12.2 Equal Protection and Anti-Discrimination Laws
3 min read•august 9, 2024
The guarantees equal treatment under the law for all persons in the U.S. It's a key part of the , which aims to protect individual rights against state power. Courts use different levels of scrutiny to review laws that might discriminate against certain groups.
Anti-discrimination laws build on this constitutional foundation. They prohibit unfair treatment based on characteristics like race, gender, or disability. These laws have expanded over time to protect more groups and cover areas like employment, education, and public accommodations.
Equal Protection and Scrutiny
Constitutional Foundations and Classifications
Top images from around the web for Constitutional Foundations and Classifications
Progressive Charlestown: Corporate Privacy is Alive and Well View original
Is this image relevant?
Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Reading: Criminal Activity | Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Progressive Charlestown: Corporate Privacy is Alive and Well View original
Is this image relevant?
Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Constitutional Foundations and Classifications
Progressive Charlestown: Corporate Privacy is Alive and Well View original
Is this image relevant?
Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Reading: Criminal Activity | Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Progressive Charlestown: Corporate Privacy is Alive and Well View original
Is this image relevant?
Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Equal Protection Clause guarantees equal treatment under the law for all persons within U.S. jurisdiction
- Suspect classifications trigger in legal challenges
- Include race, national origin, and alienage
- Courts apply highest level of review to laws discriminating based on these categories
- Quasi-suspect classifications subject to
- Encompass gender and legitimacy
- Courts apply heightened, but not strictest, level of review
Levels of Scrutiny and Legal Tests
- Strict scrutiny requires government to prove law is narrowly tailored to achieve compelling state interest
- Applies to suspect classifications and fundamental rights
- Government bears burden of proof
- Most laws fail to pass this test
- Intermediate scrutiny demands law must be substantially related to important government objective
- Used for quasi-suspect classifications
- Government must show exceedingly persuasive justification for discrimination
- applies to all other classifications
- Law must be rationally related to legitimate government interest
- Lowest level of scrutiny, most deferential to government
Disparate Impact and Legal Implications
- occurs when facially neutral laws disproportionately affect protected groups
- Differs from , which involves intentional discrimination
- Courts may consider statistical evidence to determine disparate impact
- Challenging disparate impact requires showing:
- Specific policy or practice causes disparity
- Alternative practices could achieve same goals with less discriminatory effect
- Disparate impact claims allowed under some civil rights laws (Fair Housing Act, Title VII)
Anti-Discrimination Legislation
Landmark Civil Rights Laws
- prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
- Title II bans discrimination in public accommodations
- Title VI prohibits discrimination in federally funded programs
- Title VII addresses employment discrimination
- protects voting rights of racial minorities
- Outlawed discriminatory voting practices (literacy tests, poll taxes)
- Requires federal preclearance for changes to voting laws in certain jurisdictions
- Periodically renewed and updated by Congress
Expanding Protections for Specific Groups
- (ADA) of 1990 prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities
- Covers employment, public accommodations, transportation, and telecommunications
- Requires reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities
- Amended in 2008 to broaden definition of disability
- Title IX of Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs
- Applies to admissions, athletics, and sexual harassment
- Requires equal opportunities for male and female students in sports
- Mandates schools address sexual violence and harassment
Affirmative Action and Ongoing Debates
- policies aim to increase diversity and remedy past discrimination
- Implemented in education and employment contexts
- Can involve preferential consideration for underrepresented groups
- Supreme Court decisions have shaped affirmative action practices
- (1978) allowed race as one factor in admissions decisions
- (2003) upheld narrow use of race in law school admissions
- (2016) reaffirmed limited use of race in admissions
- Ongoing debates surround effectiveness and constitutionality of affirmative action
- Supporters argue it promotes diversity and addresses systemic inequalities
- Critics claim it violates Equal Protection Clause and perpetuates reverse discrimination
Key Terms to Review (19)
14th Amendment: The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, is a crucial part of the U.S. Constitution that grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States and ensures equal protection under the law. This amendment plays a significant role in shaping civil rights and liberties, as it addresses issues of due process and equal protection, thus influencing various legal standards and societal changes.
Affirmative Action: Affirmative action refers to policies and practices aimed at increasing the representation of historically marginalized groups in various areas such as education, employment, and government contracting. These initiatives seek to address past discrimination and promote diversity, ensuring equal opportunities for individuals regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Affirmative action is closely tied to the legal framework surrounding equal protection and anti-discrimination laws, as well as the interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment in state actions.
Americans with Disabilities Act: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law enacted in 1990 that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, and telecommunications. The ADA aims to ensure that people with disabilities have the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, promoting equal access and participation in society. It is a crucial piece of legislation that connects to broader themes of equality and anti-discrimination efforts across various social movements.
