Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Foreign Direct Investment sits at the heart of multinational corporate strategy. It's how companies actually commit capital across borders rather than just exporting goods or licensing technology. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish why a firm chooses one FDI approach over another, which means understanding the strategic logic behind each type: Is the company seeking markets, resources, efficiency, or strategic assets? Is it building from scratch or acquiring what already exists?
These FDI types connect directly to core course concepts like entry mode selection, ownership advantages, location decisions, and internalization theory. When you see an FRQ asking why a tech firm acquired a foreign startup versus building its own facility, you need to recognize the underlying motivations and trade-offs. Don't just memorize definitions. Know what strategic problem each FDI type solves and when a multinational would choose one over another.
The most fundamental FDI choice is whether to create something new or acquire something that already exists. This decision hinges on speed-to-market, control preferences, and available capital.
A greenfield investment means building a brand-new operation from the ground up in a foreign country. The firm designs its own facilities, hires its own staff, and establishes its own organizational culture without inheriting anyone else's problems.
Brownfield investment involves purchasing or leasing an existing facility and then upgrading or repurposing it. You're not starting from zero, but you're not buying a going concern with its full workforce and customer base either.
M&A means buying an existing foreign company outright (acquisition) or combining with it (merger). Unlike brownfield, you're acquiring the entire business: its people, customers, brand, and operations.
Compare: Greenfield vs. M&A: both provide full ownership, but greenfield offers control without integration headaches while M&A delivers speed without construction delays. If an FRQ asks about entering a market where time-to-market is critical, M&A is usually your answer; if it emphasizes brand consistency or operational excellence, lean toward greenfield.
FDI motivations explain the purpose behind the investment. Dunning's OLI framework (Ownership, Location, Internalization advantages) and the Four Motives model (market-seeking, resource-seeking, efficiency-seeking, strategic asset-seeking) show up repeatedly on exams. You should be able to identify which motive is driving a firm's decision in any scenario.
The goal here is to sell to customers in the host country. Firms pursue this when exporting becomes impractical or disadvantageous.
This motive is about acquiring capabilities that don't exist at home or can't be bought through normal market transactions.
With export-platform FDI, the firm doesn't primarily care about the host country's consumers. Instead, it uses the host country as a production base to serve customers in other markets.
Compare: Market-Seeking vs. Export-Platform FDI: both involve foreign production facilities, but market-seeking targets the host country's customers while export-platform uses the host country as a manufacturing base for third markets. This distinction is critical for understanding location decisions. A firm doing market-seeking FDI picks a country with large domestic demand; a firm doing export-platform FDI picks a country with low costs and favorable trade agreements.
These categories describe where in the industry value chain the investment occurs. They connect directly to concepts of scope economies, supply chain control, and transaction cost economics.
Horizontal FDI means replicating what you already do at home in a foreign market. You're expanding geographically within your core business.
Vertical FDI means investing at a different stage of your supply chain. It comes in two directions:
Compare: Horizontal vs. Vertical FDI: horizontal expands the firm's geographic footprint within its core business, while vertical deepens control over inputs or outputs. A semiconductor company building a chip factory abroad is horizontal; that same company acquiring a foreign rare earth mining operation is backward vertical FDI.
Some FDI types prioritize spreading risk across markets, industries, or partners rather than maximizing control or efficiency.
Conglomerate FDI involves investing in foreign businesses outside the firm's core industry. It's the international version of unrelated diversification.
A joint venture is a shared ownership structure where two or more firms create a new entity, pooling resources and splitting profits according to their agreement.
Compare: Conglomerate FDI vs. Joint Ventures: both reduce risk, but through different mechanisms. Conglomerate FDI diversifies across industries while maintaining full ownership control; joint ventures share risk with partners while typically staying in the firm's familiar industry. Joint ventures also provide local knowledge that conglomerate investments typically lack.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Full control entry modes | Greenfield, M&A |
| Speed-to-market priority | Brownfield, M&A |
| Market access motivation | Market-Seeking FDI, Horizontal FDI |
| Cost/efficiency motivation | Export-Platform FDI, Vertical FDI |
| Strategic capability building | Strategic Asset-Seeking FDI |
| Risk mitigation approaches | Conglomerate FDI, Joint Ventures |
| Supply chain control | Vertical FDI (backward and forward) |
| Partnership-based entry | Joint Ventures |
A European automaker wants to enter the Indian market quickly to capture growing middle-class demand but lacks local supplier relationships. Which two FDI types should it consider, and what trade-offs does each involve?
Compare and contrast greenfield investment and brownfield investment in terms of control, speed, and risk. Under what circumstances would a firm choose each?
A pharmaceutical company acquires a biotech startup in another country primarily for its patent portfolio and research team. Which FDI motivation does this represent, and how does it differ from market-seeking FDI?
Explain how export-platform FDI and market-seeking FDI might lead a firm to choose different host country locations, even within the same region.
If an FRQ describes a firm entering a foreign market where regulations require local ownership participation, which FDI type is most appropriate, and what strategic considerations should the firm address in structuring the arrangement?