upgrade
upgrade

🤖Intro to Autonomous Robots

Common Robotic Actuators

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

When you're designing or analyzing autonomous robots, actuator selection is everything—it determines what forces your robot can exert, how precisely it can move, and what environments it can operate in. You're being tested on understanding why engineers choose specific actuators for specific tasks, not just what each actuator does. The core concepts here include torque and force generation, precision vs. power tradeoffs, feedback control systems, and energy source requirements.

Think of actuators as the muscles of your robot: some are built for raw strength, others for surgical precision, and still others for speed or flexibility. As you study, don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each actuator solves and when you'd choose one over another. If an exam question describes a robot task, you should immediately recognize which actuator category fits best and why.


Electric Motor Actuators

Electric motors convert electrical energy into rotational motion and represent the most common actuator family in robotics. The key differentiator among electric motors is how they balance continuous motion, positional precision, and control complexity.

DC Motors

  • Continuous rotation from direct current—the simplest electric actuator, converting DC power directly into spinning motion without discrete positioning
  • Speed control via voltage modulation—adjust input voltage or use pulse-width modulation (PWM) to vary rotational speed smoothly
  • Ideal for wheeled locomotion—mobile robots and drive systems where continuous, variable-speed rotation matters more than exact positioning

Servo Motors

  • Closed-loop position control—integrated feedback sensors (typically potentiometers or encoders) enable precise angular positioning to fractions of a degree
  • Three-wire interface—power, ground, and PWM signal make them easy to integrate with microcontrollers for commanded positions
  • Essential for articulated joints—robotic arms, pan-tilt mechanisms, and any application where the actuator must reach and hold specific angles

Stepper Motors

  • Discrete angular steps without feedback—divide full rotation into fixed increments (commonly 1.8° or 200 steps/revolution), enabling open-loop position control
  • Holding torque when stationary—maintain position under load without continuous power draw, useful for static positioning tasks
  • Repeatability over absolute accuracy—excel in CNC machines and 3D printers where consistent incremental movement matters most

Compare: Servo motors vs. stepper motors—both offer positional control, but servos use closed-loop feedback for absolute positioning while steppers rely on counting discrete steps. Choose servos when you need to know exact position; choose steppers when you need repeatable incremental motion at lower cost.


Fluid Power Actuators

Fluid power systems use pressurized gases or liquids to generate motion, offering force densities that electric motors struggle to match. The tradeoff is system complexity—you need compressors, pumps, reservoirs, and careful sealing.

Pneumatic Actuators

  • Compressed air for rapid, high-force motion—air's compressibility allows fast acceleration and natural compliance (give) when encountering obstacles
  • Excellent force-to-weight ratio—lightweight actuators can exert substantial force, ideal for pick-and-place systems and grippers
  • Challenging for precise positioning—air compressibility makes fine position control difficult without additional feedback systems

Hydraulic Actuators

  • Incompressible fluid for maximum force—hydraulic oil transmits pressure without volume loss, enabling precise force control and enormous power output
  • Heavy-duty applications—construction equipment, industrial presses, and large robotic systems where force requirements exceed electric motor capabilities
  • System complexity tradeoff—requires pumps, reservoirs, high-pressure lines, and careful maintenance; less suitable for portable or lightweight robots

Compare: Pneumatic vs. hydraulic actuators—both use fluid power, but pneumatics trade precision for speed and simplicity (compressible air, lower pressures), while hydraulics deliver superior force and control at the cost of weight and complexity. FRQ tip: if a question mentions "heavy payload" or "construction," think hydraulic; if it mentions "speed" or "gripping," think pneumatic.


Linear Motion Actuators

Many robotic tasks require straight-line motion rather than rotation. Linear actuators solve the rotation-to-translation problem through various mechanical and electromagnetic approaches.

