10.2 Attorney-client privilege

Attorney-client privilege is a cornerstone of the legal system, protecting confidential communications between lawyers and clients. This privilege encourages open dialogue, allowing clients to share sensitive information without fear of disclosure, ultimately supporting effective legal representation.

The scope of attorney-client privilege extends to various forms of communication, including verbal conversations and written documents. To maintain this privilege, specific elements must be met, such as the existence of an attorney-client relationship and the intention of seeking or providing legal advice.

Definition of attorney-client privilege

• Fundamental legal concept in United States law protects confidential communications between attorneys and their clients
• Cornerstone of effective legal representation ensures clients can speak freely with their lawyers without fear of disclosure
• Balances the need for confidentiality in legal matters with the broader interests of justice and truth-seeking in the legal system

Scope of protection

Top images from around the web for Scope of protection

• 

  Privileged Communication - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Privileged Communication - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Scope of protection

• 

  Privileged Communication - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Legal image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Privileged Communication - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Attorney Client Privilege - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Covers all forms of communication between attorney and client related to legal advice or representation
• Extends to verbal conversations, written documents, emails, and other electronic communications
• Applies to both in-person meetings and remote consultations (phone calls, video conferences)
• Protects information shared by the client as well as the attorney's advice and legal strategies

Elements of privilege

• Attorney-client relationship must exist or be in the process of forming
• Communication must be made in confidence without the presence of third parties
• Purpose of the communication must be to seek or provide legal advice
• Client must not have waived the privilege through disclosure or consent
• Privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney, and can only be waived by the client

Purpose and rationale

• Encourages full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients
• Promotes effective legal representation by allowing clients to disclose all relevant information
• Supports the adversarial system of justice by protecting the attorney's ability to prepare and present the client's case
• Enhances public trust in the legal system and the administration of justice

Establishing attorney-client relationship

Express vs implied agreements

• Express agreements formed through formal engagement letters or contracts
• Implied agreements arise from conduct and circumstances (client seeking advice, attorney providing it)
• Courts may consider factors such as payment of fees, nature of discussions, and reasonable expectations of the parties
• Express agreements provide clearer protection and are generally preferred for establishing privilege

Prospective clients

• Initial consultations with potential clients may be protected even if formal representation doesn't occur
• Courts often apply a "reasonable belief" standard from the prospective client's perspective
• Attorneys should clearly communicate the limits of confidentiality during initial consultations
• Screening procedures help prevent conflicts of interest with existing or future clients

Corporate clients

• Privilege extends to communications between corporate employees and company attorneys
• "Control group" test limits privilege to senior management in some jurisdictions
• "Subject matter" test protects communications related to employee's corporate duties
• Upjohn warning clarifies that corporate counsel represents the company, not individual employees

Types of protected communications

Verbal vs written communications

• Verbal communications include in-person conversations, phone calls, and video conferences
• Written communications encompass letters, memos, emails, and text messages
• Both forms equally protected if they meet the elements of privilege
• Documentation of verbal communications (notes, summaries) may also be privileged
• Written communications often provide clearer evidence of privilege in case of disputes

Electronic communications

• Emails, instant messages, and other digital communications covered by privilege
• Increased risk of inadvertent disclosure due to ease of forwarding or misaddressing
• Metadata in electronic documents may contain privileged information
• Use of secure client portals and encrypted communication tools enhances protection
• Caution required when using personal devices or public networks for client communications

Confidential information requirements

• Communication must be made with the expectation of privacy
• Presence of third parties generally destroys confidentiality (exceptions for agents, interpreters)
• Physical settings (private offices, conference rooms) should ensure privacy
• Labeling documents as "Privileged and Confidential" helps but doesn't guarantee protection
• Clients should be advised on maintaining confidentiality in their own communications

Exceptions to attorney-client privilege

Crime-fraud exception

• Privilege does not protect communications made to further a crime or fraud
• Applies to both ongoing and future criminal or fraudulent conduct
• Mere suspicion of wrongdoing insufficient; prima facie evidence required
• Attorney need not be aware of the client's criminal or fraudulent intent
• Courts may conduct in camera review to determine if exception applies

Fiduciary exception

• Applies in cases where attorney represents a fiduciary (trustee, corporate officer)
• Beneficiaries may have right to access communications related to fiduciary duties
• Based on the principle that fiduciary's duty to beneficiaries outweighs privilege
• Does not apply to communications about personal liability or potential claims
• Varies by jurisdiction and specific fiduciary relationship

Waiver of privilege

• Client may expressly or impliedly waive privilege through voluntary disclosure
• Partial disclosure of privileged information may waive privilege for related communications
• Death of the client generally does not terminate privilege; executor may assert or waive
• Exceptions exist for disputes between heirs or when client's intentions are at issue
• Courts may find waiver if privilege is used as both a "sword and shield" in litigation

Waiver of attorney-client privilege

Express vs implied waiver

• Express waiver occurs through clear, intentional disclosure or consent by the client
• Implied waiver results from actions inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality
• Putting privileged communications "at issue" in litigation may constitute implied waiver
• Selective disclosure to government agencies may waive privilege in some jurisdictions
• Courts consider fairness and prejudice to opposing parties when determining implied waiver

