Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're designing or analyzing autonomous robots, actuator selection is everything—it determines what forces your robot can exert, how precisely it can move, and what environments it can operate in. You're being tested on understanding why engineers choose specific actuators for specific tasks, not just what each actuator does. The core concepts here include torque and force generation, precision vs. power tradeoffs, feedback control systems, and energy source requirements.
Think of actuators as the muscles of your robot: some are built for raw strength, others for surgical precision, and still others for speed or flexibility. As you study, don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each actuator solves and when you'd choose one over another. If an exam question describes a robot task, you should immediately recognize which actuator category fits best and why.
Electric motors convert electrical energy into rotational motion and represent the most common actuator family in robotics. The key differentiator among electric motors is how they balance continuous motion, positional precision, and control complexity.
Compare: Servo motors vs. stepper motors—both offer positional control, but servos use closed-loop feedback for absolute positioning while steppers rely on counting discrete steps. Choose servos when you need to know exact position; choose steppers when you need repeatable incremental motion at lower cost.
Fluid power systems use pressurized gases or liquids to generate motion, offering force densities that electric motors struggle to match. The tradeoff is system complexity—you need compressors, pumps, reservoirs, and careful sealing.
Compare: Pneumatic vs. hydraulic actuators—both use fluid power, but pneumatics trade precision for speed and simplicity (compressible air, lower pressures), while hydraulics deliver superior force and control at the cost of weight and complexity. FRQ tip: if a question mentions "heavy payload" or "construction," think hydraulic; if it mentions "speed" or "gripping," think pneumatic.
Many robotic tasks require straight-line motion rather than rotation. Linear actuators solve the rotation-to-translation problem through various mechanical and electromagnetic approaches.
Compare: Linear actuators vs. solenoids—both produce straight-line motion, but linear actuators offer continuous, controlled displacement while solenoids provide only binary (on/off) positions. Use linear actuators for adjustable reach; use solenoids for latches and triggers.
When movements must be measured in micrometers or response times in microseconds, specialized actuators exploit material properties rather than conventional motors. These actuators sacrifice range of motion for extraordinary precision.
Compare: Piezoelectric actuators vs. shape memory alloys—both enable compact, precise actuation, but piezoelectrics offer speed with tiny displacements while SMAs provide larger strokes at slower rates. Piezoelectrics win for vibration and fine positioning; SMAs win for bio-inspired designs needing muscle-like contuation.
Traditional rigid actuators struggle with delicate objects and unstructured environments. Soft actuators prioritize compliance and adaptability over raw force and precision.
Compare: Artificial muscles vs. servo motors—servos offer precise, repeatable positioning with rigid structures, while artificial muscles sacrifice precision for compliance and adaptability. If your robot handles eggs or works alongside humans, artificial muscles provide inherent safety that rigid actuators require complex control systems to achieve.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Continuous rotation | DC motors |
| Precise angular positioning | Servo motors, stepper motors |
| Open-loop position control | Stepper motors |
| High force-to-weight ratio | Pneumatic actuators |
| Maximum force output | Hydraulic actuators |
| Linear motion conversion | Linear actuators, solenoids |
| Nanometer-scale precision | Piezoelectric actuators |
| Bio-inspired actuation | Shape memory alloys, artificial muscles |
| Soft/compliant motion | Artificial muscles |
| Binary on/off switching | Solenoids |
A mobile robot needs variable-speed wheel control without precise positioning. Which actuator type is most appropriate, and why would a stepper motor be overkill for this application?
Compare and contrast pneumatic and hydraulic actuators: what shared principle do they rely on, and what key property of their working fluids creates their different strengths?
You're designing a robotic gripper that must handle both steel bolts and fresh strawberries. Which two actuator categories would you consider, and what tradeoff does each represent?
A scanning electron microscope requires positioning adjustments of 10 nanometers with response times under 1 millisecond. Which actuator type fits these requirements, and why would shape memory alloys fail here?
An FRQ describes a soft robotic arm for elderly care that must be inherently safe during human contact. Explain why artificial muscles might be preferred over servo motors, referencing the concept of compliance.