1. A university cognitive psychology department is investigating the sleep habits and behaviors of its undergraduate students.
The department initially proposes the following investigative question: "Do students get enough sleep?"
Identify one flaw in this investigative question and state a refined investigative question that addresses the flaw and focuses on a quantitative variable.
To collect data, a researcher posts a survey link on a popular social media page for university students, asking them to report their average nightly sleep duration. The first students who respond are used for the sample.
Identify the sampling method used. Describe a potential source of bias in this sampling method and explain how this bias could affect the estimate of the average nightly sleep duration for all undergraduate students at the university.
Recognizing the flaw in their initial plan, the department decides to obtain a simple random sample of undergraduate students. The mean sleep duration for this sample is hours with a standard deviation of hours. The distribution of sleep durations is approximately symmetric.
One student in the sample reported a sleep duration of hours. Calculate the -score for this student's sleep duration and interpret it in context. Based on the calculated -score, is this sleep duration considered an outlier? Justify your answer.
In a separate study, the department recruited undergraduate volunteers who reported poor sleep quality. The researchers randomly assigned volunteers to a "no screen time before bed" group and volunteers to continue their normal screen habits. After two weeks, the "no screen time" group had a significantly higher mean sleep duration.
To what population can the results of this experiment be generalized? Can the department conclude that the lack of screen time caused the increase in sleep duration? Justify your answers.
00:00