9.7 Memorandum writing
7 min read•august 21, 2024
Legal memoranda are essential tools in U.S. law practice, providing structured of legal issues. They help lawyers organize complex information, evaluate outcomes, and communicate findings effectively within the legal system.
Memoranda can be internal or external, with different considerations for confidentiality and audience. Objective analysis is crucial, requiring unbiased evaluation of all relevant arguments, including those that may not favor the 's position.
Purpose of legal memoranda
- Legal memoranda serve as crucial analytical tools in United States law practice, providing structured for various legal issues
- Memoranda help lawyers organize complex legal information, evaluate potential outcomes, and communicate findings effectively within the legal system
Internal vs external memoranda
Top images from around the web for Internal vs external memoranda
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Memorandums – An Introduction to Technical Communication View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 22: Memos – Communication at Work View original
Is this image relevant?
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Memorandums – An Introduction to Technical Communication View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Internal vs external memoranda
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Memorandums – An Introduction to Technical Communication View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 22: Memos – Communication at Work View original
Is this image relevant?
The Rhetorical Situation – Essentials for ENGL-121 View original
Is this image relevant?
Memorandums – An Introduction to Technical Communication View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Internal memoranda remain confidential within a law firm or legal department, addressing internal decision-making processes
- External memoranda communicate legal analysis to clients or other outside parties, requiring careful consideration of tone and content
- Internal memos often use more technical legal language, while external memos may require plain language explanations for non-lawyer audiences
- Confidentiality concerns differ significantly between internal and external memoranda, impacting the level of detail included
Objective analysis in memoranda
- Objective analysis forms the cornerstone of legal memoranda, requiring unbiased evaluation of legal issues
- Lawyers must present all relevant legal arguments, including those that may not favor their client's position
- Balanced analysis includes consideration of counterarguments and potential weaknesses in legal positions
- Objective analysis helps lawyers and clients make informed decisions about legal strategies and potential outcomes
Structure of legal memoranda
Heading and citation format
- Heading includes essential identifying information (to, from, date, subject)
- Proper citation format follows the Bluebook or other specified legal citation guidelines
- Consistent citation style throughout the memo ensures credibility and ease of reference
- Heading may include additional elements like file numbers or matter identifiers for organizational purposes
Question presented section
- Concisely states the legal issue(s) to be addressed in the memorandum
- Focuses on the specific legal question rather than factual details
- May use single sentence or multiple sentence format depending on complexity
- Sets the scope and direction for the entire memorandum
Brief answer section
- Provides a succinct response to the question presented
- Includes a clear statement of the likely outcome or
- Briefly outlines the key legal principles or reasoning supporting the conclusion
- Serves as a quick reference point for busy readers or decision-makers
Statement of facts
- Presents relevant facts objectively and chronologically
- Excludes irrelevant or prejudicial information
- Provides necessary context for the legal analysis that follows
- May include procedural history if relevant to the legal issue
Discussion section
- Forms the bulk of the memorandum, containing detailed legal analysis
- Applies the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) method or variations
- Synthesizes relevant case law, statutes, and other legal authorities
- Addresses potential counterarguments and alternative interpretations
Conclusion
- Reiterates the main findings and recommendations
- Provides clear guidance or next steps based on the legal analysis
- Addresses any remaining uncertainties or areas requiring further investigation
- Maintains an objective tone while offering practical advice
Writing the question presented
Single sentence format
- Concisely states the legal issue in one carefully crafted sentence
- Begins with a question word (whether, does, can) to frame the issue
- Incorporates key facts and relevant legal concepts
- Example: "Whether an employer's dress code policy prohibiting visible tattoos violates an employee's First Amendment rights?"
Multiple sentence format
- Uses two or three sentences to present more complex legal issues
- First sentence typically introduces the general legal area or context
- Subsequent sentences narrow down to the specific legal question at hand
- Allows for inclusion of additional relevant facts or legal elements
Under-does-when paradigm
- Structures the question presented using a specific formula: Under [relevant law], does [subject] [action] when [key facts]?
