Community Development Strategies

Why This Matters

Community development strategies represent the practical application of community psychology's core values—you're being tested not just on what these strategies are, but on how they redistribute power, build collective efficacy, and create sustainable change. These approaches connect directly to foundational concepts like ecological systems theory, empowerment, and social justice, which appear throughout your coursework and exams. Understanding the mechanisms behind each strategy helps you analyze why some interventions succeed while others fail.

When you encounter these strategies on an exam, you'll need to distinguish between approaches that focus on individual capacity, relational networks, or systemic change. Don't just memorize definitions—know what principle each strategy operationalizes and when you'd recommend one over another. The ability to compare strategies and match them to specific community contexts is what separates surface-level recall from genuine understanding.

---

Strengths-Based Approaches

These strategies reject the traditional deficit model that defines communities by their problems. Instead, they begin with the assumption that every community already possesses resources, knowledge, and capabilities that can drive change.

Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD)

• Starts with mapping existing strengths—identifies local skills, associations, and institutions before addressing any gaps or needs
• Shifts ownership to community members rather than outside experts, increasing sustainability and reducing dependency on external funding
• Builds on three asset categories: individual capacities, citizen associations, and local institutions working in coordination

Capacity Building

• Develops infrastructure for long-term independence—focuses on skills, leadership pipelines, and organizational systems rather than one-time interventions
• Prioritizes local leadership development to ensure communities can sustain progress after external support ends
• Encourages horizontal knowledge sharing among community members and organizations, strengthening internal networks

---

Power and Collective Action

These strategies address the fundamental question of who holds power and how marginalized groups can gain influence over decisions affecting their lives. They operationalize empowerment theory at both individual and community levels.

Community Organizing

• Mobilizes collective power around shared grievances—transforms individual frustrations into coordinated campaigns for systemic change
• Builds relational power through trust networks that can be activated for future issues, not just immediate concerns
• Centers grassroots leadership from affected communities rather than professional advocates speaking on their behalf

Empowerment Theory and Practice

• Operates at three levels: personal (self-efficacy), interpersonal (critical awareness), and political (collective action)
• Addresses power imbalances directly by building skills, confidence, and access to resources among marginalized groups
• Measures success by control gained—asks whether individuals and communities have increased decision-making authority over their own lives

---

Research and Assessment Methods

Effective community development requires understanding community conditions—but how you gather that understanding matters. These approaches ensure that data collection itself becomes an empowering, participatory process.

Participatory Action Research (PAR)

• Positions community members as co-researchers, not just subjects—they help design questions, collect data, and interpret findings
• Produces actionable knowledge explicitly intended to drive social change, not just academic publications
• Incorporates critical reflection cycles where participants analyze their own experiences and challenge dominant narratives

Community Needs Assessment

• Systematically identifies both needs and assets—provides baseline data for planning and later evaluation
• Engages community voice in prioritization to ensure interventions address what residents actually care about
• Informs resource allocation decisions by documenting gaps between current conditions and desired outcomes

---

Relational Infrastructure

Social change doesn't happen through isolated individuals—it requires connections. These strategies focus on building and strengthening the relational fabric that makes collective action possible.

Social Capital Development

• Distinguishes bonding capital (ties within similar groups) from bridging capital (ties across different groups)—communities need both
• Strengthens trust and reciprocity norms that enable cooperation without formal contracts or enforcement
• Correlates with measurable outcomes including civic participation, health indicators, and economic mobility

Collaborative Partnerships

• Brings diverse stakeholders to shared tables—community members, nonprofits, government agencies, and private sector actors
• Enables resource pooling and expertise sharing to address complex problems no single organization could solve alone
• Requires explicit attention to power dynamics to prevent well-resourced partners from dominating decision-making

---

Planning and Implementation

Moving from understanding to action requires intentional structures. These strategies provide frameworks for translating community aspirations into concrete, measurable progress.

Strategic Planning

• Sets long-term goals with measurable benchmarks—provides direction while allowing tactical flexibility
• Incorporates diverse stakeholder input during goal-setting to increase buy-in and legitimacy
• Builds in evaluation and adaptation mechanisms so strategies can evolve as conditions change

Community Engagement and Mobilization

• Creates multiple pathways for participation—from attending meetings to leading initiatives, accommodating different capacity levels
• Uses varied communication channels to reach residents who might not engage through traditional forums
• Fosters psychological sense of community by giving members meaningful roles and recognition

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two strategies most directly challenge the deficit model of community intervention, and what do they emphasize instead?

2. A community psychologist wants to ensure that research findings lead to actual policy change while building participants' critical consciousness. Which strategy best fits this goal, and why?

3. Compare and contrast Community Organizing and Empowerment Practice—how do their primary targets differ, and when might you use each?

4. If an FRQ asks you to design an intervention that builds long-term community independence from outside funders, which strategies would you prioritize and in what sequence?

5. How does Social Capital Development relate to the success of Collaborative Partnerships? Explain the connection using the concepts of bonding and bridging capital.