Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Lean Startup methodology isn't just a trendy framework—it's the operating system that powers how modern incubators and accelerators evaluate, mentor, and invest in early-stage companies. You're being tested on your ability to understand how startups systematically reduce uncertainty through experimentation rather than guesswork. The principles here connect directly to concepts like product-market fit, resource efficiency, iterative development, and evidence-based decision-making.
These principles work together as an integrated system, not isolated tactics. When you encounter case studies or scenario questions, you'll need to identify which principle applies and why. Don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each principle solves and when a startup should deploy it. The difference between a struggling founder and a successful one often comes down to applying the right principle at the right moment.
At the heart of Lean Startup is a fundamental belief: startups exist to learn what customers actually want, not to execute a predetermined plan. These principles establish the basic mechanism for converting uncertainty into knowledge.
Compare: MVP vs. Validated Learning—an MVP is the vehicle for learning, while validated learning is the outcome. You can build an MVP and still fail to learn if you don't define what success looks like beforehand. FRQ tip: if asked about reducing startup risk, explain how these two work together.
Once you're generating learning, you need frameworks for acting on it. These principles guide the high-stakes choices that determine whether a startup survives or fails.
Compare: Pivot or Persevere vs. Innovation Accounting—Innovation Accounting provides the evidence, while Pivot or Persevere is the decision framework that uses it. A startup without innovation accounting makes pivot decisions based on emotion rather than data.
Lean Startup rejects the assumption that founders know what customers want. These principles ensure the customer's voice drives product evolution.
Compare: Customer Development vs. Continuous Deployment—Customer Development is about learning what to build through conversation, while Continuous Deployment is about learning from what you built through behavior. Both generate learning, but at different stages of the hypothesis cycle.
Not all data is created equal. These principles help startups distinguish between metrics that drive decisions and metrics that just feel good.
Compare: Actionable Metrics vs. Split Testing—Actionable metrics tell you what to measure, while split testing tells you how to measure it rigorously. You need both: the right metrics measured the wrong way still lead to bad decisions.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Learning mechanisms | Build-Measure-Learn, Validated Learning, Five Whys |
| Risk reduction tools | MVP, Split Testing, Customer Development |
| Decision frameworks | Pivot or Persevere, Innovation Accounting |
| Measurement approaches | Actionable Metrics, Innovation Accounting, Split Testing |
| Speed enablers | Continuous Deployment, MVP, Build-Measure-Learn |
| Customer focus | Customer Development, Validated Learning, Actionable Metrics |
| Problem-solving | Five Whys, Pivot or Persevere |
A startup has been building features for six months and has 50,000 registered users but minimal engagement. Which two principles would help them diagnose and address this problem?
Explain how the Build-Measure-Learn loop and Innovation Accounting work together. What happens if a startup uses one without the other?
Compare and contrast an MVP and a prototype. Why might a polished prototype actually be worse than a rough MVP for early-stage learning?
A founder says, "Our monthly active users increased 20% last month." Using the concept of actionable metrics, explain why this might be misleading and what questions you'd ask to get better data.
FRQ-style prompt: A food delivery startup has validated that customers want faster delivery but can't achieve it profitably in their current market. Using the Pivot or Persevere framework, describe three different types of pivots they might consider and what validated learning they'd need before choosing one.