2.2 Behavioral Theories
4 min read•august 15, 2024
Behavioral theories focus on observable leadership actions, not innate traits. They examine how effective leaders balance task-oriented behaviors (like planning and coordinating) with relationship-oriented behaviors (like supporting and developing team members).
Key studies from Iowa, Ohio State, and Michigan universities shaped these theories. The plots based on concern for production and people. Effective leaders adapt their approach to fit the situation and their team's needs.
Principles of Behavioral Leadership Theories
Focus on Observable Behaviors
Top images from around the web for Focus on Observable Behaviors
To Be Productive (aka 2bProductive Blog): The Role of the Leader in Five Team Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
4 Situational Leadership Styles View original
Is this image relevant?
To Be Productive (aka 2bProductive Blog): The Role of the Leader in Five Team Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Focus on Observable Behaviors
To Be Productive (aka 2bProductive Blog): The Role of the Leader in Five Team Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
4 Situational Leadership Styles View original
Is this image relevant?
To Be Productive (aka 2bProductive Blog): The Role of the Leader in Five Team Behaviors View original
Is this image relevant?
Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Behavioral theories emphasize the study of specific, observable behaviors exhibited by leaders
- Assume that leadership capability can be learned and developed, rather than being inherent
- Provide a basis for leadership training by identifying key behavioral patterns that contribute to success (communication skills, delegation)
Identification of Effective Leadership Behaviors
- Aim to differentiate the behaviors of effective leaders from ineffective leaders
- Two major classes of leader behavior: task-oriented behaviors and relationship-oriented behaviors
- Task-oriented behaviors focus on achieving goals, accomplishing tasks, and meeting performance standards (planning, scheduling, coordinating)
- Relationship-oriented behaviors focus on meeting the social-emotional needs of followers and developing positive interpersonal relationships (supporting, developing, recognizing)
Influential Behavioral Leadership Studies
- University of , Ohio State University studies, and University of
- Identified initiation of structure (task-oriented) and (relationship-oriented) as two distinct aspects of leader behavior
- Ohio State University studies used the (LBDQ) to measure leader behaviors
- University of Michigan studies used the terms "" (task-oriented) and "" (relationship-oriented)
Managerial Grid Model
- Plots leadership behaviors on two axes: concern for production and concern for people
- Identifies five key leadership styles based on different combinations of these two dimensions
- Styles include , , , , and
- Suggests that the Team Management style, which demonstrates high concern for both production and people, is the most effective approach
Task vs Relationship Leadership
Task-Oriented Leadership Behaviors
- Focus on achieving goals, accomplishing tasks, and meeting performance standards
- Examples include planning, scheduling, coordinating, and monitoring operations
- Tend to result in higher levels of follower performance, particularly when roles and goals are unclear or when the task is complex or unstructured
- When carried to an extreme, can reduce follower satisfaction and creativity (micromanagement, lack of autonomy)
Relationship-Oriented Leadership Behaviors
- Focus on meeting the social-emotional needs of followers and developing positive interpersonal relationships
- Examples include supporting, developing, recognizing, and consulting with followers
- Tend to result in higher levels of follower satisfaction, organizational commitment, and trust in the leader
- When carried to an extreme, can be seen as permissive and result in lower levels of performance (lack of direction, unclear expectations)
Balancing Task and Relationship Behaviors
- Effective leaders exhibit both task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors, adapting their approach based on the situation and follower needs
- The relative emphasis on each type of behavior may vary depending on factors such as the nature of the task, follower characteristics, and organizational culture
- For example, a leader may prioritize task-oriented behaviors when working on a time-sensitive project with inexperienced team members, while focusing more on relationship-oriented behaviors when developing long-term strategies with a seasoned team
Leadership Impact on Followers
Follower Performance
- Task-oriented behaviors can improve follower performance by providing clear direction, structure, and performance standards
- Relationship-oriented behaviors can enhance follower performance by fostering a supportive and collaborative work environment
- The most effective leaders balance both types of behaviors to optimize follower performance based on the situation and individual needs
Follower Satisfaction and Commitment
- Relationship-oriented behaviors tend to increase follower satisfaction, organizational commitment, and trust in the leader by addressing social-emotional needs and promoting positive interpersonal relationships
- Task-oriented behaviors, when carried to an extreme, can reduce follower satisfaction and creativity by limiting autonomy and focusing solely on performance outcomes
- Leaders who demonstrate genuine concern for their followers' well-being and development are more likely to foster a highly satisfied and committed workforce
Situational and Follower Characteristics
- The impact of task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors on follower outcomes can be moderated by situational factors and follower characteristics
- Situational factors may include the nature of the task (routine vs. complex), the organizational culture (hierarchical vs. collaborative), and the external environment (stable vs. dynamic)
- Follower characteristics, such as experience level, desire for autonomy, and individual preferences, can influence the relative effectiveness of different leadership behaviors
- For example, experienced followers with a high need for autonomy may respond better to relationship-oriented behaviors, while novice followers may benefit more from task-oriented behaviors that provide clear guidance and direction
Key Terms to Review (26)
360-degree feedback: 360-degree feedback is a comprehensive performance appraisal method that gathers feedback about an individual from a variety of sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes even customers. This approach provides a well-rounded view of an employee's skills and behaviors, emphasizing the importance of multiple perspectives in understanding performance and development needs.
