Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Foreign Direct Investment sits at the heart of multinational corporate strategy—it's how companies actually commit capital across borders rather than just exporting goods or licensing technology. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish why a firm chooses one FDI approach over another, which means understanding the strategic logic behind each type: Is the company seeking markets, resources, efficiency, or strategic assets? Is it building from scratch or acquiring what already exists?
These FDI types connect directly to core course concepts like entry mode selection, ownership advantages, location decisions, and internalization theory. When you see an FRQ asking why a tech firm acquired a foreign startup versus building its own facility, you need to recognize the underlying motivations and trade-offs. Don't just memorize definitions—know what strategic problem each FDI type solves and when a multinational would choose one over another.
The most fundamental FDI choice is whether to create something new or acquire something that already exists. This decision hinges on speed-to-market, control preferences, and available capital.
Compare: Greenfield vs. M&A—both provide full ownership, but Greenfield offers control without integration headaches while M&A delivers speed without construction delays. If an FRQ asks about entering a market where time-to-market is critical, M&A is usually your answer; if it emphasizes brand consistency or operational excellence, lean toward Greenfield.
FDI motivations explain the purpose behind the investment. Dunning's OLI framework and the Four Motives model (market-seeking, resource-seeking, efficiency-seeking, strategic asset-seeking) show up repeatedly on exams.
Compare: Market-Seeking vs. Export-Platform FDI—both involve foreign production facilities, but market-seeking targets the host country's customers while export-platform uses the host country as a manufacturing base for third markets. This distinction is critical for understanding location decisions.
These categories describe where in the industry value chain the investment occurs, connecting directly to concepts of scope economies and supply chain control.
Compare: Horizontal vs. Vertical FDI—horizontal expands the firm's geographic footprint within its core business, while vertical deepens control over inputs or outputs. A semiconductor company building a chip factory abroad is horizontal; that same company acquiring a foreign rare earth mining operation is backward vertical FDI.
Some FDI types prioritize spreading risk across markets, industries, or partners rather than maximizing control or efficiency.
Compare: Conglomerate FDI vs. Joint Ventures—both reduce risk, but through different mechanisms. Conglomerate FDI diversifies across industries while maintaining full control; joint ventures share risk with partners while staying in familiar industries. Joint ventures also provide local knowledge that conglomerate investments typically lack.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Full control entry modes | Greenfield, M&A |
| Speed-to-market priority | Brownfield, M&A |
| Market access motivation | Market-Seeking FDI, Horizontal FDI |
| Cost/efficiency motivation | Export-Platform FDI, Vertical FDI |
| Strategic capability building | Strategic Asset-Seeking FDI |
| Risk mitigation approaches | Conglomerate FDI, Joint Ventures |
| Supply chain control | Vertical FDI (backward and forward) |
| Partnership-based entry | Joint Ventures |
A European automaker wants to enter the Indian market quickly to capture growing middle-class demand but lacks local supplier relationships. Which two FDI types should it consider, and what trade-offs does each involve?
Compare and contrast Greenfield investment and Brownfield investment in terms of control, speed, and risk. Under what circumstances would a firm choose each?
A pharmaceutical company acquires a biotech startup in another country primarily for its patent portfolio and research team. Which FDI motivation does this represent, and how does it differ from market-seeking FDI?
Explain how Export-Platform FDI and Market-Seeking FDI might lead a firm to choose different host country locations, even within the same region.
If an FRQ describes a firm entering a foreign market where regulations require local ownership participation, which FDI type is most appropriate, and what strategic considerations should the firm address in structuring the arrangement?