Decision-Making Models

Why This Matters

Decision-making is the core activity of management—every planning, organizing, leading, and controlling function ultimately comes down to choices. Your exam will test whether you understand when to use different decision-making approaches and why certain models fit certain situations. The models in this guide range from highly structured analytical frameworks to approaches that embrace uncertainty and intuition, and you'll need to recognize which context calls for which approach.

Don't just memorize the names and steps of each model. Instead, focus on the underlying assumptions each model makes about human cognition, available information, and organizational dynamics. When you see an exam scenario describing a time-pressured manager with incomplete data, you should immediately connect that to bounded rationality or intuitive decision-making—not the rational model. Understanding the why behind each model transforms memorization into application.

---

Structured Analytical Models

These models assume decision-makers can systematically gather information, evaluate alternatives, and select optimal solutions. They work best when you have time, data, and clear criteria for success.

Rational Decision-Making Model

• Follows a sequential, logical process—identify the problem, generate alternatives, evaluate options against criteria, select the best choice, implement, and evaluate results
• Assumes complete information and predictable outcomes—decision-makers are viewed as fully rational actors who can objectively weigh all factors
• Serves as the theoretical ideal against which other models are compared, though rarely achievable in real-world management situations

Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Quantifies trade-offs in financial terms—systematically compares expected costs against anticipated benefits for each alternative
• Supports resource allocation decisions—particularly valuable for capital budgeting, project selection, and policy evaluation
• Requires monetizing intangibles—a key limitation is that some factors (employee morale, brand reputation) resist easy quantification

Decision Tree Analysis

• Maps choices visually as branching paths—each node represents a decision point or chance event, with branches showing possible outcomes
• Incorporates probability and expected value—allows managers to calculate $\text{Expected Value} = \sum(\text{Probability} \times \text{Outcome})$ for each path
• Clarifies complex, sequential decisions—especially useful when one choice leads to additional decisions down the line

---

Cognitive Limitation Models

These models acknowledge that human brains have processing limits and that perfect rationality is impossible. Herbert Simon's work on bounded rationality revolutionized how we understand managerial decision-making.

Bounded Rationality Model

• Recognizes cognitive constraints—decision-makers face limits in attention, memory, and information-processing capacity
• Emphasizes "satisficing" behavior—managers search only until they find an option that meets minimum acceptable criteria, then stop
• Accounts for environmental factors—time pressure, incomplete information, and organizational context all shape what's possible

Satisficing Model

• Seeks "good enough" rather than optimal—combines the word "satisfy" with "suffice" to describe realistic decision behavior
• Reduces decision costs—exhaustive searches for the best option consume time and resources that may exceed the value gained
• Reflects how experienced managers actually operate—they rely on decision rules and heuristics developed through practice

Intuitive Decision-Making Model

• Leverages pattern recognition and experience—experts develop mental models that allow rapid assessment without conscious analysis
• Valuable under time pressure or ambiguity—when data is incomplete or situations are novel, intuition fills the gap
• Subject to cognitive biases—confirmation bias, anchoring, and overconfidence can distort intuitive judgments

---

Participative Decision Models

These models focus on who should be involved in decisions and how to leverage collective input. The key insight is that the right level of participation depends on situational factors.

Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision-Making Model

• Prescribes optimal participation levels—uses a decision tree to guide leaders through questions about decision quality, commitment needs, and information availability
• Identifies five decision styles—ranges from autocratic (leader decides alone) through consultative (leader seeks input) to group-based (shared decision-making)
• Balances efficiency against acceptance—some decisions need speed, others need buy-in; this model helps match approach to situation

Delphi Technique

• Aggregates expert judgment anonymously—participants respond to questionnaires in multiple rounds without face-to-face interaction
• Reduces groupthink and social pressure—anonymity prevents dominant personalities from skewing results
• Builds toward consensus iteratively—after each round, participants see summarized responses and can revise their positions

---

Strategic and Organizational Models

These models address decision-making at the organizational level, considering competitive position, environmental factors, and organizational dynamics.

SWOT Analysis

• Examines four strategic dimensions—Strengths and Weaknesses (internal factors) plus Opportunities and Threats (external factors)
• Bridges internal capabilities with external environment—effective strategy aligns what you're good at with what the market rewards
• Precedes rather than replaces decision-making—SWOT is a diagnostic tool that informs subsequent choices, not a decision method itself

Garbage Can Model

• Describes organizational decision-making as chaotic—problems, solutions, participants, and choice opportunities mix together unpredictably
• Challenges rational assumptions—decisions often emerge from timing and coincidence rather than systematic analysis
• Applies to "organized anarchies"—organizations with unclear goals, uncertain technology, and fluid participation (universities and government agencies are classic examples)

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A manager has 30 minutes to decide whether to accept a supplier's time-limited offer. She has worked with this supplier for years and has a strong sense of their reliability. Which decision-making model best describes her likely approach, and why is the rational model inappropriate here?

2. Compare and contrast bounded rationality and satisficing. How does one concept explain the other, and in what type of exam scenario would you reference each?

3. An organization is deciding whether to enter a new market. Which two models from this guide would you combine—one for strategic analysis and one for evaluating financial implications—and what would each contribute?

4. The Vroom-Yetton-Jago model and the Delphi Technique both involve group input. What key situational factor would lead you to recommend one over the other?

5. A nonprofit organization has unclear goals, high staff turnover, and decisions that seem to happen randomly. Which model best describes their decision-making process, and what does this model suggest about the role of timing in organizational choices?