8.6 Collaborative journalism and partnerships

Collaborative journalism unites media outlets, pooling resources and expertise to tackle complex stories. This approach expands reach, shares costs, and leverages diverse skills, enabling high-impact reporting that might be impossible for a single newsroom.

Partnerships can involve media outlets, nonprofits, academics, or individual journalists and sources. Successful collaborations require clear communication, defined roles, and shared goals. While challenges exist, best practices like open communication and regular check-ins help ensure productive partnerships.

Benefits of collaborative journalism

• Collaborative journalism allows media outlets to pool their resources and expertise, enabling them to tackle more complex and in-depth stories that may be beyond the scope of a single newsroom
• Collaborations can expand the reach and impact of a story by leveraging the combined audiences and distribution channels of the partnering organizations
• By sharing costs and risks associated with resource-intensive investigations or projects, collaborative journalism makes it more feasible for newsrooms to pursue high-impact stories

Increased resources and expertise

Top images from around the web for Increased resources and expertise

• 

  Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lessons from the Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Collaboration emerges as an effective business model - James Breiner: Entrepreneurial Journalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lessons from the Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Increased resources and expertise

• 

  Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lessons from the Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Collaboration emerges as an effective business model - James Breiner: Entrepreneurial Journalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lessons from the Collaborative Journalism Summit View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Collaborating with other media outlets or organizations provides access to a wider range of skills, knowledge, and specialized expertise (data analysis, investigative techniques)
• Pooling resources such as funding, staff, and technology enables more comprehensive and well-researched reporting
• Collaborations can bring together journalists with diverse backgrounds and perspectives, enriching the storytelling and analysis

Expanded reach and impact

• Partnering with other media outlets allows stories to reach a broader and more diverse audience, amplifying the impact of the journalism
• Collaborations can leverage the combined social media presence and distribution networks of the partners to disseminate the story more widely
• Cross-promotion of collaborative projects by the partnering organizations can drive increased audience engagement and attention to the issue being reported on

Shared costs and risks

• Investigative journalism and in-depth reporting often require significant investments of time, money, and personnel, which can be a barrier for resource-constrained newsrooms
• Collaborations allow the costs of reporting to be shared among the partners, making it more feasible to pursue ambitious projects
• The risks associated with controversial or sensitive stories can be distributed among the collaborating organizations, providing a measure of protection and support

Types of collaborative partnerships

• Collaborative journalism can take various forms, depending on the nature of the partners involved and the goals of the project
• Partnerships may be formed between different types of organizations, such as media outlets, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, or individual journalists and sources
• The structure and duration of collaborations can vary from short-term, project-based partnerships to long-term, ongoing relationships

Media outlet collaborations

• Collaborations between different media outlets, such as newspapers, television networks, or digital news sites, allow for the pooling of resources and expertise
• Media outlet partnerships can be formed across geographic boundaries (regional, national, or international collaborations) or across different mediums (print, broadcast, online)
• Examples of media outlet collaborations include the Panama Papers investigation, which involved over 100 media organizations worldwide, and the California Reporting Project, a partnership among newsrooms across the state

Journalist and source collaborations

• Journalists may collaborate directly with sources, such as whistleblowers, experts, or affected communities, to report on a particular issue or story
• These collaborations can provide journalists with access to insider knowledge, first-hand accounts, and a deeper understanding of the subject matter
• Journalist-source collaborations require careful navigation of ethical considerations, such as protecting the safety and anonymity of sources and maintaining journalistic independence

Nonprofit and academic collaborations

• Partnerships between newsrooms and nonprofit organizations or academic institutions can bring together complementary skills and resources
• Nonprofit organizations may have subject-matter expertise, access to data, or community connections that can enhance the reporting process
• Academic collaborations can provide journalists with access to research, analysis, and specialized knowledge in fields relevant to the story being reported
• Examples include ProPublica's Local Reporting Network, which partners with local newsrooms to support investigative journalism, and the Stanford Open Policing Project, a collaboration between journalists and researchers to analyze police traffic stop data

