Why This Matters
Educational psychology isn't just theory—it's the foundation for every decision you'll make as an educator. When you understand how students learn, why they're motivated (or not), and what developmental factors shape their thinking, you can design instruction that actually works. Expect exam questions that ask you to apply these concepts to classroom scenarios, compare theorists' perspectives, and identify which approach best addresses a specific learning challenge.
These concepts fall into interconnected categories: learning theories explain the mechanisms of knowledge acquisition, developmental frameworks address how learners change over time, motivation and mindset drive engagement, and instructional applications translate theory into practice. Don't just memorize names and definitions—know what problem each theory solves and when you'd choose one approach over another.
Learning Theories: How Knowledge Is Acquired
These foundational theories represent different answers to a core question: What actually happens when someone learns? Each theory emphasizes different mechanisms—external reinforcement, internal mental processing, or social construction of meaning.
Behaviorism
- Observable behavior is the focus—behaviorists argue that internal mental states can't be scientifically studied, so learning is measured through behavioral change
- Conditioning shapes learning through stimulus-response associations; classical conditioning (Pavlov) and operant conditioning (Skinner) are the two primary mechanisms
- Reinforcement and punishment are the teacher's primary tools—positive reinforcement increases desired behaviors while punishment decreases unwanted ones
Cognitivism
- Mental processes take center stage—unlike behaviorism, cognitivism examines thinking, memory, and problem-solving as the core of learning
- Information processing model compares the mind to a computer; learners encode, store, and retrieve information through working memory and long-term memory
- Prior knowledge matters because new information must connect to existing schemas; this explains why activating background knowledge improves comprehension
Constructivism
- Learners build their own understanding—knowledge isn't transmitted from teacher to student but actively constructed through experience and reflection
- Social interaction drives learning in social constructivism; collaborative activities, discussions, and peer teaching are essential instructional strategies
- Hands-on, authentic tasks promote deeper understanding than passive listening; problem-based learning and inquiry-based instruction are key applications
Social Learning Theory
- Observation and imitation are primary learning mechanisms—Albert Bandura demonstrated that people learn by watching others, not just through direct experience
- Modeling is the teacher's most powerful tool; students learn behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions by observing models they respect
- Self-efficacy—one's belief in their ability to succeed—mediates whether observed behaviors are actually performed
Compare: Behaviorism vs. Social Learning Theory—both acknowledge the role of reinforcement, but behaviorism requires direct experience while social learning allows for vicarious reinforcement through observation. If an FRQ asks about learning without direct practice, social learning theory is your answer.
Developmental Frameworks: How Learners Change Over Time
Development isn't just about age—it's about readiness. These theories help you understand what students can and can't do at different stages and how to scaffold instruction appropriately.
Developmental Theories (Piaget and Vygotsky)
- Piaget's stages of cognitive development describe qualitative shifts in thinking: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational—each stage determines what kinds of learning are possible
- Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) identifies the gap between what learners can do independently and what they can do with guidance—this is where instruction should target
- Scaffolding is the instructional application of ZPD; teachers provide temporary support that's gradually removed as competence develops
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
- Basic needs must be met first—students who are hungry, tired, or feel unsafe cannot focus on higher-level learning; the hierarchy moves from physiological → safety → belonging → esteem → self-actualization
- Belonging and esteem needs explain why classroom climate matters; students who feel excluded or incompetent disengage from learning
- Self-actualization represents reaching full potential—but educators must address lower-level needs before expecting students to pursue growth and creativity
Compare: Piaget vs. Vygotsky—both are developmental theorists, but Piaget emphasizes individual cognitive maturation while Vygotsky emphasizes social interaction and cultural tools. Piaget says wait for readiness; Vygotsky says scaffold beyond current ability.
Individual Differences: Recognizing Diverse Learners
Not all students learn the same way or demonstrate intelligence through the same channels. These frameworks help educators recognize and respond to diversity in the classroom.
Multiple Intelligences
- Gardner identified eight intelligences beyond traditional IQ: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic
- Traditional schooling privileges linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligences, potentially undervaluing students with strengths in other areas
- Instructional implications include offering multiple pathways to demonstrate understanding and incorporating varied activities that tap different intelligences
Learning Styles
- Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) are the most commonly cited preferences—some students learn better through seeing, hearing, or doing
- Research support is limited—while students may have preferences, matching instruction to "styles" hasn't consistently improved outcomes; this is a contested concept
- Practical value lies in encouraging instructional variety rather than rigidly categorizing students into fixed learning types
Differentiated Instruction
- Content, process, and product can all be differentiated based on students' readiness, interests, and learning profiles
- Flexible grouping allows students to work with different peers depending on the task, avoiding permanent tracking
- Equitable access is the goal—differentiation isn't about giving some students less work but about providing appropriate challenge and support for all
Compare: Multiple Intelligences vs. Learning Styles—both address individual differences, but Gardner's theory has stronger empirical support and focuses on types of ability rather than preferred modalities. Be prepared to discuss the controversy around learning styles on exams.