Active Listening: Active listening is a communication technique that involves fully concentrating, understanding, responding, and remembering what the speaker is saying. This method goes beyond just hearing words; it involves engaging with the speaker to foster understanding and connection, which enhances relationships and improves collaboration.
Authority-compliance management: Authority-compliance management refers to a leadership style focused primarily on achieving organizational goals and ensuring compliance from team members, often at the expense of personal relationships and employee satisfaction. This approach emphasizes efficiency and productivity over the emotional needs of employees, reflecting a more authoritarian view of leadership where directives are issued and obedience is expected. In this context, it showcases the balance between task orientation and people orientation in behavioral theories of leadership.
Behavioral Theory: Behavioral theory is a leadership approach that emphasizes the actions and behaviors of leaders, rather than their traits or characteristics. It focuses on how leaders interact with their teams, including their decision-making styles and communication methods. This theory suggests that effective leadership can be learned and developed through observation and practice, making it highly relevant in understanding different leadership styles such as autocratic leadership, which is characterized by strong control and directive communication.
Consideration: Consideration refers to the extent to which leaders demonstrate concern and care for their team members’ feelings, needs, and well-being. This involves creating supportive relationships that encourage open communication and trust, allowing for a collaborative and positive work environment. Consideration is a key aspect of behavioral theories as it focuses on the interpersonal relationships that leaders build within organizations.
Country club management: Country club management refers to a leadership style that prioritizes the needs and satisfaction of team members over productivity and goal achievement. This approach fosters a friendly and comfortable workplace atmosphere, similar to the relaxed and enjoyable environment of a country club. While it creates strong interpersonal relationships, it can sometimes lead to a lack of focus on organizational objectives.
Employee orientation: Employee orientation is the process of introducing new employees to an organization’s culture, policies, procedures, and their specific job roles. This practice is essential for helping new hires feel welcome, understand their responsibilities, and integrate into the workplace effectively, thereby enhancing employee engagement and retention.
Groupthink: Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon where the desire for harmony and conformity within a group leads to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. It occurs when group members prioritize consensus over critical analysis, often resulting in poor decisions and a lack of creativity. Understanding groupthink is essential for leaders, as it can impact how teams develop, make ethical choices, and handle diversity.
Impoverished Management: Impoverished management is a leadership style characterized by minimal concern for both people and production, often resulting in a lack of direction and low levels of engagement among team members. This style reflects a hands-off approach where leaders avoid taking responsibility and fail to establish clear goals, leading to a disengaged workforce. It is one of the five leadership styles identified in the Managerial Grid, which evaluates leadership based on concern for people versus concern for production.
Initiating structure: Initiating structure refers to the extent to which a leader defines and organizes roles, tasks, and relationships within a group to achieve goals. This concept emphasizes the importance of setting clear expectations and guiding team members in their work, promoting efficiency and productivity. It highlights a leader's focus on task completion while providing direction and support to team members.
Iowa Studies: The Iowa Studies refer to a series of influential research projects conducted in the 1930s at the University of Iowa, focusing on leadership styles and their effects on group dynamics. These studies identified three primary leadership styles: authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire, providing a foundational understanding of behavioral theories in leadership.
Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire: The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) is a tool designed to assess and measure the behaviors of leaders within organizations. It focuses on identifying specific leadership behaviors that can impact team dynamics and performance, thereby linking directly to behavioral theories of leadership which emphasize observable actions rather than traits or characteristics.