- Provides a clear and consistent format for presenting legal issues
- Helps readers quickly identify the key components of the legal question
- Example: "Under California employment law, does an employer violate anti-discrimination statutes when implementing a dress code policy that prohibits visible tattoos?"
Crafting the brief answer
Concise summary of conclusion
- Begins with a clear "yes" or "no" response to the question presented
- Provides a one or two sentence summary of the overall conclusion
- Avoids introducing new information not mentioned in the question presented
- Serves as a quick reference point for readers seeking the bottom line
Key reasoning elements
- Outlines the main legal principles or precedents supporting the conclusion
- Briefly mentions any significant facts that influenced the analysis
- Addresses potential limitations or qualifications to the conclusion
- Provides a roadmap for the more detailed discussion section that follows
Drafting the statement of facts
Relevant vs irrelevant facts
- Includes only facts directly related to the legal issue at hand
- Omits extraneous details that do not impact the legal analysis
- Considers both favorable and unfavorable facts to maintain objectivity
- Focuses on legally significant events, actions, or circumstances
Chronological organization
- Presents facts in a logical, time-based sequence
- Uses clear transitions to guide readers through the timeline of events
- Highlights key dates or time periods relevant to the legal issue
- Helps readers understand the progression of events leading to the legal question
Objective tone in fact presentation
- Avoids argumentative or persuasive language when stating facts
- Presents information neutrally without characterizing or interpreting events
- Uses precise language to describe actions and events without editorializing
- Maintains credibility by allowing facts to speak for themselves without bias
Developing the discussion section
IRAC method application
- Issue: Restates the legal question in more detail
- Rule: Identifies and explains relevant legal principles, statutes, or precedents
- Analysis: Applies the rules to the specific facts of the case
- Conclusion: Summarizes the outcome of the analysis for each issue
Rule explanation and synthesis
- Clearly states the relevant legal rules or principles
- Explains the rationale behind the rules and their development in case law
- Synthesizes multiple sources of law to create a coherent legal framework
- Identifies any conflicts or ambiguities in the applicable rules
Fact application to rules
- Systematically applies the facts of the case to each element of the legal rules
- Draws analogies to similar cases or distinguishes from dissimilar precedents
- Evaluates how different factual scenarios might impact the legal outcome
- Considers both supporting and opposing factual elements
Counter-arguments and rebuttal
- Anticipates and addresses potential arguments against the primary conclusion
- Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of alternative legal interpretations
- Provides reasoned rebuttals to counter-arguments using legal principles and facts
- Demonstrates a thorough and balanced analysis of all aspects of the legal issue
Conclusion writing techniques
Reaffirming main points
- Summarizes the key findings from the discussion section
- Restates the overall conclusion in light of the detailed analysis
- Highlights the most persuasive legal arguments or precedents
- Provides a clear and concise wrap-up of the legal reasoning
Addressing client concerns
- Relates the legal conclusion back to the practical implications for the client
- Offers guidance on potential next steps or courses of action
- Identifies any remaining areas of uncertainty or risk
- Suggests additional research or fact-finding if necessary to strengthen the legal position
Legal research for memoranda
Primary vs secondary sources
- Primary sources include constitutions, statutes, regulations, and case law
- Secondary sources encompass legal treatises, law review articles, and restatements
- Primary sources carry more weight in legal analysis and argumentation
- Secondary sources provide valuable context, explanations, and synthesis of primary law
Case law analysis
- Identifies relevant precedents from binding and persuasive jurisdictions
- Extracts key legal principles and reasoning from court decisions
- Evaluates the factual similarities and differences between precedents and the current case
- Considers the hierarchy of courts and the precedential value of different decisions
Statutory interpretation
- Analyzes the plain language of relevant statutes or regulations
- Considers legislative history and intent when interpreting ambiguous provisions
- Applies canons of statutory construction to resolve conflicts or ambiguities
- Examines how courts have interpreted similar statutory language in past cases
Ethical considerations
Duty of confidentiality
