🖥️Human-Computer Interaction Unit 4 – Interaction Design: Process & Methods

Interaction design is all about creating user-friendly interfaces that make digital products a breeze to use. It's a process that combines understanding user needs, designing solutions, and testing them to ensure they're intuitive and enjoyable. This unit covers key concepts like affordances, signifiers, and mental models. It also dives into the design process, research methods, prototyping techniques, and usability testing. Ethical considerations and real-world case studies round out the topic.

What's This Unit All About?

  • Interaction design focuses on creating engaging interfaces enabling users to interact with products in an efficient and satisfying way
  • Involves understanding users' needs, designing interactive solutions, prototyping interfaces, and evaluating their usability
  • Draws from various disciplines including human-computer interaction, user experience design, and cognitive psychology
  • Aims to create intuitive, learnable, and enjoyable user experiences across various digital products (websites, mobile apps, software)
  • Considers the entire user journey, from initial engagement to task completion and long-term usage
    • Analyzes user flows, information architecture, and navigation patterns
    • Designs for different interaction modalities (touch, voice, gesture)
  • Iterative process involving user research, ideation, prototyping, testing, and refinement based on user feedback
  • Balances user needs, business goals, and technical feasibility to create successful interactive products

Key Concepts in Interaction Design

  • Affordances refer to an object's properties that suggest how it can be interacted with or used
    • Visible affordances provide clear visual cues (buttons, links, sliders)
    • Hidden affordances are less obvious but can be discovered through exploration (gestures, hotkeys)
  • Signifiers are perceptible indicators that communicate what actions are possible and how to perform them
    • Can be explicit labels, icons, or instructions guiding users
    • Should be noticeable, unambiguous, and consistent across the interface
  • Feedback acknowledges user actions and communicates the results or status of their interactions
    • Visual feedback includes changes in appearance, animations, or progress indicators
    • Auditory feedback uses sound effects or voice prompts to confirm actions or alert users
    • Haptic feedback engages the sense of touch through vibrations or resistance
  • Constraints limit the possible actions users can take to prevent errors and guide them towards intended interactions
    • Physical constraints make certain actions impossible due to the interface's design or layout
    • Logical constraints rely on users' understanding of relationships and conventions
    • Cultural constraints leverage learned behaviors and expectations shaped by social norms
  • Mental models represent users' understanding and expectations of how a system works based on prior experiences
    • Designers aim to create interfaces that align with users' existing mental models for intuitive interactions
    • Mismatched mental models lead to confusion, errors, and frustration
  • Learnability refers to how easily users can understand and start using an interface effectively
    • Influenced by familiarity, consistency, clear guidance, and progressive disclosure of complexity
  • Accessibility ensures that interfaces can be used by people with diverse abilities and disabilities
    • Involves designing for different visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive needs
    • Adheres to accessibility guidelines and standards (WCAG, Section 508)

The Interaction Design Process

  • Understand the problem space and define project goals, target users, and success metrics
  • Conduct user research to gather insights about users' needs, behaviors, and contexts
    • Methods include interviews, surveys, observation, and data analysis
    • Create user personas and scenarios to guide design decisions
  • Generate design ideas through sketching, brainstorming, and ideation techniques
    • Explore multiple concepts and variations before selecting the most promising ones
    • Create user flows and wireframes to map out the interaction architecture
  • Create prototypes to simulate and test the proposed interactions and interfaces
    • Low-fidelity prototypes (sketches, paper prototypes) are quick and cheap for early feedback
    • High-fidelity prototypes (interactive mockups, coded prototypes) provide more realistic experiences
  • Conduct usability testing with representative users to evaluate the design's effectiveness and identify improvements
    • Observe users interacting with the prototype and gather qualitative and quantitative feedback
    • Analyze results and prioritize design changes based on severity and impact
  • Iterate and refine the design based on testing insights and stakeholder feedback
    • Make necessary adjustments to interaction flows, layouts, and interface elements
    • Repeat prototyping and testing cycles until the design meets usability and user experience goals
  • Implement the final design in collaboration with development teams
    • Provide detailed specifications, assets, and guidelines to ensure accurate implementation
    • Conduct quality assurance testing to verify the implemented product matches the intended design
  • Monitor and analyze user behavior and feedback post-launch to identify areas for continuous improvement
    • Gather analytics data, user reviews, and support inquiries to inform future design iterations
    • Plan for updates and enhancements based on evolving user needs and technology advancements

