Clausius-Clapeyron Equation
The Clausius-Clapeyron equation connects vapor pressure to temperature along a phase boundary. It lets you predict how vapor pressure changes with temperature and calculate enthalpies of vaporization or sublimation from pressure-temperature data. The derivation flows directly from the condition of phase equilibrium and the definition of chemical potential.
Derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation
The derivation starts from the fact that, at phase equilibrium, the chemical potential must be equal in both phases. Here's how it builds, step by step:
-
Start with the differential of chemical potential for a pure substance:
-
Set the two phases equal. At equilibrium between liquid and vapor, , so any infinitesimal change along the coexistence curve must satisfy:
-
Substitute the chemical potential expression for each phase:
-
Rearrange to isolate :
This is the Clapeyron equation in its exact form. It applies to any phase transition with no approximations.
-
Relate the entropy change to latent heat. During a reversible phase transition at constant and :
where is the molar latent heat (enthalpy of vaporization or sublimation).
-
Apply two approximations to get the Clausius-Clapeyron form:
- The molar volume of vapor is much larger than that of the condensed phase: , so
- The vapor behaves as an ideal gas:
-
Substitute into the Clapeyron equation:
-
Separate variables to get the standard differential form:
Or equivalently:
Notice the distinction: the Clapeyron equation (step 4) is exact, while the Clausius-Clapeyron equation (step 8) relies on the ideal gas and negligible liquid volume approximations.

Vapor Pressure Calculations
To find the vapor pressure at a new temperature, you integrate the Clausius-Clapeyron equation assuming is approximately constant over the temperature range:
-
Integrate both sides between states 1 and 2:
-
Evaluate the integrals:
-
Solve for :
To use this, you need one known vapor pressure at temperature , plus the latent heat . Common reference points include water's normal boiling point ( at , ) or ethanol's ( at ).
Useful rearrangement: The integrated equation says that a plot of vs. should give a straight line with slope . This is how vapor pressure data is commonly graphed and analyzed.

Enthalpy Determination from Clausius-Clapeyron
You can run the calculation in reverse: if you have vapor pressure measurements at two temperatures, you can extract the latent heat.
-
Start from the integrated form:
-
Solve for :
-
Plug in your measured and values.
The result gives you if you're looking at a liquid-vapor boundary, or if you're looking at a solid-vapor boundary (as with below its triple point).
For better accuracy, you can measure at several temperatures, plot vs. , and determine from the slope of the best-fit line rather than relying on just two data points.
Limitations of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation
The equation works well for pure substances at moderate conditions, but each approximation introduces limits:
- Constant assumption. Latent heat actually varies with temperature. For water, drops from about 45 kJ/mol near 0ยฐC to about 40.7 kJ/mol at 100ยฐC. Over narrow temperature ranges this doesn't matter much, but over wide ranges it introduces error.
- Negligible condensed-phase volume. The assumption breaks down at high pressures and especially near the critical point, where the liquid and vapor densities converge and .
- Ideal gas behavior. Real vapors deviate from at high pressures or when strong intermolecular forces are present (e.g., hydrogen bonding in water vapor). At those conditions, you'd need a more realistic equation of state.
- Pure substances only. The equation doesn't account for the effect of dissolved solutes on vapor pressure. For solutions, you need modifications like Raoult's law (for ideal solutions) or activity-based corrections.
In short, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation is most reliable for pure substances, at low to moderate pressures, well below the critical point, and over temperature ranges narrow enough that doesn't change much.