6.2 Explicit instruction
9 min read•august 21, 2024
Explicit instruction is a cornerstone of special education, offering structured learning experiences for students with diverse needs. It breaks down complex skills into manageable components, aligning closely with individualized education programs to provide targeted support.
Key components include teacher-led instruction, clear objectives, and frequent practice opportunities. Rooted in behaviorist and cognitive theories, explicit instruction addresses unique learning needs by reducing cognitive load and providing for students with disabilities.
Definition of explicit instruction
- Explicit instruction forms a cornerstone of special education practices designed to provide clear, structured learning experiences
- Emphasizes direct teaching methods where educators systematically break down complex skills into manageable components
- Aligns closely with individualized education programs (IEPs) by offering targeted support for students with diverse learning needs
Key components
Top images from around the web for Key components
Frontiers | Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Noticing of Explicit Instruction for Self ... View original
Is this image relevant?
2.2 Instructional Strategies | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Noticing of Explicit Instruction for Self ... View original
Is this image relevant?
2.2 Instructional Strategies | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Key components
Frontiers | Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Noticing of Explicit Instruction for Self ... View original
Is this image relevant?
2.2 Instructional Strategies | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Noticing of Explicit Instruction for Self ... View original
Is this image relevant?
2.2 Instructional Strategies | Foundations of Education View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Teacher-led instruction guides students through new concepts step-by-step
- Clear learning objectives communicated at the beginning of each lesson
- Frequent opportunities for student practice and feedback
- Systematic review of previously learned material
- Scaffolded support gradually reduced as students gain proficiency
Theoretical foundations
- Rooted in behaviorist learning theories emphasizing observable behaviors and reinforcement
- Incorporates cognitive science principles on information processing and memory
- Draws from social learning theory highlighting the importance of and
- Aligns with Vygotsky's zone of proximal development concept focusing on instructional
Rationale for explicit instruction
- Explicit instruction addresses the unique learning needs of students with disabilities by providing structured, systematic support
- Offers a framework for breaking down complex skills into manageable steps, essential for many special education students
- Aligns with in special education, promoting effective teaching strategies
Benefits for diverse learners
- Reduces cognitive load by presenting information in small, digestible chunks
- Provides clear expectations and structure, benefiting students with attention difficulties
- Offers multiple opportunities for practice, supporting skill mastery for students with learning disabilities
- Incorporates multi-sensory approaches, aiding students with various processing strengths
Evidence-based effectiveness
- Meta-analyses show significant positive effects on academic achievement across subject areas
- Particularly effective for students with learning disabilities and at-risk learners
- Demonstrates long-term retention of skills and knowledge compared to less structured approaches
- Improves student confidence and self-efficacy through systematic skill building
Stages of explicit instruction
- Explicit instruction follows a structured sequence designed to gradually transfer responsibility to the learner
- This approach aligns with special education principles of scaffolded support and individualized instruction
- Stages progress from teacher-led demonstrations to independent student application of skills
Modeling
- Teacher demonstrates the target skill or strategy while thinking aloud
- Clear, step-by-step explanations of the thought process behind each action
- Multiple examples provided to illustrate different applications of the skill
- Visual aids or manipulatives used to enhance understanding (graphic organizers)
- Students observe and ask questions to clarify their understanding
Guided practice
- Students attempt the skill with teacher support and
- Collaborative problem-solving between teacher and students
- Gradual increase in task complexity as students demonstrate understanding
- Use of prompts and cues to guide student performance
- Frequent checks for understanding to ensure student progress
Independent practice
- Students apply the skill independently with minimal teacher support
- Varied practice opportunities to promote skill generalization
- Ongoing monitoring and feedback to reinforce correct application
- Differentiated tasks to accommodate individual student needs
- Reflection on learning process to enhance metacognitive skills
Planning explicit instruction
- Careful planning forms the foundation of effective explicit instruction in special education settings
- Aligns instructional design with individual student needs and IEP goals
- Ensures systematic progression of skills and concepts throughout the curriculum
Identifying learning objectives
- Align objectives with state standards and IEP goals
- Use clear, measurable language to define expected outcomes
- Consider both content knowledge and cognitive processes
- Break complex skills into smaller, achievable sub-skills
- Ensure objectives are appropriate for diverse learner needs
Task analysis
- Break down complex skills into sequential, teachable steps
- Identify prerequisite skills needed for successful task completion
