Fundamental Knot Types

Why This Matters

Knot theory isn't just about tying ropes—it's a branch of topology that studies how loops can be embedded in three-dimensional space without cutting or gluing. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish knots by their invariants (crossing number, chirality, prime vs. composite structure) and understand how these properties reveal deeper mathematical truths about equivalence, symmetry, and classification. These concepts connect directly to applications in DNA topology, molecular chemistry, and even quantum computing.

When you encounter knot problems, the exam wants you to think beyond "what does it look like" to "what makes it mathematically distinct." Can two knots be deformed into each other? What's the minimum number of crossings? Is it chiral or amphichiral? Don't just memorize names—know what topological property each knot demonstrates and why that matters for classification.

---

Prime Knots: The Building Blocks

Prime knots cannot be decomposed into simpler knots, making them the "atoms" of knot theory. Just as prime numbers can't be factored, prime knots can't be expressed as connected sums of other nontrivial knots.

Unknot (Trivial Knot)

• Crossing number of zero—the only knot that can be laid flat as a simple circle with no self-intersections
• Identity element in knot composition; connecting any knot with an unknot yields the original knot unchanged
• Fundamental baseline for knot equivalence—proving a tangled loop is actually an unknot is computationally difficult and connects to major open problems

Trefoil Knot

• Simplest nontrivial knot with crossing number $3$—cannot be unknotted without cutting
• Chiral knot existing in distinct left-handed and right-handed forms that are mirror images but not equivalent
• Prime knot commonly used to demonstrate knot invariants like the Jones polynomial, where left and right trefoils yield different values

Figure-Eight Knot

• Crossing number of $4$—the only prime knot with exactly four crossings
• Amphichiral (achiral) meaning it is equivalent to its own mirror image, unlike the trefoil
• Hyperbolic knot whose complement admits a complete hyperbolic structure, making it central to geometric topology

Cinquefoil Knot

• Crossing number of $5$—also called the $5_1$ knot or Solomon's seal knot
• Torus knot of type $(5,2)$, meaning it can be drawn on the surface of a torus without self-intersection
• Chiral prime knot that demonstrates how crossing number alone doesn't determine chirality—compare to the amphichiral $4_1$

Three-Twist Knot

• Crossing number of $5$—designated $5_2$ in knot tables, distinct from the cinquefoil
• Twist knot formed by twisting a loop multiple times then connecting ends, illustrating a systematic knot family
• Non-torus knot that cannot be embedded on a torus surface, contrasting with the cinquefoil's torus structure

---

Practical Knots: Real-World Applications

These knots appear frequently in applied contexts—sailing, climbing, rescue operations—where security, ease of tying, and behavior under load matter as much as mathematical properties.

Stevedore Knot

• Crossing number of $6$—designated $6_1$ in standard knot tables
• Stopper knot in practical use, preventing rope from slipping through a hole or device
• Twist knot family member, formed by additional twists compared to the figure-eight, demonstrating systematic knot construction

Bowline Knot

• Fixed loop knot that maintains its shape under load and releases easily afterward
• Non-jamming property makes it essential in sailing and rescue—the loop won't tighten around a person or object
• Topologically equivalent to unknot when the working end is freed, illustrating how practical knot security differs from mathematical classification

---

Composite and Binding Knots: Structure Through Combination

Some knots are formed by combining simpler elements or binding multiple strands. Understanding their structure reveals how knot composition and symmetry affect both mathematical properties and practical reliability.

Square Knot (Reef Knot)

• Composite knot formed as the connected sum of a trefoil and its mirror image—mathematically, it's two trefoils combined
• Symmetric binding structure where both crossings follow the same over-under pattern on each side
• Orientation-dependent security—works only when both ends on each side are pulled together; capsizes under uneven load

Granny Knot

• Composite knot formed from two trefoils of the same chirality (both left-handed or both right-handed)
• Asymmetric and unstable—tends to slip or jam unpredictably under tension
• Cautionary example demonstrating how chirality affects practical knot behavior; mathematically distinct from square knot despite similar appearance

Overhand Knot

• Simplest stopper knot with crossing number $3$—topologically equivalent to the trefoil knot
• Building block for more complex knots; many practical knots begin with an overhand as their foundation
• Jamming tendency under load makes it difficult to untie, illustrating the trade-off between simplicity and practicality

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two five-crossing knots demonstrate the difference between torus and non-torus knots, and what distinguishes them geometrically?

2. Compare the trefoil and figure-eight knots in terms of chirality. How would you use a knot invariant like the Jones polynomial to prove they have different chiral properties?

3. Both the square knot and granny knot are composite knots made from trefoils. What determines whether the resulting knot is stable or prone to slipping?

4. The bowline is highly valued in practical applications, yet it's topologically equivalent to which fundamental knot? What does this reveal about the relationship between mathematical classification and real-world utility?

5. FRQ-style: Given a knot with crossing number 5, explain what additional invariants you would need to determine whether it's the cinquefoil ($5_1$) or three-twist knot ($5_2$). Discuss at least two properties beyond crossing number.