- Protects client information from unauthorized disclosure
- Applies to both the content of legal memoranda and the underlying client communications
- Requires careful handling of sensitive information in both internal and external memoranda
- May necessitate redaction or omission of certain details in external communications
Avoiding misrepresentation
- Presents facts and legal analysis accurately and completely
- Discloses adverse authority that directly impacts the legal issue
- Avoids omitting or mischaracterizing relevant information
- Maintains professional integrity by providing honest and thorough legal advice
Revision and editing process
Clarity and conciseness
- Eliminates unnecessary words and redundant phrases
- Ensures logical flow and coherence between sections
- Uses clear topic sentences and transitions to guide readers
- Avoids legalese and overly complex sentence structures
Citation accuracy
- Double-checks all citations for correctness and completeness
- Ensures consistent citation format throughout the memorandum
- Verifies that cited sources support the propositions they are used for
- Updates citations to reflect the most current legal authorities
Proofreading techniques
- Reads the memorandum aloud to catch awkward phrasing or errors
- Uses spell-check and grammar-check tools as a first line of defense
- Reviews for consistency in terminology, formatting, and style
- Considers having a colleague review the memorandum for fresh perspective
Memoranda in practice
Associate-partner communication
- Serves as a key tool for junior lawyers to demonstrate their legal analysis skills
- Allows partners to efficiently review and evaluate complex legal issues
- Facilitates knowledge transfer and mentoring within law firms
- May form the basis for client advice or litigation strategy
Client counseling applications
- Provides a foundation for advising clients on legal risks and options
- Helps translate complex legal concepts into actionable recommendations
- Supports informed decision-making by clients in various legal contexts
- May be adapted or summarized for direct client communication, considering the client's level of legal sophistication
Key Terms to Review (33)
ALWD Citation: ALWD Citation refers to the standardized format for citing legal documents and sources in legal writing as set forth by the Association of Legal Writing Directors. This citation style is designed to ensure clarity, uniformity, and consistency across legal documents, making it easier for readers to locate and verify sources. The ALWD Citation Manual provides detailed rules and examples for citing cases, statutes, regulations, and secondary sources, making it an essential tool in legal writing.
Analogical Reasoning: Analogical reasoning is a method of thinking that involves drawing comparisons between similar cases to infer conclusions or make decisions. This approach is crucial in the legal field, as it helps attorneys and judges relate new cases to existing precedents, allowing for a deeper understanding of how laws should apply in various situations. By identifying similarities and differences, legal professionals can argue their points more effectively and ensure consistent application of the law.
Analysis: Analysis is the process of breaking down complex information into its constituent parts to better understand, interpret, and evaluate the underlying issues or principles. This critical thinking skill is essential in legal contexts where facts, laws, and arguments must be examined for clarity and relevance. It aids in assessing the weight of evidence and the strength of legal arguments, which is particularly vital when using secondary sources or drafting memoranda.
Bluebook citation: A bluebook citation is a standardized method of referencing legal documents, cases, statutes, and other sources in legal writing, following the rules set forth in 'The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation.' This citation style is essential for ensuring clarity and consistency in legal documents, making it easier for readers to locate and verify the sources used. Mastering bluebook citation is crucial in various forms of legal writing, including memos and briefs, where proper attribution to sources enhances the credibility of arguments and analysis.
Case law research: Case law research involves the systematic study of legal decisions made by courts, which serve as authoritative sources for understanding and applying the law. This type of research helps legal professionals analyze past rulings to predict outcomes in similar future cases and is vital for crafting well-informed legal arguments in written documents, such as memorandums.
Cirac Method: The Cirac Method is a structured approach used in legal writing, particularly in drafting legal memoranda. It emphasizes clarity, organization, and thorough analysis, ensuring that the writer effectively communicates legal arguments and conclusions to the reader.
