Fiveable

🥵Thermodynamics Unit 9 Review

QR code for Thermodynamics practice questions

9.3 Clausius-Clapeyron equation

9.3 Clausius-Clapeyron equation

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
🥵Thermodynamics
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The Clausius-Clapeyron equation connects vapor pressure to temperature along a phase boundary. It lets you predict how vapor pressure changes with temperature and calculate enthalpies of vaporization or sublimation from pressure-temperature data. The derivation flows directly from the condition of phase equilibrium and the definition of chemical potential.

Derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The derivation starts from the fact that, at phase equilibrium, the chemical potential must be equal in both phases. Here's how it builds, step by step:

  1. Start with the differential of chemical potential for a pure substance: dμ=sdT+vdPd\mu = -s\,dT + v\,dP

  2. Set the two phases equal. At equilibrium between liquid and vapor, μl=μv\mu_l = \mu_v, so any infinitesimal change along the coexistence curve must satisfy: dμl=dμvd\mu_l = d\mu_v

  3. Substitute the chemical potential expression for each phase: sldT+vldP=svdT+vvdP-s_l\,dT + v_l\,dP = -s_v\,dT + v_v\,dP

  4. Rearrange to isolate dP/dTdP/dT: dPdT=svslvvvl=ΔsΔv\frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{s_v - s_l}{v_v - v_l} = \frac{\Delta s}{\Delta v}

    This is the Clapeyron equation in its exact form. It applies to any phase transition with no approximations.

  5. Relate the entropy change to latent heat. During a reversible phase transition at constant TT and PP: Δs=svsl=LT\Delta s = s_v - s_l = \frac{L}{T}

where LL is the molar latent heat (enthalpy of vaporization or sublimation).

  1. Apply two approximations to get the Clausius-Clapeyron form:

    • The molar volume of vapor is much larger than that of the condensed phase: vvvlv_v \gg v_l, so Δvvv\Delta v \approx v_v
    • The vapor behaves as an ideal gas: vv=RT/Pv_v = RT/P
  2. Substitute into the Clapeyron equation: dPdT=LPRT2\frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{LP}{RT^2}

  3. Separate variables to get the standard differential form: dPP=LRT2dT\frac{dP}{P} = \frac{L}{RT^2}\,dT

    Or equivalently: d(lnP)dT=LRT2\frac{d(\ln P)}{dT} = \frac{L}{RT^2}

Notice the distinction: the Clapeyron equation (step 4) is exact, while the Clausius-Clapeyron equation (step 8) relies on the ideal gas and negligible liquid volume approximations.

Derivation of Clausius-Clapeyron equation, Evaporación - Ciclo hidrológico (del agua)

Vapor Pressure Calculations

To find the vapor pressure at a new temperature, you integrate the Clausius-Clapeyron equation assuming LL is approximately constant over the temperature range:

  1. Integrate both sides between states 1 and 2: P1P2dPP=LRT1T2dTT2\int_{P_1}^{P_2} \frac{dP}{P} = \frac{L}{R} \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{dT}{T^2}

  2. Evaluate the integrals: lnP2P1=LR(1T21T1)\ln\frac{P_2}{P_1} = -\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

  3. Solve for P2P_2: P2=P1exp[LR(1T21T1)]P_2 = P_1 \exp\left[-\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)\right]

To use this, you need one known vapor pressure P1P_1 at temperature T1T_1, plus the latent heat LL. Common reference points include water's normal boiling point (P=1atmP = 1\,\text{atm} at T=373KT = 373\,\text{K}, Lvap40.7kJ/molL_{vap} \approx 40.7\,\text{kJ/mol}) or ethanol's (P=1atmP = 1\,\text{atm} at T=351.5KT = 351.5\,\text{K}).

Useful rearrangement: The integrated equation says that a plot of lnP\ln P vs. 1/T1/T should give a straight line with slope L/R-L/R. This is how vapor pressure data is commonly graphed and analyzed.

Derivation of Clausius-Clapeyron equation, Phase transitions – TikZ.net

Enthalpy Determination from Clausius-Clapeyron

You can run the calculation in reverse: if you have vapor pressure measurements at two temperatures, you can extract the latent heat.

  1. Start from the integrated form: lnP2P1=LR(1T21T1)\ln\frac{P_2}{P_1} = -\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

  2. Solve for LL: L=Rln(P2/P1)1/T21/T1L = -R\,\frac{\ln(P_2/P_1)}{1/T_2 - 1/T_1}

  3. Plug in your measured (T1,P1)(T_1, P_1) and (T2,P2)(T_2, P_2) values.

The result gives you LvapL_{vap} if you're looking at a liquid-vapor boundary, or LsubL_{sub} if you're looking at a solid-vapor boundary (as with CO2\text{CO}_2 below its triple point).

For better accuracy, you can measure PP at several temperatures, plot lnP\ln P vs. 1/T1/T, and determine LL from the slope of the best-fit line rather than relying on just two data points.

Limitations of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The equation works well for pure substances at moderate conditions, but each approximation introduces limits:

  • Constant LL assumption. Latent heat actually varies with temperature. For water, LvapL_{vap} drops from about 45 kJ/mol near 0°C to about 40.7 kJ/mol at 100°C. Over narrow temperature ranges this doesn't matter much, but over wide ranges it introduces error.
  • Negligible condensed-phase volume. The assumption vvvlv_v \gg v_l breaks down at high pressures and especially near the critical point, where the liquid and vapor densities converge and Δv0\Delta v \to 0.
  • Ideal gas behavior. Real vapors deviate from Pv=RTPv = RT at high pressures or when strong intermolecular forces are present (e.g., hydrogen bonding in water vapor). At those conditions, you'd need a more realistic equation of state.
  • Pure substances only. The equation doesn't account for the effect of dissolved solutes on vapor pressure. For solutions, you need modifications like Raoult's law (for ideal solutions) or activity-based corrections.

In short, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation is most reliable for pure substances, at low to moderate pressures, well below the critical point, and over temperature ranges narrow enough that LL doesn't change much.

2,589 studying →