Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Qualitative research is the backbone of understanding why consumers behave the way they do—not just what they purchase or how often. When you're tested on market research, you need to demonstrate that you understand the difference between methods that generate numbers and methods that generate meaning. These techniques help marketers uncover motivations, emotions, cultural influences, and the messy human context that surveys alone can't capture.
You're being tested on your ability to match the right technique to the right research question. Can you identify when a focus group beats an interview? Do you know why ethnography reveals insights that observation alone might miss? Don't just memorize definitions—know what each technique is best suited for, what kind of data it produces, and how it complements other methods in a research design.
These techniques involve structured dialogue between researchers and participants. The core mechanism is verbal exchange—researchers ask questions, probe responses, and build understanding through conversation.
Compare: In-depth interviews vs. focus groups—both rely on conversation, but interviews isolate individual perspectives while focus groups reveal how people influence each other. If an exam asks about understanding personal motivations, choose interviews; for social dynamics around a product, choose focus groups.
These techniques prioritize watching over asking. The core mechanism is behavioral documentation—researchers record what people actually do rather than what they say they do.
Compare: Ethnography vs. observational research—both watch behavior, but ethnography seeks deep cultural understanding through immersion while observation focuses on documenting specific actions. Ethnography asks "what does this mean to them?" while observation asks "what are they doing?"
These techniques analyze existing materials rather than generating new data through interaction. The core mechanism is systematic interpretation of texts, images, or media.
Compare: Content analysis vs. case studies—content analysis examines materials systematically across many sources, while case studies examine situations comprehensively using multiple methods. Use content analysis for media trends; use case studies for understanding specific brand successes or failures.
These techniques prioritize understanding how individuals interpret and make meaning from their lives. The core mechanism is capturing subjective reality—how the world looks from the participant's perspective.
Compare: Phenomenology vs. narrative research—both center participant perspectives, but phenomenology seeks the essence of an experience type while narrative research examines how stories shape meaning. Phenomenology asks "what is it like to experience X?" while narrative asks "how do people tell the story of X?"
These techniques access insights that participants might not articulate directly. The core mechanism is bypassing conscious filters—revealing attitudes and motivations below surface awareness.
Compare: Projective techniques vs. grounded theory—projective techniques access hidden individual attitudes, while grounded theory builds new theoretical frameworks from participant data. Use projective techniques when you suspect people can't or won't articulate their true feelings; use grounded theory when you're exploring genuinely new territory.
| Research Goal | Best Techniques |
|---|---|
| Understanding individual motivations | In-depth interviews, phenomenology |
| Exploring group dynamics and social influence | Focus groups |
| Observing actual behavior | Observational research, ethnography |
| Understanding cultural context | Ethnographic research, narrative research |
| Analyzing existing media/communications | Content analysis |
| Accessing subconscious attitudes | Projective techniques |
| Building new theory from scratch | Grounded theory |
| Deep analysis of specific situations | Case studies |
A researcher wants to understand why teenagers feel embarrassed discussing skincare with parents. Which two techniques would best access these sensitive, potentially subconscious feelings, and why?
Compare and contrast ethnographic research and observational research. When would you choose immersion over simple observation?
Your client wants to understand how their brand is perceived on social media over the past five years. Which technique is most appropriate, and what would it reveal that focus groups couldn't?
A startup is entering a market with no existing research or theory about consumer behavior. Which technique allows them to build understanding from the ground up, and how does its iterative process work?
An FRQ asks you to design a qualitative research plan for understanding the lived experience of first-generation college students choosing a laptop. Which technique captures subjective experience, and how would you complement it with a method that reveals what they actually do when shopping?