Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Organic reactions are the vocabulary of molecular transformation. On your exam, you're being tested on your ability to predict products, explain mechanisms, and choose the right reaction for a given synthesis problem. These reactions aren't random; they follow predictable patterns based on nucleophilicity, electrophilicity, substrate structure, and reaction conditions. Master the underlying logic, and you'll be able to tackle any mechanism question thrown at you.
The reactions in this guide represent the core toolkit of organic synthesis. From building carbon-carbon bonds to interconverting functional groups, each reaction type illustrates fundamental principles like carbocation stability, stereoelectronic effects, and kinetic vs. thermodynamic control. Don't just memorize reagents and products. Know why each reaction proceeds the way it does and what concept it demonstrates.
These reactions share a common starting point (an alkyl halide or similar substrate) but diverge based on nucleophile strength, base strength, substrate structure, and solvent choice. Understanding when substitution wins over elimination is one of the most heavily tested skills in organic chemistry.
SN2 is a concerted, one-step mechanism. The nucleophile attacks the electrophilic carbon from the backside as the leaving group departs, resulting in inversion of configuration (Walden inversion). Because the nucleophile must access the carbon directly, steric hindrance matters a lot. Primary substrates and methyl halides are ideal SN2 candidates.
SN1 proceeds through a carbocation intermediate. The leaving group departs first in a slow, rate-determining ionization step, and then the nucleophile attacks the planar carbocation. Because the nucleophile can attack from either face, you get racemization at the stereocenter. Tertiary substrates favor SN1 because they form stable 3ยฐ carbocations. Polar protic solvents (like water or alcohols) stabilize both the carbocation and the departing leaving group, further promoting this pathway.
E2 is a concerted process that requires anti-periplanar geometry between the -hydrogen and the leaving group. A strong base abstracts the proton while the leaving group departs simultaneously, forming an alkene in one step. Strong, bulky bases (like ) strongly favor E2.
E1 shares the carbocation intermediate with SN1. After ionization, a weak base removes a proton from a carbon adjacent to the carbocation to form the alkene. Weak bases and polar protic solvents favor this stepwise pathway.
Zaitsev's rule governs regioselectivity: the more substituted (more stable) alkene typically predominates. The exception is when a bulky base like tert-butoxide is used, which has trouble reaching the more hindered proton and instead gives the less substituted Hofmann product.
Compare: SN2 vs. E2. Both are concerted and favor strong nucleophiles/bases, but SN2 requires good nucleophilicity while E2 requires good basicity. If an exam question gives you a bulky base like tert-butoxide, think E2. A good nucleophile like iodide (strong nucleophile, weak base) points to SN2.
Addition reactions transform bonds into bonds, converting alkenes and alkynes into more saturated products. The key is understanding electrophilic attack, carbocation intermediates, and stereochemical outcomes.
Electrophilic addition follows Markovnikov's rule. The electrophile (often ) adds to the less substituted carbon of the double bond, placing the positive charge (or eventual nucleophile attachment) on the more substituted carbon. This happens because the more substituted carbocation is more stable.
Stereochemistry depends on the mechanism:
The Diels-Alder reaction is a [4+2] cycloaddition that forms six-membered rings in a single concerted step. A conjugated diene (4 electrons) reacts with a dienophile (2 electrons) through a pericyclic mechanism with no intermediates.
The reaction is stereospecific: cis substituents on the dienophile remain cis in the product, and trans stays trans. Secondary orbital interactions favor the endo transition state, which typically gives the major product.
Electronic matching matters. The reaction is fastest when an electron-rich diene pairs with an electron-poor dienophile (normal electron demand). Electron-withdrawing groups on the dienophile (like or ) and electron-donating groups on the diene speed things up dramatically.
One more requirement: the diene must be in the s-cis conformation to react. If the diene is locked in s-trans (as in some rigid ring systems), the Diels-Alder cannot proceed.
Compare: Electrophilic addition vs. Diels-Alder. Both add across systems, but electrophilic addition is stepwise (via carbocation) while Diels-Alder is concerted. Diels-Alder builds rings and sets multiple stereocenters in one step, making it a favorite for synthesis questions.
Aromatic compounds undergo substitution rather than addition to maintain their stabilizing aromaticity. Electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) is the key mechanism, and directing effects determine where new substituents land.
The mechanism proceeds in two stages:
Substituent directing effects are critical for predicting products:
Common EAS reactions and the electrophiles they require:
Note that Friedel-Crafts reactions don't work on strongly deactivated rings (e.g., nitrobenzene) because the ring isn't nucleophilic enough.
Compare: EAS vs. Addition to Alkenes. Both involve electrophilic attack on electrons, but aromatic rings restore aromaticity through proton loss (substitution) rather than accepting a second addition. This distinction is fundamental to understanding aromatic stability.