- Consider potential areas of difficulty for students with specific disabilities
- Determine appropriate scaffolds for each step of the process
- Create a visual representation of the task sequence (flow chart)
Sequencing instruction
- Organize content from simple to complex concepts
- Build on previously mastered skills to support new learning
- Incorporate frequent review and practice opportunities
- Plan for spiral review of key concepts throughout the curriculum
- Adjust pacing based on ongoing assessment of student progress
Delivery techniques
- Effective delivery of explicit instruction requires specific techniques to enhance student understanding
- These approaches support special education students by providing clear, structured learning experiences
- Techniques focus on making abstract concepts concrete and accessible to diverse learners
Clear explanations
- Use precise, concise language appropriate for student comprehension levels
- Break down complex ideas into smaller, manageable chunks
- Provide real-world examples to illustrate abstract concepts
- Use analogies to connect new information to familiar ideas
- Repeat key points and summarize main ideas throughout the lesson
Think-alouds
- Verbalize thought processes while demonstrating problem-solving strategies
- Model metacognitive skills by explaining decision-making rationale
- Demonstrate error detection and correction strategies
- Encourage students to practice during guided practice
- Use think-alouds to illustrate both content knowledge and learning strategies
Visual supports
- Incorporate graphic organizers to represent relationships between concepts
- Use color-coding to highlight important information or steps in a process
- Create anchor charts to display key vocabulary or procedural steps
- Utilize manipulatives to provide hands-on learning experiences
- Implement technology tools to create interactive visual aids (digital mind maps)
Scaffolding in explicit instruction
- Scaffolding plays a crucial role in supporting special education students' learning progression
- This approach aligns with the principle of providing appropriate support to meet individual needs
- Effective scaffolding gradually transfers responsibility from teacher to student as skills develop
Types of scaffolds
- Cognitive scaffolds support mental processes and problem-solving strategies
- Metacognitive scaffolds promote self-reflection and learning strategy awareness
- Affective scaffolds address emotional and motivational aspects of learning
- Linguistic scaffolds support language development and comprehension
- Technical scaffolds utilize tools or technology to aid task completion
Gradual release of responsibility
- "I do, we do, you do" model structures the transition from teacher-led to independent work
- Initial high levels of support gradually decrease as student competence increases
- Frequent checks for understanding guide the pace of support reduction
- Differentiated support allows for individualized scaffolding based on student needs
- Encourages student self-monitoring and self-regulation skills
Feedback and error correction
- Effective feedback and error correction strategies are essential components of explicit instruction
- These practices support special education students in developing accurate skills and knowledge
- Timely and specific feedback promotes student progress and motivation
Immediate vs delayed feedback
- Immediate feedback provides real-time correction and reinforcement
- Supports rapid skill acquisition and prevents reinforcement of errors
- Delayed feedback allows for student self-reflection and problem-solving
- Can be more effective for complex tasks or conceptual understanding
- Choice between immediate and delayed feedback depends on task complexity and student needs
Corrective feedback strategies
- Error analysis identifies patterns in student mistakes
- Specific, descriptive feedback focuses on the task rather than the student
- Positive error correction reframes mistakes as learning opportunities
- Guided error correction involves students in the correction process
- Systematic error correction addresses common misconceptions across the class
Assessment in explicit instruction
- Assessment in explicit instruction closely aligns with special education practices of ongoing progress monitoring
- Informs instructional decisions and helps tailor support to individual student needs
- Provides data to measure progress towards IEP goals and adjust instruction accordingly
Formative assessment techniques
- Exit tickets gauge understanding at the end of lessons
- Think-pair-share activities promote peer discussion and assessment
- Quick writes allow students to demonstrate knowledge in brief written responses
- Response cards provide immediate visual feedback on student comprehension
- Digital tools enable real-time assessment and data collection (online quizzes)
Progress monitoring
- Curriculum-based measurement tracks student growth in specific skill areas
- Frequent data collection allows for timely instructional adjustments
- Goal setting and progress graphs involve students in monitoring their own learning
- Diagnostic assessments identify specific areas of difficulty for targeted intervention
- Benchmark assessments measure progress against grade-level standards
Explicit instruction vs discovery learning
- Understanding the differences between explicit instruction and discovery learning informs instructional choices
- Special educators often blend approaches to meet diverse student needs
- Recognizing the strengths and limitations of each approach supports effective instructional planning
Strengths and limitations
- Explicit instruction provides clear structure and support for struggling learners
- Ensures essential skills and concepts are directly taught and practiced
- May limit opportunities for creative problem-solving or deep conceptual understanding