Establishing effective partnerships

• Building successful collaborative journalism partnerships requires careful planning, clear communication, and a shared understanding of goals and expectations
• Partners should take the time to identify compatible collaborators, define roles and responsibilities, and establish a framework for decision-making and workflow
• Effective partnerships are built on a foundation of trust, transparency, and mutual respect among the collaborating parties

Identifying compatible partners

• Seek out partners that share similar journalistic values, editorial standards, and a commitment to the story or issue being reported on
• Consider the complementary skills, resources, and expertise that each potential partner can bring to the collaboration
• Assess the reputation and track record of potential partners to ensure they are reliable and trustworthy collaborators

Defining roles and responsibilities

• Clearly delineate the roles and responsibilities of each partner in the collaboration, including who will be responsible for specific tasks such as reporting, editing, fact-checking, and distribution
• Establish a decision-making process that ensures all partners have a voice and that there is a clear chain of command for editorial and logistical decisions
• Determine how bylines, credits, and any potential awards or recognition will be allocated among the partners

Setting clear goals and expectations

• Develop a shared understanding of the goals and intended outcomes of the collaborative project, including the target audience, desired impact, and any specific metrics for success
• Establish a timeline and milestones for the project, taking into account the schedules and capacities of each partner
• Discuss and agree upon any confidentiality or embargo agreements, as well as how and when the story will be published and promoted

Challenges in collaborative journalism

• While collaborative journalism offers many benefits, it also presents unique challenges that partners must navigate to ensure a successful and ethical collaboration
• These challenges can arise from differences in organizational cultures, editorial standards, and expectations among partners
• Addressing these challenges requires open communication, flexibility, and a commitment to finding solutions that prioritize the integrity of the journalism and the public interest

Aligning editorial standards

• Collaborating organizations may have different editorial policies, styles, and standards for reporting, fact-checking, and sourcing
• Partners must work to align their editorial practices to ensure consistency and accuracy in the final product
• This may require compromises and adaptations from all parties involved, as well as clear guidelines for how disagreements or conflicting standards will be resolved

Maintaining journalistic independence

• Collaborative partnerships, particularly those involving non-media organizations or funders, can raise concerns about potential influences on the journalistic process
• Partners must be vigilant in maintaining their journalistic independence and editorial control, ensuring that the interests of the collaboration do not compromise the integrity of the reporting
• Transparency about the nature of the collaboration and any potential conflicts of interest is crucial for maintaining public trust

Navigating differing work cultures

• Collaborating organizations may have different work styles, communication preferences, and decision-making processes, which can lead to misunderstandings or conflicts
• Partners should take the time to understand and respect each other's organizational cultures and find ways to bridge any gaps or differences
• Establishing clear protocols for communication, file-sharing, and version control can help streamline workflows and minimize confusion

Best practices for successful collaborations

• Successful collaborative journalism partnerships are built on a foundation of trust, transparency, and shared purpose
• Adopting best practices for communication, decision-making, and project management can help ensure a smooth and productive collaboration
• Regularly assessing the progress and effectiveness of the collaboration can help partners identify areas for improvement and adapt to changing circumstances

Open communication and trust

• Maintain open and honest communication among all partners throughout the collaboration, sharing information, ideas, and concerns in a timely manner
• Foster a culture of trust by following through on commitments, respecting confidentiality agreements, and being transparent about any challenges or setbacks
• Establish regular check-ins and communication channels to ensure all partners are informed and engaged in the project

Shared decision-making processes

• Develop a clear and equitable decision-making process that allows all partners to have a voice in key decisions about the project
• Establish a mechanism for resolving disagreements or conflicts that prioritizes the integrity of the journalism and the public interest
• Document decisions and agreements in writing to ensure clarity and accountability among all partners

Regular progress check-ins

• Schedule regular progress check-ins to assess the status of the project, identify any obstacles or challenges, and make any necessary adjustments to the timeline or workflow
• Use these check-ins to celebrate successes, share learnings, and provide constructive feedback to improve the collaboration
• Continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the collaboration in achieving its goals and make any necessary course corrections to ensure a successful outcome

Notable collaborative journalism projects

• Collaborative journalism has produced many high-impact and award-winning projects that have shed light on important issues and held the powerful accountable
• These projects demonstrate the potential of collaborative journalism to tackle complex stories, uncover wrongdoing, and drive positive change
• Studying notable collaborative journalism projects can provide inspiration and insights for newsrooms looking to embark on their own collaborations