Client: A client is an individual or entity that seeks legal advice or representation from a lawyer or law firm. In the context of legal services, the relationship between the client and the attorney is crucial, as it is built on trust, confidentiality, and the duty of the attorney to act in the best interests of the client. Understanding this relationship is essential for effective communication and representation in legal matters.
Client audience: The client audience refers to the specific group of individuals or entities for whom a legal memorandum is being prepared. Understanding the client audience is crucial, as it shapes the tone, content, and structure of the memorandum to ensure that it effectively communicates legal analysis and recommendations in a way that resonates with the audience's needs and expectations.
Client memorandum: A client memorandum is a written document prepared by legal professionals to communicate important information, analysis, and advice regarding legal matters to their clients. This type of memorandum is essential for outlining legal issues, providing guidance, and documenting communications between the attorney and the client, ensuring clarity and understanding in legal representation.
Conclusion: In legal writing, a conclusion is the final section of a memorandum that summarizes the analysis and presents a clear answer or recommendation based on the issues discussed. It synthesizes the legal reasoning, drawing together the key points made throughout the document and providing a definitive resolution to the questions posed.
Counterargument: A counterargument is an argument that opposes or disagrees with a particular claim or position. It serves as a critical component in persuasive writing and legal analysis, as it demonstrates an understanding of multiple perspectives and strengthens the original argument by addressing potential objections.
Dicta: Dicta refers to statements or observations made by a judge in a legal opinion that are not essential to the decision in the case. These comments can provide insight into the court's reasoning but do not hold binding authority as precedent. Understanding dicta is crucial, as it can influence future cases and legal arguments, even though it is not part of the core ruling.
Font size: Font size refers to the measurement of the height of characters in a typeface, typically expressed in points (pt). In the context of writing legal memoranda, font size plays a crucial role in ensuring readability and adhering to formatting guidelines, which can vary depending on the intended audience or court requirements. The choice of font size affects not only the visual appeal of the document but also its professionalism and accessibility.
Heading format: Heading format refers to the structured way in which headings and subheadings are organized in written documents, particularly in legal memoranda. This format helps to create a clear hierarchy of information, making it easier for the reader to navigate through the document and understand the key points being presented. Proper heading format enhances readability and facilitates the logical flow of ideas, which is crucial in legal writing.
Holding: In legal terms, a holding refers to the court's determination of a matter of law in a judicial decision. It is the key part of a court ruling that establishes a legal precedent and dictates how the law should be applied in future cases. The holding is crucial because it provides clarity and direction on specific legal issues, which can significantly influence the interpretation of statutes and legal principles in subsequent litigation.
Interoffice Memorandum: An interoffice memorandum is a written document used for communication within an organization, typically among employees or departments. It serves to convey information, instructions, or updates in a concise and formal manner, fostering clarity and efficiency in internal communication.
Interoffice memorandum: An interoffice memorandum is a written document used for communication within an organization, often between departments or employees. This type of memo is typically concise and focused on specific issues, providing essential information while maintaining a formal tone. It serves to facilitate clear communication, document important decisions, and ensure that all relevant parties are informed.
IRAC Method: The IRAC method is a framework used for legal analysis that stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. It helps structure legal arguments and reasoning by breaking down complex legal issues into manageable components, making it essential for effective communication in various legal contexts such as research, writing, and case analysis.
Issue Statement: An issue statement is a clear and concise declaration of the legal question or problem that needs to be addressed in a legal analysis. It focuses on the specific point of law or fact that is in dispute, guiding the analysis and framing the discussion in legal writing.
Judge: A judge is a public official authorized to decide legal cases and oversee the judicial process in a court of law. Judges interpret the law, assess evidence, and determine the outcome of cases, playing a critical role in ensuring justice is served. They have the authority to make rulings, issue orders, and impose sentences within the legal framework.
