Causes of World War I

Why This Matters

Understanding the causes of World War I is essential for grasping the seismic shift in European art and civilization that followed. You're being tested not just on what happened, but on how nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and alliance systems interconnected to create the conditions for unprecedented destruction. The war shattered nineteenth-century optimism about progress and rationality, directly inspiring movements from Dada to Expressionism that rejected traditional artistic values.

Don't just memorize a list of causes—know what each factor illustrates about the fragility of the European order. The exam will ask you to connect political instability to cultural transformation, to explain why artists responded to mechanized warfare with abstraction and absurdity. When you understand that the war emerged from systemic tensions rather than a single event, you'll be equipped to analyze how modernist art became a critique of the civilization that produced such catastrophe.

---

Structural Tensions: The System That Made War Possible

These underlying conditions created a Europe primed for conflict. The rigid architecture of alliances, military buildup, and competing nationalisms meant that any spark could ignite a continental fire.

Alliance Systems (Triple Alliance and Triple Entente)

• Two opposing blocs divided Europe—the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy) faced the Triple Entente (France, Russia, Britain), ensuring any conflict would spread
• Automatic escalation replaced diplomatic flexibility; a local dispute could trigger continent-wide mobilization within days
• Balance of power logic backfired catastrophically, as alliances designed to prevent war instead guaranteed its expansion

Militarism and the Arms Race

• Military spending skyrocketed across Europe between 1870 and 1914, with Germany and Britain competing fiercely in naval construction
• War planning became bureaucratic—elaborate mobilization timetables like Germany's Schlieffen Plan left little room for last-minute diplomacy
• Cultural glorification of war permeated European society, from school curricula to public monuments, making armed conflict seem noble rather than catastrophic

---

Ideological Fuel: Nationalism and Imperial Competition

Nationalism provided the emotional energy that turned structural tensions into active hostility, while imperial ambitions gave nations concrete reasons to clash.

Nationalism and Competing Imperial Ambitions

• Ethnic nationalism destabilized multi-ethnic empires, particularly Austria-Hungary where Slavic groups sought independence or union with Serbia
• National prestige became tied to military strength and colonial possessions, making compromise appear as weakness
• Pan-movements—Pan-Slavism, Pan-Germanism—created transnational loyalties that complicated diplomacy and inflamed tensions

Colonial Tensions and Competition for Overseas Territories

• The Scramble for Africa (1880s-1900s) brought European powers into direct competition, with crises in Morocco nearly triggering war in 1905 and 1911
• Economic imperialism drove nations to secure raw materials and markets, linking overseas expansion to industrial survival
• Colonial rivalries reinforced European antagonisms—Britain viewed Germany's naval expansion as a direct threat to its empire's lifeline

Rise of Germany as a Major Industrial and Military Power

• Rapid industrialization transformed Germany into Europe's leading industrial economy by 1900, challenging British economic dominance
• Weltpolitik (world policy)—Kaiser Wilhelm II's aggressive pursuit of colonial and naval power—alarmed Britain and France
• Geographic anxiety plagued German strategists who feared encirclement by France and Russia, encouraging preemptive military thinking

---

The Powder Keg: Regional Instability and Imperial Decline

The Balkans concentrated all of Europe's tensions—nationalism, great-power rivalry, and imperial decay—into one volatile region.

Decline of the Ottoman Empire

• The "Sick Man of Europe" lost territory throughout the nineteenth century, creating a power vacuum that Austria-Hungary and Russia rushed to fill
• Newly independent Balkan states (Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania) pursued nationalist agendas that threatened Austria-Hungary's Slavic territories
• Great-power interests collided as Russia championed Pan-Slavism while Austria-Hungary sought to suppress Serbian influence

Balkans Conflicts and Instability

• The Balkan Wars (1912-1913) doubled Serbia's territory and population, alarming Austria-Hungary and emboldening Serbian nationalists
• "Powder keg of Europe" became the common metaphor—the region's ethnic complexity and great-power involvement made conflict nearly inevitable
• Assassination networks like the Black Hand operated with tacit Serbian government support, blurring lines between state policy and terrorism

---

The Trigger: From Crisis to Catastrophe

The assassination of Franz Ferdinand didn't cause the war—it activated the system of tensions that made war possible.

Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand

• June 28, 1914—Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist, killed the Austro-Hungarian heir and his wife Sophie in Sarajevo
• Austria-Hungary's ultimatum to Serbia (July 23) was deliberately designed to be unacceptable, providing justification for war
• The July Crisis demonstrated how alliance obligations and mobilization timetables transformed a regional dispute into world war within five weeks

---

Underlying Pressures: Economic and Social Factors

Material conditions and internal unrest shaped how governments approached the crisis—and why some leaders saw war as a solution to domestic problems.

Economic Rivalries Between European Powers

• Industrial competition intensified as Germany challenged Britain's manufacturing dominance and France's financial leadership
• Tariff wars and trade disputes poisoned diplomatic relations and linked economic interests to national security
• Colonial markets became essential for industrial economies, making overseas expansion a matter of economic survival rather than mere prestige

Social and Political Unrest Within European Nations

• Labor movements and socialist parties grew rapidly, threatening established political orders and alarming conservative elites
• Domestic crisis made foreign adventure attractive—some leaders believed war would unite fractured societies against external enemies
• The "short war illusion" prevailed; most expected quick victory, not the grinding attrition that would radicalize European populations

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two causes best illustrate how structural conditions limited diplomatic options during the July Crisis, and what specific mechanisms made de-escalation difficult?

2. Compare and contrast how nationalism functioned differently in Germany versus the Balkans—what did each seek, and why did Balkan nationalism pose a particular threat to Austria-Hungary?

3. If an FRQ asks you to explain why a regional assassination led to world war, which three factors would you emphasize, and in what order of importance?

4. How did economic rivalries and colonial competition reinforce nationalist sentiment? Identify two specific examples where imperial ambitions intensified European tensions.

5. Some historians argue that internal social unrest made European leaders more willing to risk war. Using evidence from this guide, evaluate whether domestic pressures contributed to the outbreak of World War I.