- Discovery learning promotes active engagement and exploration of concepts
- Can be challenging for students who need more structure or have limited background knowledge
Appropriate contexts for each
- Explicit instruction well-suited for teaching foundational skills (phonics)
- Effective for introducing new concepts or complex procedures
- Discovery learning beneficial for extending knowledge or applying skills in novel contexts
- Blended approaches can combine with guided exploration
- Consider student needs, learning objectives, and content complexity when choosing approaches
Differentiation in explicit instruction
- Differentiation within explicit instruction aligns closely with special education principles of individualized support
- Adapts instruction to meet diverse learning needs while maintaining structured approach
- Ensures all students can access and benefit from explicit instruction techniques
Adapting for diverse needs
- Vary presentation methods to accommodate different learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic)
- Adjust pacing based on individual student processing speeds
- Modify complexity of examples and practice tasks to match student readiness levels
- Provide multiple means of engagement to address diverse interests and motivations
- Offer choices in how students demonstrate their learning (written, oral, visual representations)
Individualized supports
- Use assistive technology to support specific learning needs (text-to-speech software)
- Implement behavior support plans to address individual behavioral challenges
- Provide additional scaffolding for students with significant learning difficulties
- Incorporate student interests into examples and practice activities
- Collaborate with related service providers to integrate therapy goals into instruction
Technology integration
- Technology integration enhances explicit instruction practices in special education settings
- Provides additional avenues for presenting information, practicing skills, and assessing progress
- Supports individualized instruction and accommodations for diverse learner needs
Digital tools for explicit instruction
- Interactive whiteboards facilitate visual modeling and guided practice
- Learning management systems organize and deliver instructional content
- Digital manipulatives provide virtual hands-on learning experiences
- Text-to-speech and speech-to-text software support reading and writing tasks
- Adaptive learning programs adjust difficulty based on student performance
Virtual learning considerations
- Ensure accessibility of digital content for students with various disabilities
- Provide clear structure and expectations for online learning environments
- Incorporate synchronous and asynchronous learning opportunities
- Utilize breakout rooms for small group instruction and guided practice
- Implement digital assessment tools to monitor progress in virtual settings
Challenges and misconceptions
- Addressing challenges and misconceptions about explicit instruction improves implementation
- Understanding potential issues helps special educators anticipate and overcome obstacles
- Clarifying misconceptions supports effective use of explicit instruction techniques
Common implementation issues
- Over-reliance on teacher-led instruction limiting student engagement
- Insufficient opportunities for guided and independent practice
- Lack of connection between explicit instruction and real-world applications
- Inadequate differentiation to meet diverse student needs
- Failure to fade supports and promote student independence
Addressing student engagement
- Incorporate active learning strategies within explicit instruction framework
- Use multimedia and technology to enhance lesson presentations
- Connect content to student interests and real-world applications
- Implement cooperative learning activities during guided practice
- Provide opportunities for student choice and self-assessment
Key Terms to Review (18)
Clear expectations: Clear expectations refer to the specific and well-defined guidelines set by educators regarding what is expected of students in terms of behavior, performance, and learning outcomes. These expectations create a structured learning environment, allowing students to understand their goals and the standards they need to meet, which is essential for effective teaching and learning.
Direct Instruction: Direct instruction is a structured teaching method that emphasizes systematic, explicit teaching of skills and concepts through clear, focused instruction. This approach often includes demonstrations, modeling, and guided practice, ensuring that students understand the material before moving on to independent work. It connects closely with evidence-based practices by relying on proven strategies to enhance learning outcomes, promotes explicit instruction techniques for clarity, and can be effectively applied in social skills training by providing clear examples and feedback.
Evidence-based practices: Evidence-based practices refer to instructional strategies and interventions that have been proven effective through rigorous research and empirical data. These practices are crucial for enhancing student learning, particularly in special education, as they ensure that teaching methods are grounded in scientific evidence, leading to improved educational outcomes. They encompass a variety of approaches that are tailored to meet the needs of diverse learners, promoting an effective and systematic way to implement teaching strategies.
Formative Assessment: Formative assessment refers to a range of evaluation processes used by educators to monitor student learning and provide ongoing feedback that can be used to improve teaching and learning. It is crucial for understanding students' needs, shaping instruction, and ensuring that all learners, including those with diverse needs, are progressing towards their educational goals.
