
  • Predict electromagnetic waves traveling at speed c=1μ0ϵ0c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}}, revealing that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon
  • Lorentz invariance built into these equations foreshadowed special relativity and showed Newtonian mechanics was incomplete

Wave Equation

  • 2ψ=1v22ψt2\nabla^2 \psi = \frac{1}{v^2}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial t^2}—describes propagation of disturbances through media at speed vv
  • Applies universally to sound waves, electromagnetic waves, vibrating strings, and quantum probability amplitudes
  • Solutions include traveling waves, standing waves, and superpositions, with boundary conditions determining allowed modes

Compare: Maxwell's Equations vs. Wave Equation—Maxwell's equations imply the wave equation for electromagnetic fields in vacuum, but the wave equation is more general, applying to any linear wave phenomenon. Know that Maxwell is the source of electromagnetic wave behavior.


Quantum Mechanics

These equations govern the subatomic world, where particles exhibit wave-like behavior and measurements fundamentally disturb systems. The wave function ψ\psi encodes probability amplitudes, not definite outcomes.

Schrödinger Equation

  • iψt=H^ψi\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H}\psi—describes time evolution of quantum states, with H^\hat{H} as the Hamiltonian operator
  • Wave function ψ\psi contains complete information about the system; ψ2|\psi|^2 gives probability density for measurements
  • Non-relativistic limitation means this equation fails for particles moving near light speed, requiring the Dirac equation instead

Dirac Equation

  • (iγμμm)ψ=0(i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m)\psi = 0—combines quantum mechanics with special relativity for spin-12\frac{1}{2} particles
  • Predicts antimatter as negative-energy solutions, confirmed experimentally with the discovery of the positron
  • Explains spin naturally as a consequence of relativistic invariance, not an ad hoc addition

Compare: Schrödinger vs. Dirac—Schrödinger works beautifully for low-energy quantum systems (atoms, molecules), while Dirac is essential for high-energy physics and explains phenomena like spin and antimatter that Schrödinger cannot. FRQs about relativistic quantum mechanics require Dirac.


Spacetime and Gravity

Einstein's revolutionary insight: gravity isn't a force but a manifestation of curved spacetime geometry.

Einstein's Field Equations

  • Gμν=8πGc4TμνG_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{\mu\nu}—relates spacetime curvature (left side) to matter-energy distribution (right side)
  • Predicts gravitational waves, black holes, and the expansion of the universe—all confirmed observationally
  • Reduces to Newtonian gravity in the weak-field, slow-motion limit, ensuring consistency with classical results

Compare: Newton's Gravity vs. Einstein's Field Equations—Newton describes gravity as instantaneous action at a distance; Einstein describes it as local spacetime curvature propagating at speed cc. For most terrestrial applications, Newton suffices, but GPS satellites require relativistic corrections.


Continuum and Transport Phenomena

These equations describe how quantities flow and diffuse through continuous media. The mathematical structure—partial differential equations with spatial and temporal derivatives—is shared across seemingly different physical contexts.

Heat Equation

  • ut=α2u\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \alpha \nabla^2 u—describes diffusion of temperature (or any diffusing quantity) with thermal diffusivity α\alpha
  • Parabolic PDE structure means information propagates infinitely fast mathematically, though physical effects decay exponentially with distance
  • Same mathematical form governs chemical diffusion, probability diffusion in random walks, and financial option pricing
  • ρ(vt+vv)=p+μ2v+f\rho\left(\frac{\partial \vec{v}}{\partial t} + \vec{v} \cdot \nabla \vec{v}\right) = -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \vec{v} + \vec{f}—describes viscous fluid motion with density ρ\rho and viscosity μ\mu
  • Nonlinearity (the vv\vec{v} \cdot \nabla \vec{v} term) creates turbulence and makes general solutions extraordinarily difficult
  • Millennium Prize Problem: proving whether smooth solutions always exist remains one of mathematics' greatest unsolved challenges

Compare: Heat Equation vs. Navier-Stokes—both describe transport phenomena, but the heat equation is linear (solutions can be superposed) while Navier-Stokes is nonlinear (small changes can produce chaotic results). This distinction explains why weather prediction is fundamentally harder than heat conduction problems.


Statistical Mechanics

These equations bridge the microscopic world of particles to the macroscopic world of thermodynamics. The key insight: macroscopic properties emerge statistically from vast numbers of microscopic interactions.

Boltzmann Equation

  • ft+vf+Fmvf=(ft)coll\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \vec{v} \cdot \nabla f + \frac{\vec{F}}{m} \cdot \nabla_v f = \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_{\text{coll}}—describes evolution of particle distribution function f(r,v,t)f(\vec{r}, \vec{v}, t)
  • Bridges scales by connecting microscopic particle dynamics to macroscopic quantities like temperature, pressure, and viscosity
  • H-theorem derived from this equation provides a statistical foundation for the second law of thermodynamics

Compare: Boltzmann Equation vs. Navier-Stokes—Boltzmann operates at the kinetic (particle distribution) level, while Navier-Stokes operates at the continuum level. You can derive Navier-Stokes from Boltzmann by taking appropriate moments, showing the hierarchy of physical descriptions.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Classical dynamicsNewton's Second Law, Euler-Lagrange Equation
Electromagnetic phenomenaMaxwell's Equations, Wave Equation
Non-relativistic quantum mechanicsSchrödinger Equation
Relativistic quantum mechanicsDirac Equation
Gravity and spacetimeEinstein's Field Equations
Diffusion and heat transferHeat Equation, Boltzmann Equation
Fluid dynamicsNavier-Stokes Equations
Variational principlesEuler-Lagrange Equation
Statistical mechanicsBoltzmann Equation

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two equations can both be used to derive the same classical equations of motion, and what advantage does one have over the other for constrained systems?

  2. The Schrödinger equation fails under what physical conditions, and which equation from this list addresses that limitation?

  3. Compare and contrast the Heat Equation and Navier-Stokes Equations in terms of their mathematical structure (linear vs. nonlinear) and the physical consequences of that difference.

  4. How does the Boltzmann Equation relate to the Navier-Stokes Equations in terms of the scale of description, and what mathematical procedure connects them?

  5. If an FRQ asks you to explain why Maxwell's Equations implied the need for special relativity before Einstein developed it, which property of these equations would you cite?