Motivation and Mindset: Why Students Engage
Understanding motivation answers the critical question: Why do some students try while others give up? These concepts help you design instruction that fosters engagement and persistence.
Motivation Theories
- Intrinsic motivation comes from internal interest and satisfaction; extrinsic motivation comes from external rewards or consequences—both influence behavior, but intrinsic motivation is more sustainable
- Self-efficacy (belief in one's ability) and goal orientation (mastery vs. performance goals) are key predictors of academic success
- Autonomy, competence, and relatedness drive motivation according to self-determination theory—students engage more when they have choice, feel capable, and belong
Growth Mindset
- Carol Dweck's research distinguishes between fixed mindset (abilities are innate and unchangeable) and growth mindset (abilities develop through effort and practice)
- Praise process over talent—telling students they're "smart" promotes fixed mindset; praising effort and strategy promotes growth mindset
- Failure becomes feedback in a growth mindset classroom; mistakes are learning opportunities rather than evidence of inadequacy
Compare: Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation—both can drive behavior, but over-reliance on extrinsic rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation (the overjustification effect). Use extrinsic motivators strategically, not as the default.
Instructional Applications: Translating Theory to Practice
These concepts bridge the gap between understanding how students learn and actually designing effective instruction and assessment.
Bloom's Taxonomy
- Six cognitive levels form a hierarchy: remembering → understanding → applying → analyzing → evaluating → creating—higher levels require more complex thinking
- Assessment alignment means matching test questions and tasks to intended cognitive levels; many teachers over-test remembering and under-test higher-order skills
- Revised taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl) uses verbs instead of nouns and switches the top two levels, placing creating at the highest level
- Thinking about thinking—metacognitive awareness involves knowing what you know, recognizing when you don't understand, and selecting appropriate learning strategies
- Self-regulation includes planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning; strong metacognitive skills predict academic success across subjects
- Explicit instruction in metacognitive strategies (like self-questioning and summarizing) improves learning outcomes, especially for struggling students
Classroom Management
- Proactive strategies prevent problems before they occur—clear expectations, consistent routines, and engaging instruction reduce misbehavior
- Withitness (Kounin's term) describes teachers' awareness of everything happening in the classroom; effective managers address issues before they escalate
- Positive relationships are foundational; students behave better for teachers they respect and feel cared for by
Assessment and Evaluation
- Formative assessment is ongoing and informs instruction (assessment for learning); summative assessment evaluates learning at the end (assessment of learning)
- Feedback quality matters more than grades—specific, timely feedback that identifies next steps improves learning more than letter grades alone
- Assessment data drives instruction—effective teachers use results to identify gaps and adjust teaching, not just to assign grades
Compare: Formative vs. Summative Assessment—both measure learning, but they serve different purposes. Formative assessment is low-stakes and diagnostic; summative assessment is high-stakes and evaluative. Strong instruction balances both.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Learning as behavior change | Behaviorism, Social Learning Theory |
| Learning as mental processing | Cognitivism, Metacognition |
| Learning as meaning-making | Constructivism |
| Developmental readiness | Piaget's stages, Vygotsky's ZPD, Maslow's hierarchy |
| Individual differences | Multiple Intelligences, Learning Styles, Differentiated Instruction |
| Student motivation | Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, Growth Mindset, Self-efficacy |
| Higher-order thinking | Bloom's Taxonomy, Metacognition |
| Classroom environment | Classroom Management, Maslow's hierarchy |
| Measuring learning | Formative Assessment, Summative Assessment |
Self-Check Questions
-
A student learns to raise her hand after seeing classmates get called on when they do so. Which two theories best explain this, and how do they differ in their explanation?
-
Compare Piaget's and Vygotsky's views on the relationship between development and instruction. How would each theorist respond to the question: "Should we wait for readiness or push beyond it?"
-
A teacher notices that a student who usually participates has become withdrawn and disengaged. Using Maslow's hierarchy, what factors should the teacher investigate before assuming the student is unmotivated?
-
Design a lesson on the American Revolution that addresses at least three of Gardner's intelligences. Which intelligences would be hardest to incorporate, and why?
-
An FRQ asks you to explain how a teacher could use both formative assessment and growth mindset principles to help struggling students improve. What specific strategies would you recommend?