Scapegoating

Definition

Scapegoating is the act of unfairly blaming an individual or group for problems or misfortunes, often to divert attention from the real issues. This tactic can be a damaging strategy in crisis management as it may temporarily relieve pressure from those truly responsible, while also harming the reputation of the scapegoated party.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Scapegoating can lead to long-term damage to the reputation of the person or group being blamed, as it often generates negative perceptions in the public eye.
2. Using scapegoating as a strategy can sometimes backfire, drawing attention to the organization’s failings rather than resolving the underlying issue.
3. It is often employed as a short-term tactic during crises when organizations seek to quickly shift blame away from themselves.
4. Scapegoating can undermine trust among stakeholders if they perceive the strategy as manipulative or dishonest.
5. Effective reputation repair strategies should aim to address the real causes of crises instead of resorting to scapegoating.

Review Questions

• How does scapegoating function as a short-term strategy in crisis management, and what are its potential consequences?
  • Scapegoating acts as a short-term strategy by redirecting blame away from the organization itself, aiming to reduce immediate pressure during a crisis. However, this tactic can lead to significant negative consequences, such as damaging the reputation of the scapegoated individual or group. It may also result in public backlash if stakeholders view the act as disingenuous, potentially complicating future crisis communication efforts.
• In what ways can scapegoating impact an organization's overall reputation and trustworthiness in the eyes of stakeholders?
  • Scapegoating can severely impact an organization's reputation by creating a perception of irresponsibility and lack of accountability. When stakeholders see that an organization is deflecting blame rather than addressing core issues, it can erode trust. This loss of credibility may lead to decreased stakeholder support and loyalty, making it more difficult for the organization to recover in future crises.
• Evaluate how organizations can effectively counteract the temptation to engage in scapegoating during a crisis while still addressing stakeholder concerns.
  • To counteract scapegoating, organizations should prioritize transparency and accountability in their crisis management efforts. They should focus on openly communicating the root causes of issues and outlining actionable steps taken to address them. By engaging directly with stakeholders and fostering an environment of honesty, organizations can build trust even in challenging situations, showing that they value ethical conduct over mere image preservation.

Related terms

Crisis Communication:

The process of conveying information to stakeholders during a crisis to manage public perception and maintain trust.

Attribution Theory:

A psychological framework that explains how individuals interpret events and assign causes to behaviors, often influencing perceptions of blame.

Reputation Management: The practice of shaping public perception of an organization or individual, especially during and after a crisis.