🤕Torts
Negligence per se simplifies proving negligence by using statutory violations as automatic proof of breach. This approach differs from ordinary negligence, which requires case-by-case evaluation of conduct against a reasonable person standard.
To establish negligence per se, plaintiffs must show the defendant violated a safety statute designed to prevent their type of harm. Defenses include excused violations, contributory negligence, and assumption of risk, depending on jurisdiction and circumstances.
Assumption of risk is a legal doctrine that asserts a person can be held responsible for the injuries they incur while voluntarily engaging in an activity that involves known risks. This concept is significant because it relates to how individuals may agree to take on certain dangers, potentially limiting the liability of others involved in those activities.
Term 1 of 19
Assumption of risk is a legal doctrine that asserts a person can be held responsible for the injuries they incur while voluntarily engaging in an activity that involves known risks. This concept is significant because it relates to how individuals may agree to take on certain dangers, potentially limiting the liability of others involved in those activities.
Term 1 of 19
The reasonable person standard is a legal standard used to determine if an individual's actions can be considered negligent by comparing them to what a typical, rational person would do in similar circumstances. This standard helps assess duty of care and is fundamental in various areas of tort law.
Negligence: A failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances, resulting in harm to another party.
Duty of Care: The legal obligation of an individual to act with the care that a reasonably careful person would use under similar circumstances to prevent harm to others.
Breach of Duty: The failure to meet the standard of care established by the reasonable person standard, which can lead to liability for negligence.
Assumption of risk is a legal doctrine that asserts a person can be held responsible for the injuries they incur while voluntarily engaging in an activity that involves known risks. This concept is significant because it relates to how individuals may agree to take on certain dangers, potentially limiting the liability of others involved in those activities.
Informed Consent: A process by which a patient or participant is made aware of the potential risks and benefits of a procedure or activity, allowing them to make an educated decision about their participation.
Negligence: A failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances, which can lead to liability for any resulting injuries.
Comparative Negligence: A legal doctrine that compares the fault of both parties involved in an accident or injury, determining the extent to which each party is liable for damages.
Breach of duty occurs when an individual fails to meet the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances, resulting in potential harm to others. This concept is crucial in understanding negligence, as it establishes whether a party has acted unreasonably or failed to uphold their responsibilities, which can lead to liability in various scenarios.
Negligence: A legal concept where a person fails to act with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised, leading to harm or injury.
Standard of Care: The degree of caution or concern an ordinary person should exercise in a given situation; it serves as a benchmark for determining breach of duty.
Duty of Care: A legal obligation requiring individuals to adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others.
Duty refers to the legal obligation of an individual to adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing acts that could foreseeably harm others. It establishes the foundation for negligence claims, as individuals are expected to act in a way that does not put others at unnecessary risk. Understanding duty is crucial in assessing whether a defendant's actions fall short of this expected standard.
Breach of Duty: Breach of duty occurs when an individual fails to meet the standard of care required by law, leading to potential liability for negligence.
Foreseeability: Foreseeability is the ability to anticipate potential harm or risks that could arise from one’s actions, playing a key role in determining whether a duty exists.
Reasonable Person Standard: The reasonable person standard is a legal benchmark used to determine how an average person would responsibly act in a similar situation, helping to evaluate whether a duty was breached.
Proximate cause, also known as legal cause, refers to the primary cause that is legally sufficient to hold a party liable for damages resulting from their actions. It connects the defendant's conduct with the harm suffered by the plaintiff and establishes whether the harm was a foreseeable result of that conduct.
Actual Cause: Also called cause-in-fact, this refers to the actual, factual link between a defendant's actions and the injury suffered by the plaintiff, showing that the injury would not have occurred 'but for' those actions.
Negligence: A failure to exercise reasonable care that results in harm or injury to another person, which can lead to liability if proximate cause can be established.
Intervening Cause: An event that occurs after a defendant's negligent act and contributes to the injury, which can affect the determination of proximate cause if it is deemed a superseding factor.
Building codes are sets of regulations that govern the design, construction, alteration, and maintenance of buildings to ensure safety, health, and welfare for the public. They establish minimum standards for structural integrity, fire safety, accessibility, and environmental impact, thereby playing a crucial role in reducing risks associated with building-related hazards.
zoning laws: Zoning laws are regulations that dictate how land can be used in specific areas, including restrictions on the type of buildings allowed and their purposes.
inspections: Inspections are evaluations conducted by officials to ensure that construction projects comply with building codes and other regulations throughout the building process.
permit: A permit is an official authorization granted by a governing body that allows construction or alteration work to proceed according to local building codes.
A statutory violation occurs when an individual or entity fails to comply with a specific law or statute established by legislative authority. This violation can be significant in legal cases as it often serves as a basis for establishing negligence per se, where the breach of the law automatically constitutes negligence, simplifying the plaintiff's burden of proof in tort actions.
Negligence Per Se: A legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff to prove negligence by showing that the defendant violated a statute designed to protect a specific class of individuals.
Duty of Care: The legal obligation that requires individuals to act with reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others.
Civil Liability: The responsibility of an individual or entity to compensate another party for harm caused through negligent or wrongful actions.