Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Community policing represents a fundamental shift in how law enforcement operates—moving from a reactive, incident-driven model to a proactive, relationship-centered approach. When you encounter exam questions about policing philosophies, you're being tested on your understanding of legitimacy, procedural justice, and co-production of public safety. These strategies aren't just feel-good initiatives; they address core tensions in democratic policing: How do police maintain order while preserving civil liberties? How does trust affect compliance? What role should citizens play in their own safety?
The strategies below illustrate key criminological concepts including social disorganization theory, routine activities theory, and broken windows theory. You'll see how environmental design reduces crime opportunities, how informal social control complements formal policing, and why perceived legitimacy often matters more than arrest rates. Don't just memorize program names—know what underlying principle each strategy demonstrates and how they work together to transform police-community dynamics.
These strategies shift policing from responding to 911 calls toward systematically identifying and eliminating the root causes of crime and disorder. The underlying principle: addressing underlying conditions prevents more crime than arresting offenders after the fact.
Compare: Problem-Oriented Policing vs. Collaborative Problem-Solving—both address root causes, but POP is police-led and data-driven while collaborative approaches center community voice. FRQs often ask which is more sustainable or legitimate; collaborative models score higher on procedural justice measures.
Increased police presence isn't just about deterrence—it's about accessibility and humanization. These strategies recognize that trust develops through repeated positive interactions, not just crime-fighting success.
Compare: Foot Patrols vs. Community Meetings—foot patrols build individual relationships through informal contact, while meetings create formal collective input mechanisms. Both increase legitimacy, but meetings better address systemic concerns while patrols address interpersonal trust.
These strategies apply routine activities theory and rational choice theory—if you remove opportunities for crime, motivated offenders can't act. The focus shifts from changing people to changing places.
Compare: CPTED vs. Neighborhood Watch—CPTED modifies physical environments while Neighborhood Watch strengthens social environments. Both reduce crime opportunities, but CPTED works passively (design does the work) while watches require active resident participation. Exam tip: If asked about sustainable, low-cost strategies, CPTED changes persist even when participation wanes.
Community policing recognizes that police alone cannot solve complex social problems. These strategies formalize co-production by linking law enforcement with other institutions that influence public safety.
Compare: Community Partnerships vs. Citizen Police Academies—partnerships focus on institutional collaboration to solve problems, while academies build individual understanding to increase legitimacy. Both reduce the us-vs-them dynamic, but partnerships produce tangible outcomes while academies primarily shift perceptions.
These strategies address two critical legitimacy challenges: building trust with populations historically alienated from police and ensuring officers can navigate diverse communities effectively.
Compare: Youth Outreach vs. Cultural Diversity Training—outreach changes community members' perceptions of police, while training changes officers' behavior toward communities. Both address legitimacy gaps, but outreach is preventive (building future trust) while training is corrective (fixing current problems). Strong FRQ answers discuss how these complement each other.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Procedural Justice | Community meetings, citizen academies, collaborative problem-solving |
| Routine Activities Theory | CPTED, neighborhood watch, foot patrols |
| Social Disorganization Theory | Neighborhood watch, community partnerships, youth outreach |
| Co-Production of Safety | Collaborative problem-solving, community partnerships, neighborhood watch |
| Police Legitimacy | Cultural diversity training, citizen academies, community meetings |
| Proactive vs. Reactive Policing | Problem-oriented policing, CPTED, youth outreach |
| Environmental Criminology | CPTED, foot patrols, neighborhood watch |
| Institutional Collaboration | Community partnerships, youth outreach programs |
Which two strategies most directly apply routine activities theory by increasing capable guardianship, and how do they differ in whether guardians are police or civilians?
Compare problem-oriented policing and collaborative problem-solving: What does each approach prioritize, and which better demonstrates procedural justice principles? Explain your reasoning.
If a department wants to improve legitimacy with a community that has historically distrusted police, which three strategies would you recommend implementing together, and why do they complement each other?
How do CPTED and neighborhood watch programs both reduce crime opportunities while relying on fundamentally different mechanisms? Which is more sustainable if community participation declines?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate whether community policing strategies actually reduce crime or merely reduce fear of crime. Using the Newark Foot Patrol Experiment and at least two other strategies, construct an argument that addresses both outcomes.