User Research Methods

  • Interviews involve one-on-one conversations with users to gather in-depth insights about their needs, behaviors, and experiences
    • Can be structured with predefined questions or semi-structured to allow for exploration
    • Provide rich qualitative data but can be time-consuming and subject to interviewer bias
  • Surveys are questionnaires distributed to a larger sample of users to collect self-reported data
    • Can gather both quantitative and qualitative feedback on specific topics
    • Useful for measuring user attitudes, preferences, and satisfaction at scale
    • Require careful question design and sampling to ensure valid and reliable results
  • Observation involves watching users interact with a product or perform tasks in their natural context
    • Can be done in-person through field studies or remotely using screen recording and video conferencing
    • Reveals actual user behavior and uncovers pain points and opportunities for improvement
    • Requires minimal interference from the researcher to capture authentic interactions
  • Contextual inquiry combines observation and interviewing techniques to understand users' workflows and environments
    • Involves shadowing users as they perform tasks and asking questions to clarify their actions and thought processes
    • Provides deep insights into users' goals, challenges, and strategies within their real-world context
  • Diary studies ask users to self-report their experiences and activities over an extended period
    • Participants document their interactions, thoughts, and feelings through written entries, photos, or videos
    • Captures longitudinal data and reveals patterns and changes in user behavior over time
    • Requires clear instructions and motivation for participants to maintain consistent and detailed entries
  • Card sorting is a technique used to understand users' mental models and inform information architecture
    • Participants organize topics or content into categories that make sense to them
    • Can be done with physical cards or using online tools with virtual cards
    • Helps identify logical groupings, labeling preferences, and navigation structures
  • Usability testing involves observing users as they attempt to complete specific tasks with a product or prototype
    • Assesses the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of the user experience
    • Can be conducted in-person in a usability lab or remotely using online tools
    • Provides direct feedback on usability issues and areas for improvement

Prototyping Techniques

  • Sketching is a quick and informal way to visualize and communicate design ideas
    • Uses pen and paper to create rough drawings of interface layouts, interactions, and flows
    • Allows for rapid exploration and iteration of concepts without investing too much time or resources
  • Paper prototyping involves creating low-fidelity mockups using paper cutouts, sticky notes, and other physical materials
    • Simulates the basic structure and interactions of an interface for early user testing and feedback
    • Encourages collaborative design and facilitates quick modifications based on user input
  • Wireframing is the process of creating simplified visual representations of an interface's layout and structure
    • Focuses on the placement and hierarchy of elements without detailed visual design
    • Can be created using digital tools like Balsamiq, Sketch, or Figma for more polished and shareable artifacts
  • Clickable prototypes are interactive digital mockups that simulate the functionality and flow of an interface
    • Created using prototyping tools like InVision, Adobe XD, or Figma
    • Allows users to click through screens, interact with elements, and experience the overall navigation and behavior
    • Provides a more realistic and engaging representation of the design for user testing and stakeholder feedback
  • High-fidelity prototypes are detailed and visually refined representations of the final product
    • Incorporate realistic visual design, content, and interactions to closely resemble the intended user experience
    • Created using design and prototyping tools or by coding with web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript)
    • Used for more advanced usability testing, user research, and developer handoff
  • Motion prototypes demonstrate the animation, transitions, and micro-interactions within an interface
    • Created using specialized tools like Principle, Framer, or After Effects
    • Communicate the timing, easing, and choreography of interface elements to enhance the user experience
    • Help stakeholders and developers understand the intended motion design and behavior
  • Physical prototypes are tangible representations of a product's form, size, and materials
    • Created using 3D printing, foam modeling, or other fabrication techniques
    • Useful for testing ergonomics, haptics, and physical interactions of hardware products
    • Provide a tactile and spatial understanding of the design that digital prototypes cannot convey

Usability Testing and Evaluation

  • Usability testing assesses how well users can interact with a product to achieve their goals effectively, efficiently, and satisfactorily
    • Involves recruiting representative users to perform realistic tasks using the product or prototype
    • Observes and measures user behavior, performance, and subjective feedback to identify usability issues and improvements
  • Test planning involves defining the goals, scope, and logistics of the usability test
    • Identifies the research questions, target users, test scenarios, and success metrics
    • Determines the testing method (in-person, remote), location, equipment, and moderator roles
    • Develops the test script, data collection instruments, and participant recruitment criteria
  • Pilot testing is a practice run of the usability test with a small number of participants
    • Helps refine the test protocol, identify potential issues, and ensure smooth execution of the actual test
    • Allows moderators to practice their facilitation skills and troubleshoot any technical or logistical problems
  • Moderated testing involves a facilitator guiding participants through the test sessions and observing their behavior
    • Provides the opportunity to ask follow-up questions, clarify tasks, and probe for deeper insights
    • Requires skilled moderation to maintain objectivity, avoid leading questions, and manage time effectively
  • Unmoderated testing allows participants to complete the test sessions independently without a facilitator present
    • Uses online tools or platforms to deliver the test instructions, tasks, and data collection instruments
    • Enables larger sample sizes and more diverse participants but lacks the ability to probe or clarify in real-time
  • Remote testing conducts usability tests with participants in their own environment using screen sharing and video conferencing tools
    • Allows for testing with geographically dispersed users and reduces travel and facility costs
    • Requires reliable technology setup and clear communication to ensure smooth and effective sessions
  • In-person testing brings participants to a designated testing location, such as a usability lab or office
    • Provides a controlled environment with specialized equipment for observation and data collection
    • Allows for more direct interaction and nonverbal cues but may be more costly and time-consuming to organize
  • Quantitative data in usability testing includes metrics like task success rates, time on task, error rates, and satisfaction ratings
    • Provides objective and measurable indicators of usability performance
    • Allows for statistical analysis and comparison across different designs or user groups
  • Qualitative data in usability testing includes observations, participant comments, and subjective feedback
    • Provides rich insights into user behaviors, preferences, and experiences
    • Helps uncover the underlying reasons behind usability issues and informs design improvements
  • Reporting and recommendations communicate the key findings and actionable insights from the usability test
    • Summarizes the test objectives, methods, and participant demographics
    • Presents the quantitative and qualitative results with illustrative examples and quotes
    • Prioritizes the usability issues based on severity and impact on user experience
    • Provides specific design recommendations and next steps for addressing the identified issues

