Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Cadences are the punctuation marks of music—they tell listeners when a phrase is complete, when to expect more, and how to feel about what they've just heard. On the AP Music Theory exam, you're being tested on your ability to identify cadences by ear, analyze them in scores, and understand why composers choose one cadence type over another. This isn't just about labeling chord progressions; it's about understanding how harmonic motion creates meaning, tension, and release in music.
The concepts at play here include harmonic function, voice leading, phrase structure, and listener expectation. Every cadence type manipulates these elements differently—some deliver the resolution we crave, others deliberately withhold it. Don't just memorize "V–I = PAC." Know what makes a cadence feel conclusive versus open, and why a composer might choose surprise over satisfaction. That deeper understanding is what separates a 3 from a 5.
These cadences bring the listener home to the tonic chord, creating varying degrees of closure. The strength of resolution depends on chord position, soprano note, and which chord precedes the tonic.
Compare: PAC vs. IAC—both move V–I, but PAC requires root position and tonic in soprano. On listening questions, a PAC sounds more "complete" and final. If an FRQ asks you to identify cadence type, check the soprano note first.
These cadences stop on the V chord, leaving the listener hanging. They create tension and expectation by denying the resolution to tonic.
Compare: Half Cadence vs. Phrygian Half Cadence—both end on V, but the Phrygian type specifically uses iv⁶ with that characteristic half-step bass motion. If you hear a half cadence in minor with a descending bass, it's likely Phrygian.
These cadences set up dominant-to-tonic resolution but deliver something unexpected instead. They exploit listener expectations built by authentic cadences to create drama and interest.
Compare: Deceptive vs. Interrupted Cadence—these terms are often used interchangeably, but "deceptive" typically means V–vi specifically, while "interrupted" can describe V resolving to any unexpected chord. Know your teacher's or exam's preferred terminology.
These cadences sidestep resolution altogether, keeping the harmonic motion fluid. They maintain forward momentum by refusing to land anywhere stable.
Compare: Deceptive vs. Evaded Cadence—deceptive cadences do resolve, just not where expected; evaded cadences avoid resolution entirely. Think of deceptive as "wrong answer" and evaded as "no answer yet."
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Strong resolution to tonic | PAC, Plagal Cadence |
| Weaker resolution to tonic | IAC |
| Pause on dominant | Half Cadence, Phrygian Half Cadence |
| Surprise/subverted expectation | Deceptive Cadence, Interrupted Cadence |
| Avoided resolution | Evaded Cadence |
| Uses leading tone (–) | PAC, IAC, Deceptive, Half Cadence |
| No leading tone | Plagal Cadence |
| Minor-key specific | Phrygian Half Cadence |
Both PAC and IAC involve V–I motion. What two specific requirements distinguish a PAC from an IAC?
You hear a cadence that ends on the dominant chord with the bass descending by half step. What cadence type is this, and in what key quality (major or minor) does it occur?
Compare and contrast the deceptive cadence and the plagal cadence: both involve resolution, but how do they differ in harmonic function and emotional effect?
A phrase ends V–vi. Your classmate calls it an "interrupted cadence" while you call it a "deceptive cadence." Who's right, and why might both terms apply?
If an FRQ asks you to identify a cadence that "prolongs tension before the final resolution," which cadence types could serve this function, and how do they achieve it differently?