Guided practice: Guided practice is a teaching strategy where the instructor provides support and guidance to students as they practice a new skill or concept. This approach allows learners to apply what they've been taught in a structured environment, receiving immediate feedback and assistance, which helps reinforce their understanding and confidence.
Immediate feedback: Immediate feedback is a response provided to learners right after they complete a task or answer a question, allowing them to understand their performance instantly. This type of feedback is crucial because it helps reinforce learning, clarifies misunderstandings, and encourages students to adjust their approach while the information is still fresh in their minds. It creates an interactive learning environment that supports engagement and promotes mastery of skills.
Lesson objectives: Lesson objectives are specific statements that clearly define what students are expected to learn and achieve by the end of a lesson. These objectives guide the planning and delivery of instruction, ensuring that both educators and students have a clear understanding of the desired outcomes. They serve as a roadmap for effective teaching and help to measure student progress.
Measurable Objectives: Measurable objectives are specific, clear goals that can be quantitatively assessed to determine progress or achievement. These objectives serve as benchmarks in educational settings, helping educators and stakeholders evaluate student performance and the effectiveness of instruction or interventions. By being observable and quantifiable, measurable objectives ensure that everyone involved has a common understanding of the expected outcomes.
Modeling: Modeling is the process of demonstrating or illustrating a specific behavior, skill, or concept for learners to observe and imitate. This technique plays a critical role in instruction by providing a clear example of what is expected, thereby helping learners to understand and practice new skills effectively. When applied in educational contexts, modeling can enhance understanding and retention of information, making it an essential strategy across various teaching methods.
Personalized learning: Personalized learning is an educational approach that tailors instruction to meet the individual needs, strengths, and interests of each student. This method fosters a more engaging and effective learning environment by allowing students to take control of their learning paths and progress at their own pace. Personalized learning involves the use of assessments, data, and instructional strategies to adapt to varying learning styles and preferences, ultimately supporting the unique educational journeys of all learners.
Questioning strategies: Questioning strategies are techniques used by educators to engage students, promote critical thinking, and assess understanding during instruction. These strategies can include open-ended questions, wait time, and prompting techniques, all of which encourage students to think deeply and articulate their thoughts. Effective questioning can guide learning, stimulate discussion, and provide valuable feedback for both students and teachers.
Scaffolding: Scaffolding is an instructional strategy that involves providing temporary support to learners to help them achieve a higher level of understanding and skill acquisition. This support is gradually removed as students become more competent, promoting independence and confidence in their learning process. The concept connects to various educational strategies by enhancing accessibility, collaboration, and individualized learning experiences.
Specific learning outcomes: Specific learning outcomes are clearly defined statements that articulate what learners are expected to achieve or demonstrate as a result of instruction. These outcomes provide direction for both teaching and assessment, ensuring that educational goals are met in a structured way that benefits all students.
Specific praise: Specific praise is a form of positive feedback that acknowledges particular behaviors or achievements of an individual, highlighting what they did well. This type of feedback not only reinforces desired actions but also helps learners understand the exact behaviors that led to their success, creating a clear link between their efforts and the recognition they receive.
Summative Assessment: Summative assessment is a method of evaluating student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. This type of assessment typically focuses on the outcomes of learning and is used to measure student achievement against predetermined goals and objectives. It is essential for understanding the effectiveness of educational strategies and guides future instructional decisions.
Systematic Instruction: Systematic instruction is a structured approach to teaching that emphasizes clear objectives, consistent methods, and ongoing assessment to promote student learning. This method focuses on breaking down complex skills into smaller, manageable steps and providing direct teaching and practice opportunities, making it particularly effective for students with diverse learning needs. The systematic nature allows educators to implement strategies that support the individual learning processes of students.
Think-alouds: Think-alouds are a cognitive strategy where individuals verbalize their thoughts, feelings, and reasoning processes while engaging in a task or problem-solving activity. This technique helps learners make their internal cognitive processes visible, enabling teachers to assess understanding and provide tailored support. Think-alouds are particularly valuable in teaching as they demonstrate how to approach a task, break down complex information, and facilitate deeper understanding through reflection.
Tiered instruction: Tiered instruction is an educational approach that involves providing different levels of support and challenge to students based on their individual needs, readiness, and learning profiles. This method allows educators to meet diverse learning styles and abilities within a single classroom, ensuring that all students can access the curriculum effectively. By differentiating tasks and expectations, tiered instruction promotes engagement and helps all learners progress at their own pace.