Inadvertent disclosure

• Accidental release of privileged information (misdirected emails, document production errors)
• Federal Rule of Evidence 502 provides some protection against waiver in federal proceedings
• Prompt action to rectify disclosure and reasonable precautions are factors in preserving privilege
• Clawback agreements and court orders can help mitigate risks of inadvertent disclosure
• Ethical obligations require notifying opposing counsel of inadvertently received privileged materials

Selective waiver doctrine

• Allows disclosure to government agencies without waiving privilege as to other parties
• Not universally recognized; circuit split on its application
• Intended to encourage cooperation in government investigations
• Critics argue it unfairly advantages the government over private litigants
• Some courts allow selective waiver if supported by confidentiality agreement

Attorney-client privilege in specific contexts

Corporate settings

• Applies to in-house counsel when providing legal advice (not business advice)
• Upjohn Co. v. United States expanded protection beyond control group
• Internal investigations may be privileged if conducted for legal purposes
• Challenges in distinguishing between legal and business communications
• Board of directors communications with counsel generally protected

Government investigations

• Privilege applies to government attorneys advising agencies
• Complexities arise due to public interest and transparency concerns
• Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemptions protect some privileged communications
• Government attorneys must balance confidentiality with public disclosure obligations
• Special considerations for legislative investigations and executive privilege claims

Joint defense agreements

• Allow multiple parties with common interests to share privileged information
• Extends privilege to communications between counsel for different clients
• Must be carefully drafted to define scope and avoid conflicts of interest
• Does not create attorney-client relationship between counsel and other parties
• Withdrawal from agreement may limit future use of shared information

Ethical considerations

Duty of confidentiality

• Broader than attorney-client privilege; covers all information related to representation
• Ethical obligation continues even after termination of attorney-client relationship
• Limited exceptions for preventing death or substantial bodily harm
• Confidentiality duties extend to prospective clients and consultations
• Attorneys must train staff and implement safeguards to protect client information

Conflicts of interest

• Privilege issues arise when attorney represents multiple clients with divergent interests
• Joint representation requires clear disclosure and informed consent from all clients
• Conflicts may necessitate withdrawal from representation of one or all clients
• Screening procedures necessary to prevent imputed conflicts within law firms
• Ethical rules govern use of confidential information in subsequent representations

Reporting requirements

• Mandatory reporting laws may conflict with privilege (child abuse, financial crimes)
• Some jurisdictions allow or require disclosure to prevent client's criminal acts
• ABA Model Rules permit disclosure to prevent substantial financial harm in some cases
• Attorneys must navigate complex ethical landscape when facing reporting dilemmas
• Clear communication with clients about limits of confidentiality is essential

Challenges to attorney-client privilege

In-house counsel issues

• Dual role as legal advisor and business executive complicates privilege claims
• Courts scrutinize communications to determine primary purpose (legal vs business advice)
• International variations in recognition of privilege for in-house counsel
• Corporate structure and reporting relationships impact privilege analysis
• Best practices include clearly separating legal and business functions

Multi-jurisdictional practice

• Privilege rules vary across state and national borders
• Choice of law issues arise in cross-border transactions and litigation
• Some countries do not recognize privilege for in-house counsel or foreign attorneys
• EU regulations provide different standards for competition law investigations
• Attorneys must be aware of local privilege rules when practicing in multiple jurisdictions

Third-party presence

• Generally destroys privilege unless third party is necessary for legal representation
• Exceptions may apply for interpreters, expert consultants, or client's family members
• Caution required when including non-legal professionals in communications
• Kovel doctrine extends privilege to some communications with accountants and other experts
• Privilege may be maintained if third party is agent of attorney or client

Preserving attorney-client privilege

Best practices for attorneys

• Clearly establish attorney-client relationship through engagement letters
• Label privileged communications and documents appropriately
• Limit distribution of privileged information on a need-to-know basis
• Implement secure communication systems and data storage
• Conduct regular training for attorneys and staff on privilege issues
• Develop protocols for responding to inadvertent disclosures

Client education

• Explain scope and limitations of privilege at outset of representation
• Advise clients on maintaining confidentiality in their own communications
• Caution against discussing legal matters with third parties or on social media
• Provide guidance on proper use of email and electronic communications
• Inform clients about potential waiver situations and exceptions to privilege

Document management strategies

• Implement robust document retention and destruction policies
• Use privilege logs to track and justify privilege claims in discovery
• Employ technology-assisted review to identify potentially privileged documents
• Establish procedures for reviewing and redacting privileged information
• Consider separate storage systems for privileged and non-privileged materials

Attorney-client privilege vs work product doctrine

Similarities and differences

• Both protect confidential legal information but serve different purposes
• Attorney-client privilege covers communications; work product protects attorney's mental impressions
• Work product doctrine broader in some respects (covers materials prepared by non-attorneys)
• Different standards for waiver and exceptions apply to each doctrine
• Work product may be discoverable upon showing of substantial need and undue hardship

Applicability in litigation

• Attorney-client privilege absolute if established; work product has qualified protection
• Work product doctrine particularly relevant in discovery and pretrial preparation
• Courts balance need for truth-seeking with protection of adversarial system
• Timing of creation of materials critical for work product claims (in anticipation of litigation)
• Expert witness materials subject to complex rules under both doctrines

Scope of protection

• Attorney-client privilege narrower but stronger protection
• Work product doctrine covers broader range of materials (notes, memoranda, witness statements)
• Opinion work product (attorney's mental impressions) receives highest level of protection
• Factual work product may be discoverable under certain circumstances
• Both doctrines aim to promote thorough case preparation and effective representation