Carbonyl compounds are electrophilic at carbon and can undergo nucleophilic addition, substitution at the carbonyl, or reactions at the -carbon. These reactions form the basis of most carbon-carbon bond-forming strategies.
The aldol reaction forms -hydroxy carbonyl compounds through these steps:
Dehydration can follow under heating or acid/base conditions: water is eliminated to give an -unsaturated carbonyl, a conjugated system stabilized by resonance. When dehydration occurs, the overall process is called an aldol condensation.
Crossed aldol reactions (using two different carbonyl compounds) can give mixtures of products. To get selectivity, you can use a non-enolizable partner (like benzaldehyde, which has no -hydrogens) as the electrophilic carbonyl, or use LDA (lithium diisopropylamide) to form one specific enolate quantitatively at low temperature.
Grignard reagents () are powerful carbon nucleophiles formed by reacting an alkyl or aryl halide with magnesium metal in anhydrous ether. They attack electrophilic carbonyl carbons to form new CโC bonds.
The product class depends on the carbonyl substrate:
Anhydrous conditions are essential. Grignard reagents are strong bases and react rapidly with any protic source (water, alcohols, carboxylic acids, amines), destroying the reagent before it can attack the carbonyl. Even moisture in the air can ruin the reaction.
Compare: Aldol vs. Grignard. Both form CโC bonds at carbonyls, but aldol uses an enolate (generated in situ from the substrate) while Grignard uses a pre-formed organometallic nucleophile. Aldol is reversible under the reaction conditions; Grignard addition is effectively irreversible. For converting an aldehyde to a specific secondary alcohol, Grignard gives you direct control over which carbon fragment you're adding.
These reactions change the oxidation state of carbon without forming new CโC bonds. Mastering the oxidation ladder () helps you predict products and plan retrosyntheses.
Compare: vs. . Both deliver hydride to carbonyls, but is far more reactive (and more dangerous to handle). Use when you need chemoselectivity, for example reducing a ketone in a molecule that also contains an ester. Use when you need to reduce resistant functional groups like esters or carboxylic acids.
Carboxylic acids and their derivatives undergo nucleophilic acyl substitution, where a nucleophile replaces the leaving group while preserving the carbonyl. Reactivity follows leaving group ability: acyl chloride > anhydride > ester > amide. This order reflects how good each leaving group is: is a much better leaving group than .
A derivative can be converted into any derivative lower on the reactivity scale (e.g., acyl chloride โ ester), but converting up the scale (e.g., amide โ ester) requires special activation.
Fischer esterification combines a carboxylic acid and an alcohol under acid catalysis. The mechanism proceeds as follows:
The reaction is reversible and equilibrium-controlled. To drive it forward, you can apply Le Chatelier's principle: use excess alcohol, remove water (with a Dean-Stark trap or molecular sieves), or both.
Transesterification exchanges one alcohol group for another on an existing ester, using acid or base catalysis. This reaction is used industrially in biodiesel production and polymer chemistry.
Compare: Fischer esterification vs. acyl chloride + alcohol. Both make esters, but Fischer is reversible and slow, while acyl chloride reactions are fast and irreversible ( is lost as a gas or neutralized). If a synthesis question requires high yield or mild conditions, the acyl chloride route is usually the better choice.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Carbocation intermediates | SN1, E1, Electrophilic addition (Markovnikov) |
| Concerted mechanisms | SN2, E2, Diels-Alder |
| CโC bond formation | Grignard, Aldol, Diels-Alder, Friedel-Crafts |
| Stereochemical control | SN2 (inversion), Diels-Alder (stereospecific), Halogenation (anti), Hydroboration (syn) |
| Directing effects | Electrophilic aromatic substitution |
| Oxidation state changes | Alcohol oxidation (PCC, Jones), Carbonyl reduction (, ) |
| Nucleophilic acyl substitution | Esterification, Transesterification, Acyl chloride reactions |
| Regioselectivity rules | Markovnikov (addition), Zaitsev (elimination) |
Which two reaction types share a carbocation intermediate, and how does this affect the competition between them when treating a tertiary alkyl halide with a weak nucleophile in a polar protic solvent?
Compare the stereochemical outcomes of SN2 and electrophilic bromination of an alkene. What specific mechanistic feature (backside attack vs. halonium ion) explains why one gives inversion and the other gives anti addition?
A student wants to convert a primary alcohol to an aldehyde without over-oxidizing to the carboxylic acid. Which reagent should they choose, and why does it stop at the aldehyde while Jones reagent does not?
Explain why electron-donating groups on a benzene ring direct incoming electrophiles to the ortho and para positions. Draw or describe the resonance structures of the sigma complex to support your answer.
You need to form a new CโC bond to convert benzaldehyde into a secondary alcohol. Compare the Grignard approach with the aldol approach. Which gives you more straightforward control over the product, and why?