Ethical Considerations in Interaction Design

  • Accessibility ensures that products and services are usable by people with diverse abilities and disabilities
    • Involves designing for different visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive needs
    • Adheres to accessibility guidelines and standards (WCAG, Section 508) to remove barriers and promote inclusive experiences
  • Privacy protects users' personal information and data from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure
    • Involves implementing secure data collection, storage, and transmission practices
    • Provides clear privacy policies and user controls over data sharing and usage
    • Complies with relevant privacy regulations and standards (GDPR, CCPA)
  • Informed consent ensures that users understand and agree to the terms, risks, and implications of using a product or service
    • Provides clear and concise information about data collection, usage, and sharing practices
    • Obtains explicit user consent for any data processing or tracking activities
    • Allows users to revoke consent and opt-out of data collection at any time
  • Transparency communicates openly and honestly about a product's features, limitations, and potential consequences
    • Avoids deceptive or misleading design practices that manipulate user behavior or understanding
    • Discloses any conflicts of interest, sponsored content, or algorithmic biases
    • Provides clear terms of service and privacy policies that are easily accessible and understandable
  • Fairness and non-discrimination ensure that products and services treat all users equally and do not perpetuate biases or discrimination
    • Involves designing for diverse user populations and considering the potential impact on different groups
    • Tests for and mitigates any algorithmic biases or disparate outcomes based on user demographics or characteristics
    • Promotes inclusive and equitable experiences that respect user diversity and prevent harm or marginalization
  • Social responsibility considers the broader societal impact and ethical implications of design decisions
    • Involves designing for user well-being, safety, and positive social outcomes
    • Considers the potential unintended consequences and long-term effects of products on individuals and communities
    • Engages in responsible innovation and addresses ethical challenges proactively and transparently
  • Professional ethics guide the conduct and decision-making of designers in their practice
    • Involves adhering to codes of ethics and professional standards set by industry organizations (UXPA, IxDA)
    • Maintains integrity, objectivity, and confidentiality in client and user relationships
    • Seeks informed consent and protects participant privacy and well-being in user research and testing activities
  • Ethical design education prepares future designers to navigate the ethical challenges and responsibilities of their work
    • Involves integrating ethics and values into design curricula and training programs
    • Encourages critical thinking, moral reasoning, and ethical decision-making skills
    • Fosters a culture of ethical awareness and accountability within the design community

Putting It All Together: Case Studies

  • Case studies provide real-world examples of how interaction design principles and methods are applied in practice
    • Illustrate the challenges, constraints, and trade-offs involved in designing for specific user needs and contexts
    • Demonstrate the impact and value of user-centered design in achieving business and user goals
  • E-commerce website redesign case study
    • Problem: High cart abandonment rates and low conversion rates on an e-commerce website
    • User research: Conducted interviews, surveys, and usability testing to identify pain points and user needs
    • Design solutions: Streamlined the checkout process, improved product information and reviews, and optimized the mobile experience
    • Results: Increased conversion rates by 25%, reduced cart abandonment by 30%, and improved user satisfaction scores
  • Mobile banking app case study
    • Problem: Low adoption and usage of a mobile banking app due to usability and security concerns
    • User research: Conducted contextual inquiry and usability testing to understand user behaviors and expectations
    • Design solutions: Redesigned the app architecture and navigation, introduced biometric authentication, and provided clear error handling and feedback
    • Results: Increased app usage by 40%, reduced support calls by 20%, and improved user trust and loyalty
  • Healthcare patient portal case study
    • Problem: Low patient engagement and satisfaction with a healthcare provider's online portal
    • User research: Conducted interviews, surveys, and usability testing with patients and caregivers
    • Design solutions: Redesigned the portal interface for clarity and ease of use, introduced personalized health recommendations, and provided accessible educational content
    • Results: Increased portal adoption by 50%, improved patient-provider communication, and enhanced patient self-management and outcomes
  • Smart home thermostat case study
    • Problem: Complex and inconsistent user interfaces across different smart thermostat brands and models
    • User research: Conducted usability testing and comparative analysis of existing smart thermostat interfaces
    • Design solutions: Developed a unified and intuitive interface design system for smart thermostats, incorporating best practices for information hierarchy, controls, and feedback
    • Results: Improved user satisfaction and task completion rates, reduced learning curve and errors, and increased energy savings and comfort
  • Accessibility redesign case study
    • Problem: A university website that was not fully accessible to students with disabilities
    • User research: Conducted accessibility audits, user testing with assistive technologies, and interviews


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.