Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
CNC machining is the backbone of mechanical prototyping—it's how you transform raw stock into functional parts with the precision that 3D printing often can't match. You're being tested on more than just knowing that milling uses a spinning cutter; you need to understand which process to choose for a given geometry, why certain operations must precede others, and how material removal mechanics differ between rotating workpieces and rotating tools.
These processes connect directly to core prototyping principles: design for manufacturability, tolerance stackup, surface finish requirements, and process planning. When you're designing a part, you need to know whether that feature requires turning or milling, whether you'll need a secondary boring operation for precision, and how tool access affects your geometry choices. Don't just memorize what each process does—know what problems each one solves and when to reach for it.
These are your workhorses—the fundamental operations that remove the bulk of material and define your part's basic geometry. The key distinction here is what rotates: the tool or the workpiece.
Compare: Milling vs. Turning—both remove material with relative rotation between tool and workpiece, but milling handles prismatic/complex geometry while turning excels at cylindrical parts. If an FRQ asks you to select a process for a given part geometry, this distinction is your starting point.
Drilling gets you a hole, but these secondary operations give you the precision and quality that functional assemblies demand. The principle: roughing operations prioritize material removal rate, while finishing operations prioritize accuracy.
Compare: Drilling vs. Boring—drilling creates holes quickly but with limited accuracy ( typical); boring refines those holes to tight tolerances. Always drill undersized, then bore to final dimension for precision fits.
These processes create the reference surfaces and mating faces that determine how your parts fit together. Surface flatness and perpendicularity are often more critical than dimensional accuracy.
Compare: Facing vs. Contouring—facing produces flat reference surfaces with simple linear moves; contouring generates complex curves requiring coordinated multi-axis interpolation. Both are surface operations, but facing is about function (datum creation) while contouring is about form (shape generation).
These processes create specific functional features within your part. The key concept: features are defined by their function in the assembly, not just their geometry.
Compare: Pocketing vs. Engraving—both create recessed features, but pocketing removes significant material volume for functional purposes while engraving creates shallow surface marks for identification. Pocketing affects part strength; engraving typically doesn't.
Efficient CNC operation isn't just about cutting—it's about minimizing non-cutting time and maintaining consistency across operations.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Rotating tool, stationary work | Milling, Drilling, Boring |
| Rotating work, stationary tool | Turning, Facing (on lathe), Threading (on lathe) |
| Hole creation & refinement | Drilling, Boring, Threading |
| Surface generation | Facing, Contouring |
| Feature creation | Pocketing, Engraving |
| Precision finishing | Boring, Contouring, Facing |
| Process efficiency | Tool Changing, Pocketing (roughing/finishing strategy) |
You need a hole with diameter tolerance for a press-fit bearing. Which two processes would you sequence, and why can't drilling alone achieve this?
Compare milling and turning: what fundamental kinematic difference determines which process you'd choose for a given part geometry?
A part requires both a precision bore and internal threads in the same hole. In what order must these operations occur, and what happens if you reverse them?
Which processes would you use to create a flat datum surface on (a) a cylindrical shaft and (b) a rectangular block? Why does the workpiece geometry dictate the process?
An FRQ describes a part with weight-reduction pockets and identification text. Explain why these features require different tooling strategies despite both being "material removal from a surface."