Bakke Case: The Bakke Case, formally known as Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, was a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1978 that addressed affirmative action in higher education admissions. The case involved Allan Bakke, a white applicant who claimed he was denied admission to the University of California, Davis Medical School due to a racial quota system that favored minority applicants, raising significant questions about equal protection under the law and discrimination.
Brown v. Board of Education: Brown v. Board of Education is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1954 that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, effectively overturning the 'separate but equal' doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson. This case significantly advanced civil rights by establishing that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, which has had profound implications for equality and anti-discrimination laws.
Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is landmark legislation in the United States that prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This act aimed to eliminate segregation in schools, at the workplace, and in public accommodations, marking a significant step towards achieving equality and civil rights for all Americans. It laid the groundwork for future anti-discrimination laws and played a crucial role in the civil rights movement, addressing systemic inequalities and providing a legal framework for challenging discrimination.
Civil rights movement: The civil rights movement was a social and political struggle during the 1950s and 1960s aimed at ending racial discrimination and securing equal rights for African Americans and other marginalized groups in the United States. It sought to challenge and dismantle systemic racism through various means, including legal action, grassroots activism, and peaceful protests.
Disparate impact: Disparate impact refers to a legal theory that focuses on the effects of a policy or practice, rather than its intent, in creating unequal outcomes for different groups. This concept is crucial in assessing whether certain actions disproportionately affect individuals based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics, even if those actions are not explicitly discriminatory. By examining the outcomes, disparate impact helps identify hidden biases within policies and promotes equality under the law.
Disparate treatment: Disparate treatment refers to a legal theory used in discrimination cases where individuals are treated differently based on their protected characteristics, such as race, gender, or age. This concept highlights intentional discrimination, distinguishing it from disparate impact, which focuses on the effects of policies rather than the intent behind them. It plays a crucial role in understanding how laws protect individuals from unfair treatment and ensure equal protection under the law.
Equal Protection Clause: The Equal Protection Clause is a provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution that requires states to treat individuals equally under the law. This clause is significant in preventing discrimination and ensuring that all people have equal access to legal rights and protections, impacting state court systems, anti-discrimination laws, and the way states amend their constitutions.
Fisher v. University of Texas: Fisher v. University of Texas was a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of affirmative action policies in college admissions. The case involved Abigail Fisher, a white applicant who claimed that the university's consideration of race in admissions decisions violated her rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case highlights the ongoing debate over race-conscious policies and their implications for equality and diversity in higher education.
Grutter v. Bollinger: Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark Supreme Court case from 2003 that upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School, asserting that the use of race as one factor among many in admissions decisions is constitutional. This decision affirmed the importance of diversity in higher education and clarified the legal parameters for affirmative action, linking it to principles of equal protection and social justice.
Intermediate Scrutiny: Intermediate scrutiny is a standard of judicial review used by courts to evaluate laws or government actions that affect certain protected classes or constitutional rights, particularly in cases of discrimination. This level of scrutiny requires that the law in question serve an important government objective and be substantially related to achieving that objective. It often applies in contexts like gender discrimination and restrictions on speech that do not receive full First Amendment protection.
Rational Basis Review: Rational basis review is a standard of judicial review used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of legislation or government actions that affect individuals' rights. Under this standard, a law is deemed constitutional as long as it has a legitimate government purpose and the means chosen to achieve that purpose are rationally related to it. This review is often applied in cases involving economic regulations and social welfare laws, making it a key concept in understanding how courts balance individual rights with government interests.
Roe v. Wade: Roe v. Wade is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1973 that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion under the right to privacy. This case has become a critical reference point in discussions about reproductive rights, equality, and the scope of government power in personal decisions, influencing numerous legal battles and social movements surrounding women's rights and bodily autonomy.
Strict scrutiny: Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of judicial review used by courts when evaluating laws or governmental actions that restrict fundamental rights or involve suspect classifications. It requires that the law serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest while using the least restrictive means possible. This standard is essential for protecting individual rights against government infringement and plays a critical role in assessing various constitutional issues.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972: Title IX is a federal law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. This legislation aims to ensure equal opportunities for all students, particularly in athletics and academics, promoting gender equity and reducing sexual harassment in educational settings.
Voting Rights Act of 1965: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is landmark legislation aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in voting. This act was a response to widespread disenfranchisement of African American voters, particularly in the Southern states, and it enforced the voting rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. By prohibiting discriminatory practices and requiring federal oversight of voter registration in certain areas, it played a crucial role in advancing civil rights and ensuring that all citizens could participate in the electoral process without facing systemic barriers.
Women’s suffrage movement: The women’s suffrage movement was a social and political campaign aimed at granting women the right to vote and ensuring equal participation in electoral processes. This movement emerged as a response to systemic gender discrimination and laid the groundwork for broader anti-discrimination efforts, influencing various legal frameworks aimed at achieving equal protection under the law. It was a pivotal aspect of voting rights history, shaping contemporary discussions about equity and representation in democracy.