Fiveable

๐ŸฅตThermodynamics Unit 9 Review

QR code for Thermodynamics practice questions

9.3 Clausius-Clapeyron equation

9.3 Clausius-Clapeyron equation

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated August 2025
๐ŸฅตThermodynamics
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The Clausius-Clapeyron equation connects vapor pressure to temperature along a phase boundary. It lets you predict how vapor pressure changes with temperature and calculate enthalpies of vaporization or sublimation from pressure-temperature data. The derivation flows directly from the condition of phase equilibrium and the definition of chemical potential.

Derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The derivation starts from the fact that, at phase equilibrium, the chemical potential must be equal in both phases. Here's how it builds, step by step:

  1. Start with the differential of chemical potential for a pure substance: dฮผ=โˆ’sโ€‰dT+vโ€‰dPd\mu = -s\,dT + v\,dP

  2. Set the two phases equal. At equilibrium between liquid and vapor, ฮผl=ฮผv\mu_l = \mu_v, so any infinitesimal change along the coexistence curve must satisfy: dฮผl=dฮผvd\mu_l = d\mu_v

  3. Substitute the chemical potential expression for each phase: โˆ’slโ€‰dT+vlโ€‰dP=โˆ’svโ€‰dT+vvโ€‰dP-s_l\,dT + v_l\,dP = -s_v\,dT + v_v\,dP

  4. Rearrange to isolate dP/dTdP/dT: dPdT=svโˆ’slvvโˆ’vl=ฮ”sฮ”v\frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{s_v - s_l}{v_v - v_l} = \frac{\Delta s}{\Delta v}

    This is the Clapeyron equation in its exact form. It applies to any phase transition with no approximations.

  5. Relate the entropy change to latent heat. During a reversible phase transition at constant TT and PP: ฮ”s=svโˆ’sl=LT\Delta s = s_v - s_l = \frac{L}{T}

where LL is the molar latent heat (enthalpy of vaporization or sublimation).

  1. Apply two approximations to get the Clausius-Clapeyron form:

    • The molar volume of vapor is much larger than that of the condensed phase: vvโ‰ซvlv_v \gg v_l, so ฮ”vโ‰ˆvv\Delta v \approx v_v
    • The vapor behaves as an ideal gas: vv=RT/Pv_v = RT/P
  2. Substitute into the Clapeyron equation: dPdT=LPRT2\frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{LP}{RT^2}

  3. Separate variables to get the standard differential form: dPP=LRT2โ€‰dT\frac{dP}{P} = \frac{L}{RT^2}\,dT

    Or equivalently: d(lnโกP)dT=LRT2\frac{d(\ln P)}{dT} = \frac{L}{RT^2}

Notice the distinction: the Clapeyron equation (step 4) is exact, while the Clausius-Clapeyron equation (step 8) relies on the ideal gas and negligible liquid volume approximations.

Derivation of Clausius-Clapeyron equation, Evaporaciรณn - Ciclo hidrolรณgico (del agua)

Vapor Pressure Calculations

To find the vapor pressure at a new temperature, you integrate the Clausius-Clapeyron equation assuming LL is approximately constant over the temperature range:

  1. Integrate both sides between states 1 and 2: โˆซP1P2dPP=LRโˆซT1T2dTT2\int_{P_1}^{P_2} \frac{dP}{P} = \frac{L}{R} \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{dT}{T^2}

  2. Evaluate the integrals: lnโกP2P1=โˆ’LR(1T2โˆ’1T1)\ln\frac{P_2}{P_1} = -\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

  3. Solve for P2P_2: P2=P1expโก[โˆ’LR(1T2โˆ’1T1)]P_2 = P_1 \exp\left[-\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)\right]

To use this, you need one known vapor pressure P1P_1 at temperature T1T_1, plus the latent heat LL. Common reference points include water's normal boiling point (P=1โ€‰atmP = 1\,\text{atm} at T=373โ€‰KT = 373\,\text{K}, Lvapโ‰ˆ40.7โ€‰kJ/molL_{vap} \approx 40.7\,\text{kJ/mol}) or ethanol's (P=1โ€‰atmP = 1\,\text{atm} at T=351.5โ€‰KT = 351.5\,\text{K}).

Useful rearrangement: The integrated equation says that a plot of lnโกP\ln P vs. 1/T1/T should give a straight line with slope โˆ’L/R-L/R. This is how vapor pressure data is commonly graphed and analyzed.

Derivation of Clausius-Clapeyron equation, Phase transitions โ€“ TikZ.net

Enthalpy Determination from Clausius-Clapeyron

You can run the calculation in reverse: if you have vapor pressure measurements at two temperatures, you can extract the latent heat.

  1. Start from the integrated form: lnโกP2P1=โˆ’LR(1T2โˆ’1T1)\ln\frac{P_2}{P_1} = -\frac{L}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}\right)

  2. Solve for LL: L=โˆ’Rโ€‰lnโก(P2/P1)1/T2โˆ’1/T1L = -R\,\frac{\ln(P_2/P_1)}{1/T_2 - 1/T_1}

  3. Plug in your measured (T1,P1)(T_1, P_1) and (T2,P2)(T_2, P_2) values.

The result gives you LvapL_{vap} if you're looking at a liquid-vapor boundary, or LsubL_{sub} if you're looking at a solid-vapor boundary (as with CO2\text{CO}_2 below its triple point).

For better accuracy, you can measure PP at several temperatures, plot lnโกP\ln P vs. 1/T1/T, and determine LL from the slope of the best-fit line rather than relying on just two data points.

Limitations of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation

The equation works well for pure substances at moderate conditions, but each approximation introduces limits:

  • Constant LL assumption. Latent heat actually varies with temperature. For water, LvapL_{vap} drops from about 45 kJ/mol near 0ยฐC to about 40.7 kJ/mol at 100ยฐC. Over narrow temperature ranges this doesn't matter much, but over wide ranges it introduces error.
  • Negligible condensed-phase volume. The assumption vvโ‰ซvlv_v \gg v_l breaks down at high pressures and especially near the critical point, where the liquid and vapor densities converge and ฮ”vโ†’0\Delta v \to 0.
  • Ideal gas behavior. Real vapors deviate from Pv=RTPv = RT at high pressures or when strong intermolecular forces are present (e.g., hydrogen bonding in water vapor). At those conditions, you'd need a more realistic equation of state.
  • Pure substances only. The equation doesn't account for the effect of dissolved solutes on vapor pressure. For solutions, you need modifications like Raoult's law (for ideal solutions) or activity-based corrections.

In short, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation is most reliable for pure substances, at low to moderate pressures, well below the critical point, and over temperature ranges narrow enough that LL doesn't change much.