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

• The ICIJ is a global network of investigative journalists who collaborate on large-scale, cross-border investigations into issues such as corruption, tax avoidance, and human rights abuses
• Notable ICIJ projects include the Panama Papers (2016), which exposed the hidden world of offshore finance, and the FinCEN Files (2020), which revealed how major banks facilitate money laundering and other illicit activities
• The ICIJ's collaborative model has been widely praised for its ability to harness the collective power of journalists around the world to hold the powerful accountable

ProPublica's Local Reporting Network

• ProPublica's Local Reporting Network is a program that partners with local newsrooms across the United States to support investigative journalism on issues of local and national importance
• The network provides funding, editorial support, and data analysis to help local journalists pursue in-depth stories that might otherwise go untold
• Notable projects from the Local Reporting Network include "The Bad Bet," a multi-newsroom investigation into the social and economic costs of video gambling in Illinois, and "Locked Down," an investigation into the use of solitary confinement in New Mexico prisons

Electionland: Monitoring voting issues

• Electionland is a collaborative project that brings together newsrooms, technology companies, and citizen journalists to monitor and report on voting issues in real-time during U.S. elections
• The project, which was first launched in 2016, uses a combination of data analysis, social media monitoring, and on-the-ground reporting to identify and verify reports of long lines, voter intimidation, machine breakdowns, and other problems at polling places
• Electionland has been credited with providing a more comprehensive and accurate picture of the voting experience and has helped to hold election officials accountable for addressing problems at the polls

Ethical considerations in collaborations

• Collaborative journalism raises unique ethical considerations that partners must navigate to ensure the integrity and credibility of their work
• These considerations include issues of transparency, source protection, and conflicts of interest
• Partners should establish clear ethical guidelines and protocols at the outset of the collaboration and regularly review and update them as needed

Transparency about partnerships

• Be transparent with audiences about the nature of the collaborative partnership, including the roles and contributions of each partner
• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest or funding sources that may be relevant to the collaboration
• Provide clear attribution and credit for the work of each partner in the final product

Protecting confidential sources

• Collaborative projects may involve working with confidential sources or handling sensitive information, which can raise concerns about source protection and data security
• Partners should establish clear protocols for communicating with and protecting sources, including secure communication channels and data storage practices
• Ensure that all partners understand and adhere to any confidentiality agreements or legal obligations related to source protection

Avoiding conflicts of interest

• Collaborations between journalists and non-media partners, such as advocacy organizations or funders, can raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest
• Partners should establish clear guidelines for maintaining editorial independence and preventing any undue influence on the reporting process
• Be transparent about any potential conflicts of interest and take steps to mitigate them, such as establishing firewalls between funding sources and editorial decision-making

Measuring the impact of collaborations

• Measuring the impact of collaborative journalism projects is essential for demonstrating the value of collaborations and identifying areas for improvement
• Impact can be assessed through a variety of metrics, including audience engagement, policy changes, and social outcomes
• Partners should establish clear goals and metrics for success at the outset of the collaboration and regularly track and report on progress

Tracking audience engagement metrics

• Monitor metrics such as page views, time on site, social media shares, and comments to gauge audience engagement with the collaborative project
• Use analytics tools to track the reach and distribution of the project across different platforms and media outlets
• Conduct audience surveys or focus groups to gather qualitative feedback on the impact and relevance of the project

Assessing policy and social changes

• Track any policy changes or legislative actions that result from the collaborative project, such as new laws, regulations, or investigations
• Monitor any social or behavioral changes that may be influenced by the project, such as increased public awareness or shifts in public opinion
• Collect case studies or anecdotal evidence of the project's impact on individuals or communities

Evaluating partner satisfaction

• Conduct post-project evaluations with all partners to assess the effectiveness of the collaboration and identify areas for improvement
• Gather feedback on the collaborative process, including communication, decision-making, and workflow, to inform future partnerships
• Celebrate successes and share learnings with the wider journalism community to promote the value and potential of collaborative journalism