Linear Actuators

  • Rotation-to-linear conversion—use lead screws, ball screws, or rack-and-pinion mechanisms to transform motor rotation into straight-line displacement
  • Multiple power sources available—can be electric, pneumatic, or hydraulic depending on force, speed, and precision requirements
  • Telescoping and extending applications—robotic arms, lift mechanisms, and any system requiring controlled extension along a single axis

Solenoids

  • Electromagnetic linear snap action—energizing a coil pulls a ferromagnetic plunger, creating rapid on/off linear motion
  • Binary positioning only—designed for two-state operation (extended/retracted), not proportional control
  • Fast response for switching tasks—door locks, valve controls, and triggering mechanisms where speed matters more than variable positioning

Compare: Linear actuators vs. solenoids—both produce straight-line motion, but linear actuators offer continuous, controlled displacement while solenoids provide only binary (on/off) positions. Use linear actuators for adjustable reach; use solenoids for latches and triggers.


Precision and Micro-Scale Actuators

When movements must be measured in micrometers or response times in microseconds, specialized actuators exploit material properties rather than conventional motors. These actuators sacrifice range of motion for extraordinary precision.

Piezoelectric Actuators

  • Crystal deformation under voltage—piezoelectric materials physically expand or contract when electrical fields are applied, producing nanometer-scale displacements
  • Microsecond response times—no mechanical inertia to overcome, enabling extremely fast actuation cycles
  • Precision optics and microscopy—lens positioning, scanning probe microscopes, and any application requiring sub-micron adjustments

Shape Memory Alloys

  • Temperature-driven phase change—alloys like Nitinol "remember" a preset shape and return to it when heated above their transition temperature
  • Muscle-like contraction—can contract up to 8% of length, mimicking biological muscle behavior in a compact form factor
  • Slow cycling limitation—heating and cooling takes time, restricting these actuators to applications where actuation speed isn't critical

Compare: Piezoelectric actuators vs. shape memory alloys—both enable compact, precise actuation, but piezoelectrics offer speed with tiny displacements while SMAs provide larger strokes at slower rates. Piezoelectrics win for vibration and fine positioning; SMAs win for bio-inspired designs needing muscle-like contuation.


Soft and Bio-Inspired Actuators

Traditional rigid actuators struggle with delicate objects and unstructured environments. Soft actuators prioritize compliance and adaptability over raw force and precision.

Artificial Muscles

  • Biomimetic flexibility—polymer-based or pneumatic structures that bend, stretch, and contract like biological tissue
  • Inherent compliance for safe interaction—naturally absorb impacts and conform to irregular shapes, critical for human-robot collaboration
  • Soft robotics applications—grippers handling fragile objects, wearable exoskeletons, and robots operating in unpredictable environments

Compare: Artificial muscles vs. servo motors—servos offer precise, repeatable positioning with rigid structures, while artificial muscles sacrifice precision for compliance and adaptability. If your robot handles eggs or works alongside humans, artificial muscles provide inherent safety that rigid actuators require complex control systems to achieve.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Continuous rotationDC motors
Precise angular positioningServo motors, stepper motors
Open-loop position controlStepper motors
High force-to-weight ratioPneumatic actuators
Maximum force outputHydraulic actuators
Linear motion conversionLinear actuators, solenoids
Nanometer-scale precisionPiezoelectric actuators
Bio-inspired actuationShape memory alloys, artificial muscles
Soft/compliant motionArtificial muscles
Binary on/off switchingSolenoids

Self-Check Questions

  1. A mobile robot needs variable-speed wheel control without precise positioning. Which actuator type is most appropriate, and why would a stepper motor be overkill for this application?

  2. Compare and contrast pneumatic and hydraulic actuators: what shared principle do they rely on, and what key property of their working fluids creates their different strengths?

  3. You're designing a robotic gripper that must handle both steel bolts and fresh strawberries. Which two actuator categories would you consider, and what tradeoff does each represent?

  4. A scanning electron microscope requires positioning adjustments of 10 nanometers with response times under 1 millisecond. Which actuator type fits these requirements, and why would shape memory alloys fail here?

  5. An FRQ describes a soft robotic arm for elderly care that must be inherently safe during human contact. Explain why artificial muscles might be preferred over servo motors, referencing the concept of compliance.