Groundwater exploration relies heavily on geophysical methods to map subsurface structures and locate water resources. Electrical resistivity, electromagnetic surveys, seismic techniques, and ground-penetrating radar provide valuable insights into aquifer properties and groundwater dynamics.
These methods also play a crucial role in contaminant transport studies and remediation efforts. By integrating geophysical data with other geological information, hydrogeologists can better understand and manage groundwater resources, ensuring their sustainable use and protection.
Electrical Resistivity and Electromagnetic Methods for Groundwater Exploration
Principles of Electrical Resistivity Methods
Top images from around the web for Principles of Electrical Resistivity Methods
Typical Values for Rocks — Electromagnetic Geophysics View original
Is this image relevant?
HESS - Exploring the regolith with electrical resistivity tomography in large-scale surveys ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Identification of Groundwater in Hard Rock Terrain Using 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Typical Values for Rocks — Electromagnetic Geophysics View original
Is this image relevant?
HESS - Exploring the regolith with electrical resistivity tomography in large-scale surveys ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Principles of Electrical Resistivity Methods
Typical Values for Rocks — Electromagnetic Geophysics View original
Is this image relevant?
HESS - Exploring the regolith with electrical resistivity tomography in large-scale surveys ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Identification of Groundwater in Hard Rock Terrain Using 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Typical Values for Rocks — Electromagnetic Geophysics View original
Is this image relevant?
HESS - Exploring the regolith with electrical resistivity tomography in large-scale surveys ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Electrical resistivity methods measure the resistance of subsurface materials to the flow of electrical current
Resistance varies depending on factors such as lithology, porosity, and water content
The electrical resistivity of rocks and sediments is primarily controlled by the amount and salinity of pore water
Saturated zones exhibit lower resistivity than unsaturated zones
Resistivity surveys can be conducted using various electrode configurations (Wenner, Schlumberger, dipole-dipole arrays)
Each configuration has different sensitivities to vertical and lateral variations in resistivity
Principles of Electromagnetic Methods
Electromagnetic (EM) methods (frequency-domain and time-domain EM) measure the response of subsurface materials to induced electromagnetic fields
Response is influenced by electrical conductivity
EM methods are sensitive to conductive materials
Clay-rich sediments and saline groundwater can be detected
Can be used to map variations in subsurface conductivity
The depth of investigation for electrical and EM methods depends on several factors
Electrode spacing, signal frequency, and subsurface resistivity/conductivity distribution
Interpreting Geophysical Data for Groundwater Resources
Inverting Geophysical Data for Subsurface Models
Electrical resistivity and EM data can be inverted to create 2D or 3D models of subsurface resistivity/conductivity distribution
Models can be interpreted in terms of lithology and hydrogeological properties
Low-resistivity zones in resistivity models may indicate the presence of saturated, permeable aquifers
High-resistivity zones may represent unsaturated or low-permeability formations
Conductive anomalies in EM data may be associated with clay-rich aquitards or saline groundwater
Resistive anomalies may indicate freshwater aquifers or bedrock units
Integrating Geophysical Data with Other Information
Integration of geophysical data with borehole logs, hydraulic data, and other geological information can improve the interpretation of aquifer geometry, extent, and hydraulic properties
Time-lapse geophysical surveys can be used to monitor changes in groundwater levels, salinity, or storage over time
Provides insights into aquifer dynamics and sustainability
Can help assess the long-term viability of groundwater resources
Seismic and Ground-Penetrating Radar in Hydrogeological Studies
Seismic Methods for Hydrogeological Characterization
Seismic methods (reflection and refraction surveys) measure the propagation and reflection of elastic waves in the subsurface
Elastic wave properties are influenced by density and elastic properties of rocks and sediments
Seismic data can provide information on subsurface stratigraphy, bedrock topography, and the presence of faults or other structural features
These features may affect groundwater flow
Seismic refraction surveys can be used to map the depth to bedrock or water table
Seismic velocities increase sharply at these interfaces
Ground-Penetrating Radar for Shallow Subsurface Imaging
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) uses high-frequency electromagnetic waves to image shallow subsurface features
Reflections occur at boundaries between materials with different dielectric properties
GPR can be used to map shallow aquifers, bedrock surfaces, and sedimentary structures
Can also detect subsurface utilities, cavities, or other anthropogenic features that may influence groundwater flow
The resolution and depth of penetration of seismic and GPR methods depend on several factors
Signal frequency, subsurface velocity, and attenuation properties of the materials
Geophysics in Contaminant Transport and Remediation
Characterizing Subsurface Properties for Contaminant Transport
Geophysical methods can be used to characterize the subsurface properties that control contaminant transport
Porosity, permeability, and hydraulic conductivity
Electrical resistivity and EM surveys can detect conductive contaminant plumes
Leachate from landfills or industrial sites can be mapped
Extent and migration of plumes can be monitored over time
Seismic and GPR methods can be used to identify preferential pathways for contaminant transport
Fractures, faults, or high-permeability zones can be detected
Can guide the placement of monitoring wells or remediation infrastructure
Monitoring Remediation Efforts with Geophysical Methods
Time-lapse geophysical monitoring can track the movement of contaminants in the subsurface
Can assess the effectiveness of remediation efforts (pump-and-treat systems, in-situ bioremediation)
Integration of geophysical data with hydrogeological models can improve the understanding of contaminant fate and transport
Supports the design and optimization of remediation strategies
Geophysical methods can also be used to monitor the performance of remediation technologies
Distribution of injected amendments or progress of in-situ chemical oxidation or reduction reactions can be tracked