Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Organic reactions are the vocabulary of molecular transformation—and on your exam, you're being tested on your ability to predict products, explain mechanisms, and choose the right reaction for a given synthesis problem. These reactions aren't random; they follow predictable patterns based on nucleophilicity, electrophilicity, substrate structure, and reaction conditions. Master the underlying logic, and you'll be able to tackle any mechanism question thrown at you.
The reactions in this guide represent the core toolkit of organic synthesis. From building carbon-carbon bonds to interconverting functional groups, each reaction type illustrates fundamental principles like carbocation stability, stereoelectronic effects, and kinetic vs. thermodynamic control. Don't just memorize reagents and products—know why each reaction proceeds the way it does and what concept it demonstrates.
These reactions share a common starting point—an alkyl halide or similar substrate—but diverge based on nucleophile strength, base strength, substrate structure, and solvent choice. Understanding when substitution wins over elimination (and vice versa) is one of the most heavily tested skills in organic chemistry.
Compare: SN2 vs. E2—both are concerted and favor strong nucleophiles/bases, but SN2 requires good nucleophilicity while E2 requires good basicity. If an exam question gives you a bulky base like tert-butoxide, think E2; a good nucleophile like iodide points to SN2.
Addition reactions transform bonds into bonds, converting alkenes and alkynes into more saturated products. The key is understanding electrophilic attack, carbocation intermediates, and stereochemical outcomes.
Compare: Electrophilic addition vs. Diels-Alder—both add across systems, but electrophilic addition is stepwise (via carbocation) while Diels-Alder is concerted. Diels-Alder builds rings and sets multiple stereocenters in one step, making it a favorite for synthesis questions.
Aromatic compounds undergo substitution rather than addition to maintain their stabilizing aromaticity. Electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) is the key mechanism, and directing effects determine where new substituents land.
Compare: EAS vs. Addition to Alkenes—both involve electrophilic attack on electrons, but aromatic rings restore aromaticity through proton loss (substitution) rather than accepting a second addition. This distinction is fundamental to understanding aromatic stability.
Carbonyl compounds are electrophilic at carbon and can undergo nucleophilic addition, substitution at the carbonyl, or reactions at the -carbon. These reactions form the basis of most carbon-carbon bond-forming strategies.
Compare: Aldol vs. Grignard—both form C–C bonds at carbonyls, but aldol uses an enolate (generated in situ from the substrate) while Grignard uses a pre-formed organometallic nucleophile. Aldol is reversible and thermodynamically controlled; Grignard is irreversible and kinetically driven.
These reactions change the oxidation state of carbon without forming new C–C bonds. Mastering oxidation levels—alkane → alcohol → aldehyde/ketone → carboxylic acid—helps you predict products and plan syntheses.
Compare: vs. —both deliver hydride to carbonyls, but is far more reactive (and more dangerous). Use when you need chemoselectivity; use when you need brute-force reduction of resistant functional groups like esters.
Carboxylic acids and their derivatives undergo nucleophilic acyl substitution, where a nucleophile replaces the leaving group while preserving the carbonyl. Reactivity follows the leaving group ability: acyl chloride > anhydride > ester > amide.
Compare: Fischer esterification vs. acyl chloride + alcohol—both make esters, but Fischer is reversible and slow, while acyl chloride reactions are fast and irreversible. Exam tip: if a synthesis question requires high yield or mild conditions, acyl chloride is usually the better route.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Carbocation intermediates | SN1, E1, Electrophilic addition (Markovnikov) |
| Concerted mechanisms | SN2, E2, Diels-Alder |
| C–C bond formation | Grignard, Aldol, Diels-Alder |
| Stereochemical control | SN2 (inversion), Diels-Alder (stereospecific), Addition (syn/anti) |
| Directing effects | Electrophilic aromatic substitution |
| Oxidation state changes | Alcohol oxidation, Carbonyl reduction |
| Nucleophilic acyl substitution | Esterification, Transesterification |
| Regioselectivity rules | Markovnikov (addition), Zaitsev (elimination) |
Which two reaction types share a carbocation intermediate, and how does this affect the competition between them when treating a tertiary alkyl halide with a weak nucleophile?
Compare the stereochemical outcomes of SN2 and electrophilic bromination of an alkene. What mechanistic feature explains why one gives inversion and the other gives anti addition?
A student wants to convert a primary alcohol to an aldehyde without over-oxidizing to the carboxylic acid. Which reagent should they choose, and why does it stop at the aldehyde?
Explain why electron-donating groups on a benzene ring direct incoming electrophiles to the ortho and para positions. How does resonance stabilization of the sigma complex account for this?
You need to form a new C–C bond to convert benzaldehyde into a secondary alcohol. Compare the Grignard approach with the aldol approach—which would you choose for this specific transformation, and why?