Cialdini's Principles of Influence

Why This Matters

Understanding Cialdini's six principles isn't just about memorizing a list—it's about grasping the psychological mechanisms that drive human compliance and decision-making. These principles appear throughout persuasion theory because they represent fundamental cognitive shortcuts that people use to navigate complex social situations. You're being tested on your ability to identify which principle is at work in a given scenario, explain why it works psychologically, and predict how it might be applied or resisted.

The real exam skill here is recognizing that these principles operate on automatic processing—they bypass deliberate reasoning by triggering deeply ingrained social and cognitive patterns. Whether you're analyzing advertising campaigns, political rhetoric, or interpersonal influence attempts, you need to connect specific tactics to their underlying psychological foundations: social norms, cognitive consistency, heuristic processing, and loss aversion. Don't just memorize the six names—know what mental shortcut each principle exploits and when each is most effective.

---

Principles Based on Social Norms

These principles work because humans are fundamentally social creatures who rely on established norms about how to behave toward others and within groups. The psychological mechanism here is normative influence—we feel compelled to act in ways that align with social expectations.

Reciprocity

• Obligation to return favors—when someone gives us something, we experience psychological pressure to reciprocate, creating a cycle of exchange that maintains social bonds
• Pre-giving strategy exploits this norm through uninvited first favors like free samples, gifts, or concessions that trigger indebtedness even when unsolicited
• Compliance increases significantly after receiving something first, making this principle particularly effective in sales, negotiations, and relationship-building contexts

Liking

• Attraction enhances persuasion—we're more likely to say yes to people we find physically attractive, similar to ourselves, or who give us genuine compliments
• Rapport-building factors include similarity, familiarity, and association with positive things, which is why salespeople often find common ground before pitching
• Interpersonal connection serves as a persuasion multiplier, making other influence attempts more effective when the source is liked

---

Principles Based on Cognitive Consistency

These principles exploit our deep psychological need for internal coherence. Cognitive dissonance theory explains why we find inconsistency uncomfortable and will adjust our behavior or beliefs to restore harmony.

Commitment and Consistency

• Prior commitments drive future behavior—once we take a position or make a choice, we experience internal pressure to behave consistently with that commitment
• Foot-in-the-door technique leverages this through small initial requests that escalate to larger ones, as each "yes" creates pressure to maintain consistency
• Public commitments are strongest because they add social accountability to internal consistency needs, making written or witnessed pledges particularly binding

Social Proof

• Others' behavior guides our own—in uncertain situations, we look to what similar others are doing as evidence of correct behavior
• Uncertainty amplifies the effect—social proof is most powerful when we're unsure what to do and when the models are similar to us in relevant ways
• Pluralistic ignorance can result when everyone looks to others for cues, explaining phenomena like bystander inaction or the spread of misinformation

---

Principles Based on Cognitive Shortcuts

These principles work by triggering heuristic processing—mental shortcuts that help us make quick decisions without extensive deliberation. They're most effective when people lack motivation or ability to think carefully.

Authority

• Expertise triggers automatic deference—we're conditioned from childhood to comply with legitimate authorities, creating a powerful compliance shortcut
• Symbols of authority like titles, uniforms, and credentials can trigger deference even without genuine expertise, which is why con artists often impersonate professionals
• Trust and credibility form the foundation, but the principle can be exploited through superficial authority cues that bypass critical evaluation

Scarcity

• Limited availability increases perceived value—items or opportunities seem more desirable when they're rare, restricted, or diminishing in availability
• Loss aversion drives the effect—the psychological pain of losing something outweighs the pleasure of gaining it, making "limited time" offers psychologically compelling
• FOMO (fear of missing out) creates urgency that short-circuits deliberate decision-making, prompting quicker action with less evaluation

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two principles both rely on external social cues rather than internal psychological states, and how do they differ in what those cues signal?

2. A charity sends you free address labels before asking for a donation. Which principle is operating, and why is this more effective than simply asking for money?

3. Compare and contrast the foot-in-the-door technique (commitment/consistency) with the use of celebrity endorsements (authority/liking)—what different psychological mechanisms do they exploit?

4. If an FRQ presents a scenario where a product's sales increase after the company announces it's being discontinued, which principle explains this effect, and what underlying cognitive bias is at work?

5. Why might social proof backfire in situations involving undesirable behaviors (like littering or tax evasion), and which alternative principle might be more effective in those contexts?