Leadership Grid: The Leadership Grid is a model that outlines different leadership styles based on a manager's concern for people versus their concern for production. It visually represents how leaders can balance these two essential aspects to achieve effective leadership and organizational success, connecting deeply with behavioral theories that emphasize the impact of leader behavior on employee performance and satisfaction.
Leadership styles: Leadership styles refer to the various approaches and methods that leaders use to guide, motivate, and manage their teams or organizations. These styles can greatly influence group dynamics, employee satisfaction, and overall organizational effectiveness. Understanding different leadership styles helps in identifying the most suitable approach for specific situations and team needs.
Leadership Styles Inventory: The Leadership Styles Inventory (LSI) is a tool used to assess and identify an individual's predominant leadership styles based on their behaviors and attitudes in various situations. It categorizes leadership into distinct styles, which helps individuals understand their approach to leading teams and organizations. By recognizing these styles, leaders can enhance their effectiveness and adapt their behavior to meet the needs of their team members.
Managerial grid model: The managerial grid model is a framework for understanding different leadership styles based on a manager's concern for people versus their concern for production. Developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton, this model categorizes managers into five primary styles: impoverished, country club, authoritarian, team, and middle-of-the-road, illustrating how varying levels of concern can affect organizational effectiveness.
Michigan Studies: Michigan Studies refer to a series of research projects conducted at the University of Michigan in the 1950s that focused on leadership styles and their impact on employee performance and satisfaction. These studies contributed to the understanding of behavioral theories by identifying two primary leadership styles: employee-centered and production-centered, emphasizing the importance of interpersonal relationships in organizational success.
Middle-of-the-road management: Middle-of-the-road management is a leadership style that seeks to balance the needs of employees and the goals of the organization, aiming for moderate levels of performance and satisfaction. This approach often results in an average performance level, as it attempts to compromise between high production and employee welfare, rather than fully committing to either extreme.
Ohio State Studies: Ohio State Studies refer to a series of research initiatives conducted in the 1950s aimed at understanding the behaviors of leaders and their impact on organizational effectiveness. These studies played a significant role in identifying two primary dimensions of leadership behavior: consideration and initiating structure, which helped to expand the understanding of how different leadership styles affect group dynamics and performance.
Production orientation: Production orientation is a business philosophy that prioritizes the production process and the efficiency of manufacturing over the needs and preferences of consumers. This approach focuses on maximizing output, reducing costs, and improving the production process, often assuming that high-quality products will naturally attract customers. In this view, the emphasis is placed on internal efficiencies rather than on market demands or consumer insights.
Relationship-oriented behavior: Relationship-oriented behavior refers to a leadership style that emphasizes building positive interpersonal relationships and fostering a supportive work environment. This approach prioritizes the emotional well-being of team members, promoting collaboration, open communication, and trust. By focusing on the needs and concerns of individuals, leaders who practice relationship-oriented behavior aim to enhance team cohesion and overall performance.
Task-oriented behavior: Task-oriented behavior refers to actions and attitudes that focus primarily on the completion of specific tasks and goals within an organization. This type of behavior is characterized by a strong emphasis on efficiency, productivity, and the structured execution of responsibilities, often prioritizing the achievement of objectives over interpersonal relationships. It plays a crucial role in various behavioral theories by illustrating how leaders can effectively manage teams to accomplish set tasks.
Team cohesion: Team cohesion refers to the degree to which team members stick together and unite in pursuit of common goals. It fosters collaboration, trust, and a shared sense of purpose, which are critical in enhancing overall team performance and effectiveness.
Team management: Team management refers to the process of overseeing a group of individuals working together towards a common goal, ensuring effective collaboration, communication, and productivity. It encompasses various aspects such as setting clear objectives, fostering a positive team culture, and addressing conflicts to enhance team performance. Effective team management is crucial for achieving organizational goals and relies on understanding group dynamics and leveraging individual strengths.
Transactional leadership: Transactional leadership is a style of management that focuses on the exchanges between leaders and followers, where compliance is achieved through rewards and punishments. This approach emphasizes maintaining the normal flow of operations and is often seen as more task-oriented than transformational leadership, which aims to inspire and motivate beyond immediate goals.
Transformational leadership: Transformational leadership is a leadership style that inspires and motivates followers to exceed their own self-interests for the good of the organization, fostering a culture of innovation and change. This approach emphasizes the importance of vision, personal connection, and empowerment, creating an environment where individuals feel valued and capable of contributing to shared goals.