Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Behavior modification isn't just about keeping a classroom quiet—it's about understanding the psychological principles that drive human behavior and applying them strategically to create environments where learning can flourish. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish between techniques that increase desired behaviors versus those that decrease undesired ones, and critically, on knowing when and how to apply each approach effectively.
These techniques draw from operant conditioning and behavioral psychology, concepts that appear throughout educational psychology and classroom management frameworks. The key insight? Every technique works through a specific mechanism—adding or removing stimuli, reinforcing or extinguishing responses. Don't just memorize definitions; know what principle each technique demonstrates and when you'd choose one over another in a real classroom scenario.
Reinforcement is the backbone of behavior modification—it's how we make good behaviors stick. The core principle: any consequence that increases the likelihood of a behavior recurring is reinforcement, whether we're adding something pleasant or removing something unpleasant.
Compare: Positive Reinforcement vs. Negative Reinforcement—both increase desired behavior, but positive adds a pleasant stimulus while negative removes an unpleasant one. If an exam question describes removing homework after good behavior, that's negative reinforcement, not a reward in the traditional sense.
When individual reinforcement isn't enough, systematic approaches provide consistency and clear expectations. These techniques formalize the reinforcement process, making consequences predictable and transparent for students.
Compare: Token Economy vs. Behavior Contracts—both create structured expectations, but token economies work well for whole-class management while behavior contracts are better suited for individual students needing targeted intervention. Use contracts when you need specificity and student collaboration.
Sometimes you need to decrease problematic behaviors rather than build new ones. These techniques work by either applying consequences or removing reinforcement, but they require careful implementation to avoid unintended effects.
Compare: Time-Out vs. Response Cost—both reduce behavior through removal, but time-out removes the student from the environment while response cost removes earned rewards from the student. Response cost works best within an established token economy; time-out works independently but requires a reinforcing classroom environment to be meaningful.
Some behaviors can't be built or eliminated overnight. These techniques work through incremental change over time, requiring patience and consistent application.
Compare: Shaping vs. Extinction—shaping builds behaviors up through gradual reinforcement, while extinction breaks behaviors down through consistent non-reinforcement. Both require patience and planning, but shaping is proactive (teaching new skills) while extinction is reactive (eliminating learned behaviors).
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Increasing behavior by adding stimuli | Positive Reinforcement, Token Economy |
| Increasing behavior by removing stimuli | Negative Reinforcement |
| Decreasing behavior by adding stimuli | Punishment (positive) |
| Decreasing behavior by removing stimuli | Time-Out, Response Cost, Punishment (negative) |
| Systematic/structured approaches | Token Economy, Behavior Contracts, Differential Reinforcement |
| Gradual behavior change | Shaping, Extinction |
| Individual intervention focus | Behavior Contracts, Shaping |
| Whole-class management | Token Economy, Differential Reinforcement |
A teacher removes a student's recess privileges after they complete their work early. Is this positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, or punishment? Explain your reasoning.
Which two techniques both involve removing something to decrease behavior, and how do they differ in what gets removed?
Compare and contrast token economies and behavior contracts: What classroom situations would make each approach more appropriate?
A student's attention-seeking behavior gets worse for two weeks after the teacher starts ignoring it, then gradually disappears. What phenomenon explains the initial increase, and which technique is being applied?
If you needed to teach a student a complex multi-step behavior they've never performed before, which technique would be most appropriate, and why wouldn't simple positive reinforcement work as well?