Judicial audience: Judicial audience refers to the specific group of individuals, typically judges or court officials, who are the intended recipients of legal communications, such as written documents or oral arguments. Understanding the judicial audience is crucial as it influences the style, tone, and content of legal writing, ensuring that the arguments presented are appropriate and persuasive for those who will ultimately make decisions in a case.
Legal Analysis: Legal analysis is the process of examining legal issues, applying laws and legal principles to specific situations, and determining the implications of legal decisions. This skill is essential for drafting legal documents, such as memoranda, and requires critical thinking, attention to detail, and the ability to articulate legal reasoning clearly and effectively.
Legal Opinion Memorandum: A legal opinion memorandum is a formal document that provides a comprehensive analysis of a legal issue, offering conclusions based on relevant law and facts. It serves as a tool for attorneys to communicate their legal reasoning and recommendations to clients or colleagues, outlining the application of law to specific circumstances. This type of memorandum is essential for ensuring clarity and understanding in legal decision-making processes.
Objective writing: Objective writing is a style of writing that presents information in a neutral, unbiased manner, focusing on facts rather than personal feelings or opinions. This approach is crucial in legal writing as it maintains professionalism and clarity, ensuring that the reader can rely on the presented information without being influenced by the author's subjective views.
Persuasive writing: Persuasive writing is a form of writing that aims to convince the reader to adopt a particular point of view or take a specific action. This type of writing employs arguments, emotional appeals, and logical reasoning to influence the audience, making it essential in legal contexts where convincing a judge or jury can determine the outcome of a case.
Proofreading: Proofreading is the process of reviewing and checking written material for errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting before it is finalized. This step is crucial to ensure that documents, such as memorandums, convey information clearly and professionally, as mistakes can undermine credibility and mislead the reader. Effective proofreading enhances the overall quality of the writing and improves communication.
Redlining: Redlining is a discriminatory practice that involves refusing loans, insurance, or other services to residents of certain areas based on their racial or ethnic composition. This practice has contributed to systemic racism and economic disparities, impacting housing, wealth accumulation, and community development in the United States.
Rule analysis: Rule analysis is a method used in legal writing to interpret and apply legal rules to specific cases or situations. It involves breaking down the rule into its components, examining relevant facts, and determining how the rule applies in context. This process helps to clarify the meaning of legal principles and ensures that they are used correctly in legal memoranda.
Rule of Law: The rule of law is a fundamental principle that asserts that every individual and institution is accountable to the law, which is fairly applied and enforced. This concept ensures that laws govern a nation, not arbitrary decisions by individual government officials, thereby promoting justice and equality. It plays a crucial role in maintaining order, protecting rights, and ensuring that legal processes are transparent and accessible.
Statutory Interpretation: Statutory interpretation is the process by which courts and legal professionals analyze and apply legislation to specific cases. This practice involves understanding the language, context, and intent of statutes to resolve ambiguities or uncertainties. The importance of statutory interpretation lies in its ability to provide clarity and guidance on how laws should be enforced, often impacting legal writing, the application of the plain meaning rule, and the understanding of regulations and agency interpretations.
Statutory research: Statutory research refers to the process of locating and analyzing statutes, which are laws enacted by legislative bodies at the federal or state level. This type of research is crucial for understanding legal frameworks and how they apply to specific cases or issues, enabling legal professionals to provide informed advice or arguments based on statutory provisions.
Supervisor: A supervisor is an individual in a position of authority who oversees the work and performance of others within an organization or team. They play a critical role in ensuring that tasks are completed effectively, guiding employees, and providing feedback to enhance productivity and performance. The relationship between a supervisor and their subordinates is essential for fostering a positive work environment and achieving organizational goals.
Thesis statement: A thesis statement is a concise summary of the main point or claim of a piece of writing, specifically laying out the writer's stance and the arguments that will support it. It serves as a roadmap for the reader, guiding them through the content and helping to establish the direction and purpose of the document. In legal writing, a strong thesis statement is crucial for clarity and persuasiveness, setting the tone for effective communication.